Phil H1 | 13/11/2016 20:25:17 |
467 forum posts 60 photos | Does anybody have any experience with the use of drawn brass bar for the fabrication of 3 1/2" gauge locomotive cylinders? I can understand the need to exclude brass from a boiler but is it any use for cylinders (with the correct piston material and the use of 'o' rings etc)?. Phil H |
Another JohnS | 13/11/2016 20:46:33 |
842 forum posts 56 photos | Phil; Kozo Hiraoka's "Building the New Shay" specifies brass, with "O" rings on pistons. His previous books specified copper-tin bronze, with graphite packing. The Gauge 1 builders (e.g. "Project" design) use brass for the cylinder(s). I've no direct experience, but others design this way - I'd assume it would be ok. John. |
julian atkins | 13/11/2016 23:34:10 |
![]() 1285 forum posts 353 photos | The problem with fabrication if silver soldering the parts together is that the brass will be soft. It can be age hardened. I dont know of a quicker process. I remember LBSC stating even phos bronze/gunmetal should not be silver soldered for cylinder and valve parts as it significantly affects the wearing properties. Whether this is correct or not I dont know myself. Generally one should avoid brass in cylinder parts as it wears badly anyway compared to gunmetal castings or bronze. If you are building a 3.5"g loco it would be a shame to spoil it by not using the correct materials for the job. Cheers, Julian |
mick H | 14/11/2016 05:36:59 |
795 forum posts 34 photos | I am a Gauge 1 type and invariably use brass for cylinders, but, at this small scale "O" rings are usually used as piston rings so that there is little or no wear in the cylinder walls. Whether this is possible in larger scales I have no idea but I would tend to take the advice given by Julian if I were investing the time, effort and expense in building a 31/2" loco. Mick |
MW | 14/11/2016 06:24:28 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | Posted by julian atkins on 13/11/2016 23:34:10:
If you are building a 3.5"g loco it would be a shame to spoil it by not using the correct materials for the job. Cheers, Julian Agreed, it's disappointing to be told to need to change things; it's better to try again for the sake of a better outcome and at least one now knows more than one did the first time around. Michael W Edited By Michael Walters on 14/11/2016 06:25:30 |
Ian S C | 14/11/2016 10:25:10 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | If the cylinders were to have liners, softening by heating would not be a problem, although you might want to put something harder on the valve face, but I can't see a difficulty there. Ian S C |
Phil H1 | 14/11/2016 13:58:00 |
467 forum posts 60 photos | Thanks for the answers chaps. Perhaps I should have been more specific because my main concern was not the wear. My main concern was how the material behaves in contact with superheated steam followed by wet soggy steam, water and oil etc One of the reasons for asking is that I notice many of the steam and water valves that you can buy definitely specify a brass body rather than bronze or gunmetal. Again I understand that valves can be replaced but what happens to the brass bodies and seats? Do they basically corrode and fail or start passing within a relatively short service time? Does brass just go orrible but gunmetal remains relatively clean and unharmed? PhilH |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.