choochoo_baloo | 20/06/2017 14:41:56 |
![]() 282 forum posts 67 photos | I now wish to progress onto boring and want to buy an indexable boring tool. Whilst looking through arceurotrade, I realise that I can either go fro the cheapaer Chinese ~£17, or the quality Japanese tools ~£90. I am a very firm believer in buying the most expensive tools one can afford, but have read on here and elsewhere that others achieve excellent results with the former (non-Japanese). So my question is: for a commited newcomer looking to built up a quality tool kit over time, are the unbranded/cheaper indexable boring tools and inserts actually more than good enough (I am using a Myford ML7)? Any advice gratefully received. Edited By choochoo_baloo on 20/06/2017 14:42:17 |
JasonB | 20/06/2017 15:03:08 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Holders are good enough, put a brand name tip on it to make it even better. Edited By JasonB on 20/06/2017 15:04:03 |
Tony Pratt 1 | 20/06/2017 15:14:56 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | I would give the budget boring tools a go, yes try a named tip also the screws aren't always the best in cheapo tooling. Tony |
richardandtracy | 20/06/2017 15:32:54 |
![]() 943 forum posts 10 photos | Well, I don't know what size you're going for, but I got this tiny one: **LINK** in April and have found it perfect for working with pens. 10 inserts + holder for £6.99, if the holder dies on me before the inserts are worn out, I still reckon I'm quids in as it has let me do a job with the money I have, as opposed to putting the job off for years while I try to justify £90 or some other silly price needed to get a branded item. Regards, Richard.
|
Clive Brown 1 | 20/06/2017 15:53:58 |
1050 forum posts 56 photos | I'm interested in this thread. I recently purchased an Arceurotrade indexable boring bar, the low-cost Chinese type with a standard tip. This was to supplement the collection of mainly HSS boring tools used on my Boxford ME10. The attraction was the compact dimensions of the "sharp end" and the avoidance of what can be extensive grinding of HSS to make a shaped tool. I can only say that I'm badly disillusioned. The surface finish is terrible in mild steel, En3, a bit better, but still poor in some tougher stuff, possibly EN8. I've tried ramping up the speed, as seems to be advised in places, but with little improvement. I now see this tool as little better than useless except for the most crude roughing cuts. OK, I must be doing it wrong, would an expensive tip transform things? The bar itself seems reasonably well made and it's held rigidly. I should say that I sometimes use carbide tipped tools for external turning with no real problems. Any advice appreciated! Clive
|
Tony Pratt 1 | 20/06/2017 16:08:55 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | Posted by richardandtracy on 20/06/2017 15:32:54:
Well, I don't know what size you're going for, but I got this tiny one: **LINK** in April and have found it perfect for working with pens. 10 inserts + holder for £6.99, if the holder dies on me before the inserts are worn out, I still reckon I'm quids in as it has let me do a job with the money I have, as opposed to putting the job off for years while I try to justify £90 or some other silly price needed to get a branded item. Regards, Richard.
How in gods name are they turning these out for £6.99? Tony |
richardandtracy | 20/06/2017 16:15:57 |
![]() 943 forum posts 10 photos | I have no idea, and it includes postage. I can't send a parcel half way across the world for less than £3.60. Regards, Richard |
mick | 20/06/2017 16:48:32 |
421 forum posts 49 photos | The boring bar is just to hold the insert, its the insert that needs to be a reasonable quality. I've bought a set of eight boring bars from Alidirect for around £40.0 and I can't fault them, even with the inserts that came with them, but you can buy a packet of named inserts from the same source a whole lot cheaper than in the UK. If there is a draw back you may have to wait two to three weeks for delivery. |
SillyOldDuffer | 20/06/2017 17:04:04 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by choochoo_baloo on 20/06/2017 14:41:56:
I ... want to buy an indexable boring tool. ... I realise that I can either go fro the cheapaer Chinese ~£17, or the quality Japanese tools ~£90. I am a very firm believer in buying the most expensive tools one can afford, ...
Any advice gratefully received. Edited By choochoo_baloo on 20/06/2017 14:42:17 I'd say the answer depends enormously on why you are 'a very firm believer in buying the most expensive tools one can afford'. I feel the 'buy expensive, buy once' advice is rather out-of-date. It made good sense up until about 1970 but after that competition in the tool market has been forcing prices down. In the old days quite a lot of stuff was either good or bad. Now there's a lot more choice in the middle. Many years ago I was sent on a Budget Holder course. It advised that anyone using 'quality' to justify a purchase should be re-educated promptly with a baseball bat! The reason is that 'quality' is meaningless in engineering, and that chaps who simply want expensive goods are likely to be lazy or ignorant. Instead, the justification for buying anything should be framed in terms of being 'fit for purpose' and 'value for money'. Both of these have to be defined in advance and depend on what the tools are for. By applying that discipline to purchases you get more goodies for your money. Tools that are 'fit for purpose' in the Duffer Workshop may not be 'fit for purpose' in yours. I'm an amateur, I'm not working to a target, and my tools don't get a hard life. That means I can risk using inexpensive tooling. If a tool breaks or becomes unsatisfactory I buy a new one and don't mind waiting for the replacement to turn up. With patience the tools produce good results. A 'buy cheap' policy works very well for me; for example 20 years ago I bought a cheap mitre saw for a DIY job needing about 100 cuts. Not only did the nasty saw do the job, it's coped with all my other woodwork requirements ever since. The saw is both fit for purpose and excellent value for money. I could have bought a much more expensive example. Had I done so the nice saw wouldn't have been used often enough to be value for money: I'd have wasted cash that I was able to spend usefully elsewhere. The saw isn't an isolated example, most of my tools have been bought after thinking about their value. Consequently I don't really have any favourites or anything to boast about. My attitude would be very different if I earned a living from tools. Then reliability matters much more. So does the need for the tool to finish the job as quickly and neatly as possible, preferably requiring no skill whatever to use it. People who own tools to earn money are rarely nostalgic about them. As soon as something more profitable comes on the market, the old favourite ends up in a skip. There's another valid reason for buying expensive. I have a couple of car/motorbike friends who get their kicks out of owning expensive tools. It makes them more confident and they enjoy using their kit. Nothing wrong with that, even if one of them does over-indulge his bragging rights! They do tend to get their legs pulled and it pays to be wealthy if pleasure in ownership is your motive. In conclusion, you may have to make up your own mind about which boring bar you want. Mine are inexpensive and they work fine in a lathe more powerful than a ML7. Whatever you decide, have fun. Dave |
Ketan Swali | 20/06/2017 17:31:01 |
1481 forum posts 149 photos | Posted by Tony Pratt 1 on 20/06/2017 16:08:55:
Posted by richardandtracy on 20/06/2017 15:32:54:
Well, I don't know what size you're going for, but I got this tiny one: **LINK** in April and have found it perfect for working with pens. 10 inserts + holder for £6.99, if the holder dies on me before the inserts are worn out, I still reckon I'm quids in as it has let me do a job with the money I have, as opposed to putting the job off for years while I try to justify £90 or some other silly price needed to get a branded item. Regards, Richard.
How in gods name are they turning these out for £6.99? Tony A. Bankrupt stock B. Back door stolen stock/rejects, but still okay for hobby guys C. Money laundry for black money Pick one of the above, as ARC cannot even buy it at the price you see on ebay link, from the Chinese manufacturers it works with, nor could/would it be able to consider the said route. Still, if it works for the user, it works. Ketan at ARC. Edited By Ketan Swali on 20/06/2017 17:31:23 Edited By Ketan Swali on 20/06/2017 17:31:43 Edited By Ketan Swali on 20/06/2017 17:43:15 |
Ketan Swali | 20/06/2017 17:34:16 |
1481 forum posts 149 photos | Posted by Clive Brown 1 on 20/06/2017 15:53:58:
I'm interested in this thread. I recently purchased an Arceurotrade indexable boring bar, the low-cost Chinese type with a standard tip. This was to supplement the collection of mainly HSS boring tools used on my Boxford ME10. The attraction was the compact dimensions of the "sharp end" and the avoidance of what can be extensive grinding of HSS to make a shaped tool. I can only say that I'm badly disillusioned. The surface finish is terrible in mild steel, En3, a bit better, but still poor in some tougher stuff, possibly EN8. I've tried ramping up the speed, as seems to be advised in places, but with little improvement. I now see this tool as little better than useless except for the most crude roughing cuts. OK, I must be doing it wrong, would an expensive tip transform things? The bar itself seems reasonably well made and it's held rigidly. I should say that I sometimes use carbide tipped tools for external turning with no real problems. Any advice appreciated! Clive Hi Clive, Can't comment on your predicament, as there are too many variables.. what i can say is that we are happily selling both the Chinese and Sumitomo types in reasonable volume without difficulty. Ketan at ARC. |
Ketan Swali | 20/06/2017 17:41:21 |
1481 forum posts 149 photos | Posted by choochoo_baloo on 20/06/2017 14:41:56:
I now wish to progress onto boring and want to buy an indexable boring tool. Whilst looking through arceurotrade, I realise that I can either go fro the cheapaer Chinese ~£17, or the quality Japanese tools ~£90. I am a very firm believer in buying the most expensive tools one can afford, but have read on here and elsewhere that others achieve excellent results with the former (non-Japanese). So my question is: for a commited newcomer looking to built up a quality tool kit over time, are the unbranded/cheaper indexable boring tools and inserts actually more than good enough (I am using a Myford ML7)? Any advice gratefully received. Edited By choochoo_baloo on 20/06/2017 14:42:17 If you are looking at general hobby work, the Chinese one should do you fine. I am also happy with the Chinese inserts which we sell for it as well as other applications by the bucket load, and we purchase these from a known factory, for its consistency. If you feel doubt, then consider the Sumitomo inserts, as necessary. The Sumitomo holders are designed for production work. They are more rigid, and can deal with deeper holes without flexing, which is more common 'issue' with the cheaper holders. Ketan at ARC. |
John Hinkley | 20/06/2017 19:26:50 |
![]() 1545 forum posts 484 photos | Thanks for the link, Richard ( and Tracy ) - I've just ordered two, mainly for the inserts. I needed a super small boring bar, too, anyway! John |
Neil Wyatt | 20/06/2017 19:51:27 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Clive Brown 1 on 20/06/2017 15:53:58:
I'm interested in this thread. I recently purchased an Arceurotrade indexable boring bar, the low-cost Chinese type with a standard tip. This was to supplement the collection of mainly HSS boring tools used on my Boxford ME10. The attraction was the compact dimensions of the "sharp end" and the avoidance of what can be extensive grinding of HSS to make a shaped tool. I can only say that I'm badly disillusioned. The surface finish is terrible in mild steel, En3, a bit better, but still poor in some tougher stuff, possibly EN8. I've tried ramping up the speed, as seems to be advised in places, but with little improvement. I now see this tool as little better than useless except for the most crude roughing cuts. I've got a carbide-tipped boring bar (not ARC), it only works if you mount it so the centre of the bar is at centre height, rotate it to drop the tip to centre height. If you mount it low and flat so the tip is at centre height, it rubs and does not cut freely, even in a surprisingly large hole. Neil |
JasonB | 20/06/2017 20:00:48 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | As Neil says most of these bars have a minimum hole size, the smaller the hole the more tilt they have on the tip so it does not rub. If you are using one in a smaller hole than it is meant for that may be your problem. Pic I took when the subject came up last time These all come with flats to set the right angle. Edited By JasonB on 20/06/2017 20:01:26 |
Andrew Tinsley | 21/06/2017 10:33:36 |
1817 forum posts 2 photos | Hello, I recently purchased a Chinese external turning tool from Arc and I find it to be problematical. It gives a half decent finish when used to turn down a bar of mild steel, but the finish is awful when facing off. Now I have the highest regard for Arc, especially Ketan, who has spent some considerable time on the phone, helping me out on another topic (and he was paying for the call!). I DO NOT believe that the tool and tip are rubbish! I suspect that I am doing something wrong and I cannot figure out what it is! I am not a raw beginner and have used HSS tools for a long time, achieving very fine finishes when required. I really don't know what I am doing wrong with this tool! It is 6mm square and is being used in a good quality Dickson type tool holder on an ML10. The tip came with the tool. I just wanted to try a tipped tool to see how it faired. Andrew |
Tony Pratt 1 | 21/06/2017 10:42:47 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | Andrew, Mild steel is not always the easiest to get a good finish on at the best of times. Try a new tip on centre height & run the lathe at top rpm. You can try cutting dry or with cutting oil or soluble oil, see how it goes. Tony |
Ketan Swali | 21/06/2017 10:54:28 |
1481 forum posts 149 photos | Posted by Tony Pratt 1 on 21/06/2017 10:42:47:
Andrew, Mild steel is not always the easiest to get a good finish on at the best of times. Try a new tip on centre height & run the lathe at top rpm. You can try cutting dry or with cutting oil or soluble oil, see how it goes. Tony +1 for Tonys suggestion. The holder is fitted with a 0.4 radius tip - insert. In your case, if you are intending to use a new insert, consider trying a 0.8 radius tip - insert CCMT060208. This was a suggestion from the Sumitomo man, but it applies to these Chinese inserts too. Ketan at ARC. Edited By Ketan Swali on 21/06/2017 10:54:47 |
JasonB | 21/06/2017 11:56:03 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Interesting advice Ketan, I have a box of 0.8r tips and seldom use them, they only come out of the box if I want a small internal radius when turning to a shoulder. The rest of the time I tend to use 0.4 or 0.2, one reason s that on slender work I find the larger tip tends to push the work away and give a bad finish.
J |
Ketan Swali | 21/06/2017 12:59:18 |
1481 forum posts 149 photos | Posted by JasonB on 21/06/2017 11:56:03:
Interesting advice Ketan, I have a box of 0.8r tips and seldom use them, they only come out of the box if I want a small internal radius when turning to a shoulder. The rest of the time I tend to use 0.4 or 0.2, one reason s that on slender work I find the larger tip tends to push the work away and give a bad finish. J Hi Jason, You are special Joking aside, you have good experience of using indexable carbide tooling, on your machine, combined with a clear understanding of your machines ability and rigidity. Before considering to sell any carbide insert based lathe tools, I had a list of questions for the technical sales guy from Sumitomo. NOTE: I am a fan of HSS tooling over carbide for general use on hobby or manual machines in a hobby environment. High speeds experimenting or use with carbide on such machines scares me, but that would be due to lack of experience. The questions came out of observations at the shows we attended. At the shows, debates were had on HSS vs carbide. For carbide stuff, I used to direct enquirers to Jenni - JB Tools who I consider to be great for this stuff. However time and again, a certain percentage of users would come back to me with comments of disappointment after buying stuff from her. Something failed to add up. As far as I was concerned, JB Tools could not have been at fault. I raised these points at that time with the Sumitomo guy some seven to eight years ago. This guy went on technical sales visits to factories around the U.K. offering solutions to the users. He explained: 1. Generally inserts are designed for use with CNC machines working at speeds which are much higher then the manual machines with which we work. 2. With manual machines, for general use, people buying stuff off Jennie may have purchased inserts less than 0.4r... If so, the probability of such inserts chipping or failing to give them a suitable result are high on manual machines, because most manual machines just don't have the rigidity to use fine radius inserts. 3. Combine point 2 with user ability and experience. He came across this during factory visits. Such users still wished to use carbide stuff. So, he suggested 0.4r for finer finishes, and 0.8r for general use, provided such machines were rigid enough, especially at higher speeds, be it the tool post or the headstock assembly. 4. For boring tools, i have put across what he told me. Also, he said that the fact that a boring tool holder is long, does not necessarily mean that it can extend out of the tool post at great length, without having a compromising effect - flex or vibration. Same comment applied to normal square holders. So, I believe that the answer is more complex due to the variables involved. Having visited the factory where the inserts are made, they are 'state-of-the art' with Swiss machines, and so clean that you can eat off the floor!. So variables: holder?, insert?, machine toolpost/headstock?, user ability? Ketan at ARC.
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.