In the Register
Iain Downs | 13/11/2017 08:04:03 |
976 forum posts 805 photos |
Iain |
Journeyman | 13/11/2017 10:04:41 |
![]() 1257 forum posts 264 photos | Interesting, I think I will order one straight away John |
Ady1 | 13/11/2017 10:08:57 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | The big problem for this kind of new technology is that copies can be be made and sold at a fraction of the cost within 10 years Great to see things romping onwards though I'll pick one up at Lidl for 599 in 2026 |
Enough! | 13/11/2017 18:18:43 |
1719 forum posts 1 photos | "Final finishing then completes the process." .... something about Details and the Devil? I also thought this statement in the article was questionable: "Just as inkjet printers produced high-resolution printing at a much cheaper price than laser printing ......" I have both a laser and a couple of inkjet printers. I know what I think is cheaper. |
Neil Lickfold | 13/11/2017 19:25:07 |
1025 forum posts 204 photos | In reality, this is 3d printing a sintered item. It really is not the same as a 3d printed metal part that has beed printed with an electron beam that fuses the layers together in real time. But the technology is movingvery quickly with new ideas it seems monthly. I know that many are working on ways to mimick the over casting methods, like when a steel or cast iron part has a cast Al alloy feature as part of the whole, or when metal inserts are cast over with alloys. The last level will be the combination of metals and ceramics , especially for parts that are exposed to extreme heat, like in a rocket engine. Neil
|
Jeff Dayman | 13/11/2017 19:50:26 |
2356 forum posts 47 photos | The final product from DLS extrusion/deposition machines that produce metal powder models bound with wax or resin, then get sintered in a furnace have much lower accuracy than models made by direct laser fused metal powder. I've had several of each type made by service bureaus. Accuracy to parent CAD model on the sintered ones, on stainless steel alloy objects the size of a computer mouse, varied from +/-.030" in some areas to +/-.012" in areas closer to the build bed. For similar size models from a direct fused powder type machine it was accurate to CAD +/-.006" pretty much everywhere. Big difference in part price though for the higher accuracy direct fused powder models. If you want to make purely decorative articles or articles to be post-machined later (like using a casting for a steam model part) the cheaper extrusion/deposition machines and parts furnace-sintered may be fine. That type of machine will probably hit the home-build market before the direct fusing type. One thing to consider with any of this type of machine that uses loose metal powder (vs string on a reel like 3D prints, in the extrusion/deposition machines) - loose metal powder is a major health and safety hazard and needs to be handled with great care and with proper PPE in place. There are also restrictions on shipping many of these powdered metals and how much of them you can store in one place, in some cases. Edited By Jeff Dayman on 13/11/2017 19:51:15 |
Neil Wyatt | 13/11/2017 21:55:59 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | For models and the time being I suggest using the lost-PLA casting process - much cheaper! I posted this the other day, 1 3/8" tall. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.