Chris Smith 20 | 03/06/2016 18:37:53 |
10 forum posts | Hi. I am interested in the Dore Westbury milling machines and I am struggling to find any details about milling capacity of the machine. I am aware that the machine was designed for light use but how light is light? A friend of mine has a MK1 and says that the best cut with a 6mm end mill is approx 5 thou when milling steel and a little better on Ali etc. Is this correct? Compared to the more modern Chinese mills available on the market for between 5 and 7 hundred pounds, what sort of capacity can they cope with? All sensible advise gratefully appreciated please. Regards Chris
|
John P | 03/06/2016 20:54:09 |
451 forum posts 268 photos | Hi Chris,
|
Chris Smith 20 | 03/06/2016 21:00:31 |
10 forum posts | Hi John. Thanks for this. I am quite taken with the machine as a whole and have wanted one for some years but hearing that the cut was very limited has put me off. I wonder if the machine I know of has a bit of a problem, something simple to sort out. I think the head needs new bearings which would not be a problem for me. The unit is an early MK1 with a four speed pulley and no speed reducer unit on the head which is fine. I'm puzzled why the machine in question will only make VERY light cuts. The motor seems ok and works well at all speeds on the pulleys. What do you reckon could be the problem please? Chris
|
Dave Halford | 03/06/2016 21:04:35 |
2536 forum posts 24 photos | I believe Dore Westbury are home built, so accurate? Maybe. The modern chinese electrics can be affected by damp workshops. Old british bench mills can be worn and a lot wont plunge due to a lack of quill, but will take a big cut if that's your thing. The most info on the web seems to be about the Chinese. Go after which ever bothers you the least. I went Centec, I've not regretted it. |
Chris Smith 20 | 03/06/2016 21:12:24 |
10 forum posts | Hi Dave. Interesting, thanks. I am wary of the Chinese kit and would need a good bit of persuasion to buy one. I was at the big Doncaster show a couple of weeks ago (very enjoyable) and had a look at what was on offer, all seemed rather flimsy and the castings were of poor finish and quality was a bit hurried if you know what I mean, hence the interest in the DW. Chris
|
Robbo | 03/06/2016 21:14:19 |
1504 forum posts 142 photos | Chris, The motors originally recommended for the Dore-Westbury was 1/3HP for the Mk1 and 1/2HP for the Mk2 (to be able to use the higher speeds of the Mk2). This might give you a clue as to the intended use, though choice of motor was down to the individual builder. |
Chris Smith 20 | 03/06/2016 21:17:25 |
10 forum posts | Hi Robbo. I think that the unit in question probably has a 1/4 HP motor fitted. Chris
|
Nick_G | 03/06/2016 21:27:50 |
![]() 1808 forum posts 744 photos | . I have never owned a DW so I maybe jumping ( unfairly ) to conclusions here. They for whatever reason they seem to command 'top dollar' on THAT auction site. ............ Perhaps it's the name.? I would think you would get far more bang for your buck with something like a Centec ( so long as you can find a decent one) With a DW you may end up with a good bit of kit depending on who made it. Or so to speak a bag of dirty washing. The price recently has been climbing on such milling machines as the SX3 but they still represent good value from a credible retailer. Again I might be talking through my ar$e but I 'think' that an SX3 would show either of the above a clean pair of heels. Nick |
Chris Smith 20 | 03/06/2016 21:37:21 |
10 forum posts | Hi Nick. Thanks, yet more food for thought. The S X3 looks a good bit of kit but is outside of my budget whereas the DW I have my eye on (not on a website) is. A lottery win would help........ Chris
|
Kettrinboy | 03/06/2016 22:07:24 |
94 forum posts 49 photos | Hi Chris Ive owned a DW MK1 for 35 yrs now , i think it was originally built in 1977-78, a 5 thou cut with a 6mm cutter is nowhere near what a DW in decent condition should manage , on mine a 6mm FC3 type cutter could do 2mm a cut in mild steel and probably 4-5mm in say 6082 aluminium with coolant which makes a big difference btw , as nearly all are home built the standards of machining vary a lot and i found that after i bought mine it needed the angular contact bearing housings in the quill sleeving and reboring as they had been made oversize , one of them was 10 thou over so nowhere near good enough and i also ended up having to make a complete new spindle at work as the morse taper in the spindle nose was 8 thou out of true and very ridged , plus the top keyways were way out of line, still having done all that and a few other details its been a damn good machine since , i wouldnt worry about not having the backgear , i only ever use that for slitting saw work but you could probably get away with using bigger pulleys to slow the spindle down enough for a smaller size saw , i find the 1/4 HP motor good for up to 12mm/1/2 inch cutters and bigger ones than that used with care, it was not meant to be a tool room standard machine nor a production machine but it was designed as a light hobby machine that was easy....ish to complete on a Myford/Boxford size lathe and so as long as you dont try to take big cuts and try to force it but just use feel to see what its capable of it does a more than good enough job for most modelwork , i,m still not tempted to go for a replacement yet as mine still does the job for me. regards Geoff Edited By Kettrinboy on 03/06/2016 22:12:24 |
Chris Smith 20 | 03/06/2016 22:21:56 |
10 forum posts | Hi Geoff. Well, that's a big vote indeed for the DW. I am feeling more confident now. The unit in question was made by a toolmaker and the compound table is a work of art. I think a change of head bearings will sort most of the issues and perhaps a decent Collect chuck. I have seen a DW with a really good pulley layout which gave it a really slow speed at one end of the spectrum and about 2500 RPM at the higher end. Might go for that and swap out the belts for poly v type which are said to be better. Thank you !
Chris
|
Kettrinboy | 04/06/2016 08:12:58 |
94 forum posts 49 photos | Hi Chris as far as cutter holding is concerned i use MT2 collets rather than a chuck , it keeps cutters closer to the spindle nose and they run truer and also improves rigidity when using bigger cutters , that said though i must admit an ER16 or 25 chuck is handy for holding odd size drills and cutters. regards Geoff |
Neil Wyatt | 04/06/2016 09:18:31 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | 5 thou with a 6mm endmill is just a recipe for blunting endmills. As people have said a DW should capable of more. It's broadly comparable to a rigid column X2 type machine in size and rigidity so performance should be similar, at least 1/16" in steel with a 1/2" endmill. As many DW's were home built from a kit of part-machined bits, performance may vary, but I think the dovetails and gibs were machined so you should be able to set them for good performance. Obviously it also depends on the size of motor fitted. Neil |
Bob Brown 1 | 04/06/2016 11:54:24 |
![]() 1022 forum posts 127 photos | Dove tails? no dove tails similar to a Myford. **LINK** |
Neil Wyatt | 04/06/2016 17:38:17 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Bob Brown 1 on 04/06/2016 11:54:24:
Dove tails? no dove tails similar to a Myford. **LINK** Interesting - never noticed that before!
For comparison purposes, I did a bit of milling today on my old-style (but stiffened up) X2 mill, no problems either climb or conventional cuts: Toughened steel (jig blocks for a vice) 2.5mm depth of cut, 1.5mm width of cut, feed about 180mm/min 6028 Aluminium alloy ~ 4mm DOC (it was angled) 7mm width of cut, feed as fast as I could turn the handle. I used two 10mm carbide cutters run at about 1200 rpm, one meant for steel and the other for aluminium. I can't see any reason why you couldn't do similar cuts on a well set up Dore Westbury. |
Chris Smith 20 | 04/06/2016 21:53:04 |
10 forum posts | Hi Everyone. Thanks for the responses, brilliant. I note that the slides on the unit I am considering has dovetails, it was one of the earliest but a MK1 DW not a Westbury (so I am aware). I think I will go for the DW and replace the head bearings.
Neil. Whilst I think about it, how aboutv this as an idea for an article in ME Workshop please? I find all the different types of Tungsten carbide disposable tips a bit daunting as a new comer to using them (have used HSS all my life) and would be grateful for someone in the magazine to do a simple write up about them, how to choose them (different shapes, styles, usage on different metals etc) and what to use as a newcomer as a way of getting used to using them . Thanks
Chris
|
Neil Wyatt | 04/06/2016 22:14:12 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Yes it has been suggested before, as a convert to carbide I have asked someone for an article. The cutters I was using are solid carbide not inserts (and despite comments elsewhere are sharp as a razor). Neil |
Chris Smith 20 | 05/06/2016 20:21:36 |
10 forum posts | Hi Neil, great, look forward to reading and learning from it.
Regards
Chris
|
George Archer | 12/07/2016 01:59:42 |
5 forum posts | I'm surprised no one has mentioned this already, the Dore Westbury was designed by Arnold Throp who developed the design from Mr Westbury's original to make it easier to build in a home lathe only workshop and arranged for any machining outside the builders resources to be done by his own engineering company Dore Engineering hence the double barreled name. What is relevant to the present thread is that he is also the author of Vol 2 of the workshop Practice Series of books "Vertical Milling in the Home Workshop" 1st published 1977, and still in print i.e.. pre Chinese imports, therefore the book is basically the Dore Westbury manual and the speed/depth of cut/material data found in table III on page67 can be considered advice from the horses mouth so to speak. I can confirm these cuts/speeds work very well on my Dore Westbury as does the rest of the advise in the little book Edited By George Archer on 12/07/2016 02:04:25 |
Robbo | 12/07/2016 09:39:24 |
1504 forum posts 142 photos | George, I did think about putting Arnold Throp's tables from the book on here, then realised it was still in print as part of the Workshop Practice series, so thought I' better not. My own copy of the book is a 1979 edition before it became part of the series. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.