am after some pointers on how i can precisely mount a large and long square bar in a lathe for turning?
Les Jones 1 | 07/03/2014 09:35:29 |
2292 forum posts 159 photos | I totally agree with MichaelG's comments as what is accurate in one context is not necessarily accurate in another. One suggestion about marking the centre is to use an adjustable set square like a depth gauge and scribe lines from all four sides. Even if the marks are not at the exact centre the square formed between the lines should enable the centre punch to be positioned reasonably accurately. (I would think within a couple of thou.) If this is not accurate enough then this two step approach would help. Set a length of the bar a little longer than the finished size between the four jaw chuck and this marked centre. Clock the end in the chuck to be true. Turn a circular section close to the chuck that will fit in the fixed steady. Cut off the square section that was in the chuck. Mount the other end in the chuck and true it up first at the chuck end then the round section at the far end. Now carefully set the fixed steady to support the round section. This should reduce any error due to the position of the original centre mark. Les. |
Nobby | 07/03/2014 09:57:49 |
![]() 587 forum posts 113 photos | Hi
|
TimS | 07/03/2014 15:56:33 |
20 forum posts | Thanks for even more replys using square bar was more of a thought exercise as i had planned on using round (which would seem to make the whole exercise a lot simpler) i usually over complicate things or overlook the obvious so i thought this would be the place to ask... and as usual i pick a question with multiple answers all of which spawn even more questions however reading all this has brought to my attention that my problem could well be more psychological than technological; a hammer and centre doesn't feel precise... maybe thats just lack of experience but thats why i asked the question; i had never seen it in a book... well not one with bar that didnt fit through the headstock so guessed there was a good reason for this thanks again and i will keep reading all your replys |
Steven Vine | 07/03/2014 16:38:20 |
340 forum posts 30 photos | Crikey Tim, that's a bit of a let down and feels like a bit of a time waster. I was following this thread closely and giving the square bar problem a lot of thought. Steve |
jason udall | 07/03/2014 17:24:57 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | Lathes are arguably the oldest machine tool.. (drawings for Egyptian verticle spindle devices) The need for say two truely round portions / concentric and idealy parallel is as old as the wheel.. To an extent the section between could be as irregular as the tree it was cut from.. . These would be spun between centers (simple points) and a tool held so as to shape the stock.. Scroll on a millennium or four.. We have bearings and a chuck with an electric motor spinning it... ( we even have watchmakers "turns" bearing a close family resemblance to our basic lathe)...thus we chuck up the stock or face plate etc. And turn..now to support the far end we use either a center or a steady.. In any case the prime purpose remains the same..rotate stock about a centerline and remove stock.. Jim ..to turndown a square involves an interupted cut which requires much firmer grip on the stock.. It really is a VERY different job. |
jason udall | 07/03/2014 17:38:10 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | From experience .turning rounds on "square"..is often..less than pleasing..the stock is not quite square..or is less than parallel. .and thus the blend from square to round is uneven.. As to precise. .center punching to at least the regularity of the stock is possible. .I would use the clock makers "trick" of a mounted drill bit instead of center punch and just spin between fingers to create mark.. A 1mm pilot centerdrill is my choice here Check against scribed lines and " adjust" if required.. |
TimS | 08/03/2014 06:49:24 |
20 forum posts | I'm sorry that this becoming a thought exercise is a let down but it has become very obvious to me that this is outside the scope of my machining abilities a piece made from square bar would be much better than one made from round but i know i can solve any centre mark issues with the first cuts by turning the whole surface of the bar in the lathe, making a boss at the same time so I end up with an exact piece that i know will be both parallel and concentric (assuming tailstock alignment) if i had stuck with using square then i would need to accurately machine the 4 faces of the cast iron bar to remove the scale in the mill, hope my machining skills are good enough to ensure that i end up with an exact square, centre mark the ends accurately, drill precise centre points and do my best to get a level of accuracy i dont think i can achieve, turn the boss; and hope all is accurate... i also dont have the kit or any experience with using precise measuring equipment to ensure that all is well with a square piece... round however makes all of that a lot simpler, and for me thats quite important; i am willing to sacrifice a far more ideal shape for the guarantee of precision... and precision is why i asked this question in the first place apologies again if i have wasted your time |
Michael Gilligan | 08/03/2014 07:53:32 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Tim, I don't think there is any real harm done At least this thread stands as a record of some useful ponderings. ... and it even stayed "on-topic" MichaelG. |
Les Jones 1 | 08/03/2014 08:57:42 |
2292 forum posts 159 photos | Hi Tim, Les. |
TimS | 08/03/2014 09:19:39 |
20 forum posts | Thanks Michael and Michael; there isnt so much of a design problem as just an alternative; the same size square bar has more mass than a round of the same diameter but obviously makes the machining more challenging... and opens me up to a whole load of extra work and potential errors essentially i can get by with one flat side so to produce this accurately i was going to: its probably now aparant that i dont trust my abilities that much but i wanted a way that would introduce as few potential errors as possible... and the only way i thought of ensuring that is to do it at the same time without the need to clock anything if i have missed something that will cause me problems feel free to say as this is one of the only routes i knew that could ensure accuracy without having to measure each mouting etc etc. obviously i would clock it and not trust i hadnt made any mistakes in the setup... but its more confirmation than location |
jason udall | 08/03/2014 09:27:17 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | Edit..crossed with above post
I hope I didn't seem grumpy. In the absence of your actual "requirements"..it is un surprising that my or anyone elses suggestions are off target.. Lets say you want a bar with concentric and parallel "journals" on either end. Of defined diameter. Between those journals you need flats for convenience. . You have a mill of such and such a scope. You have a lathe of such and such center height and between centers . Me I might start with square Mark centers.drill centers ..mount between centers on mill...mill flats flat at "required" locations..mount on lathe between centers and check flats..when happy with flats.. Turn boss as required.. You now have bosses concentic With each other and referenced to the flats. . This still leaves the issue of blend But if you do the above with round stock and turn all over you get the flats as required and a concentric part... Edited By jason udall on 08/03/2014 09:30:10 |
Ian S C | 08/03/2014 11:24:54 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | I was thinking of mounting the bar between centres on the mill with a rotary table at one end, and cutting the required round section with an end mill. Would that work? there is , what ever method used, the problem of an accurate centre, in this case possibly at both ends, unless the table end is a 4 jaw chuck. That's the trouble with thinking. Ian S C |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.