martin baker | 15/11/2015 17:09:03 |
![]() 11 forum posts 12 photos |
Edited By martin baker on 15/11/2015 17:26:25 |
Michael Gilligan | 15/11/2015 17:16:44 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Martin, Sorry to say, your 'image' is missing, and your album only contains two Myford pictures. MichaelG. |
martin baker | 15/11/2015 17:28:29 |
![]() 11 forum posts 12 photos | Sorry having problems with adding the image but have done it now I think. Martin. |
Michael Gilligan | 15/11/2015 17:41:28 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Yes; Image is there now, Martin Unfortunately, I don't immediately recognise it. ... I may be back [but don't hold your breath !] MichaelG. . Edit: this page has a cross-sectional drawing, taken from the Patent, but shows nothing that I recognise as your component. [Both of mine are incomplete, and presently inaccessible]
Edited By Michael Gilligan on 15/11/2015 17:50:11 |
Phil P | 15/11/2015 17:48:18 |
851 forum posts 206 photos | I does not look like part of a Mardrive to me, I have the type that is built into a lathe cabinet and there is nothing like that part in it. Phil |
Neil Wyatt | 15/11/2015 17:50:16 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | It looks like the sprung roller of a limit switch to me? Neil |
Michael Gilligan | 15/11/2015 22:04:31 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | I don't think it will help, but here & here & here are the early Patents Note the somewhat surprising Applicant. MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 15/11/2015 22:08:11 Edited By Michael Gilligan on 15/11/2015 22:10:09 |
Arthur Sixsmith | 15/11/2015 23:04:37 |
18 forum posts | We used this type of clutch/motor on sewing machines. The spring and roller whent down the motor shaft to keep the flywheel and pulley apart. Hope this helps Arthur |
Michael Gilligan | 15/11/2015 23:38:11 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Arthur, So ... is it item 'd' on the sectional drawing? I felt sure that mine just had a 'button' ... but the roller would make sense. Thanks for joining us. MichaelG |
Phil P | 16/11/2015 00:00:54 |
851 forum posts 206 photos | I can tell you for sure item D is just a short pushrod with a spring connected to the back end of it. In normal operation the clutch friction ring is held apart by this spring so it does not drive, when the pedal is pressed it pushes the cone pulley inwards and contacts the friction ring thus taking up drive until the pedal is released. I reckon the part in the photo is from somewhere/something else.
Not sure why the patent applicants name is surprising, mine has the 'Marine Engineering Co' name on the main motor plate. That is where the name "Mar" drive comes from isn't it ? Phil |
Michael Gilligan | 16/11/2015 00:39:47 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Phil P on 16/11/2015 00:00:54:
Not sure why the patent applicants name is surprising, mine has the 'Marine Engineering Co' name on the main motor plate. That is where the name "Mar" drive comes from isn't it ? Phil . Yes, Phil ... It is obvious when you already know [which I did], or if you happen to have an original motor with that nameplate [one of mine does, the other does not]. But anyone presuming that the famous Pultra MarDrive unit might be the intellectual property of Pultra would probably struggle to find the Patents. I was just trying to help, by putting a little more information where people might easily find it. MichaelG. |
Phil P | 16/11/2015 07:28:15 |
851 forum posts 206 photos | From the way you worded it, it sounded like "you" were surprised by the patent application name. You could have explained it to everyone if you had wanted to. Perhaps I had better mind my own business in future posts of yours if I have spoken out of turn. Phil |
Michael Gilligan | 16/11/2015 07:48:45 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Phil P on 16/11/2015 07:28:15:
From the way you worded it, it sounded like "you" were surprised by the patent application name. You could have explained it to everyone if you had wanted to. Perhaps I had better mind my own business in future posts of yours if I have spoken out of turn. Phil . Phil, No, I don't think you have spoken out of turn ... but, equally, I didn't think it was worth 'explaining it' There has been enough nonsense on this forum in recent days; let's just all work together. MichaelG.
|
martin baker | 16/11/2015 19:00:08 |
![]() 11 forum posts 12 photos | Thanks to you all. |
Ajohnw | 16/11/2015 23:18:32 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | Not sure but this page shows some copies of drawing from the patent but near the top is a "photo" of a cord passing over a pulley to operate the clutch. It's not clear but it looks like something like your part might be connected to the cord. John - |
Michael Gilligan | 17/11/2015 10:10:31 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by John W1 on 16/11/2015 23:18:32:
... a "photo" of a cord passing over a pulley to operate the clutch. It's not clear but it looks like something like your part might be connected to the cord. . John, For info. ... That 'cord' was a chain [lightweight flat links] There is a very useful little video, here, showing a bench-mount MarDrive unit in very original-looking condition. MichaelG.
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.