By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Precisely Holding Long Square Bar in Lathe for Turning

am after some pointers on how i can precisely mount a large and long square bar in a lathe for turning?

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Les Jones 107/03/2014 09:35:29
2292 forum posts
159 photos

I totally agree with MichaelG's comments as what is accurate in one context is not necessarily accurate in another. One suggestion about marking the centre is to use an adjustable set square like a depth gauge and scribe lines from all four sides. Even if the marks are not at the exact centre the square formed between the lines should enable the centre punch to be positioned reasonably accurately. (I would think within a couple of thou.) If this is not accurate enough then this two step approach would help. Set a length of the bar a little longer than the finished size between the four jaw chuck and this marked centre. Clock the end in the chuck to be true. Turn a circular section close to the chuck that will fit in the fixed steady. Cut off the square section that was in the chuck. Mount the other end in the chuck and true it up first at the chuck end then the round section at the far end. Now carefully set the fixed steady to support the round section. This should reduce any error due to the position of the original centre mark.

Les.

Nobby07/03/2014 09:57:49
avatar
587 forum posts
113 photos

Hi
In terms of home shop machinist with no CNC no Dro Set odd leg calliper to 35mm mark from 4 sides similar to Les's idea if you can get it under you drill clamped to an angle plate . put a sticky pin on centre drill pick up the line by moving into position then centre drill
Nobby.

TimS07/03/2014 15:56:33
20 forum posts

Thanks for even more replys i haven't had time to process all of them and as regards to accuracy thats a very good question, i hadn't actually considered that as this is my first really precise job... and i dont much like numbers so only tend to think of them as a last resort :/

using square bar was more of a thought exercise as i had planned on using round (which would seem to make the whole exercise a lot simpler) i usually over complicate things or overlook the obvious so i thought this would be the place to ask... and as usual i pick a question with multiple answers all of which spawn even more questions

however reading all this has brought to my attention that my problem could well be more psychological than technological; a hammer and centre doesn't feel precise... maybe thats just lack of experience but thats why i asked the question; i had never seen it in a book... well not one with bar that didnt fit through the headstock so guessed there was a good reason for this

thanks again and i will keep reading all your replys tim

Steven Vine07/03/2014 16:38:20
340 forum posts
30 photos

Crikey Tim, that's a bit of a let down and feels like a bit of a time waster. I was following this thread closely and giving the square bar problem a lot of thought.

Steve

jason udall07/03/2014 17:24:57
2032 forum posts
41 photos
Lathes are arguably the oldest machine tool.. (drawings for Egyptian verticle spindle devices)
The need for say two truely round portions / concentric and idealy parallel is as old as the wheel..
To an extent the section between could be as irregular as the tree it was cut from..
.
These would be spun between centers (simple points) and a tool held so as to shape the stock..
Scroll on a millennium or four..
We have bearings and a chuck with an electric motor spinning it...
( we even have watchmakers "turns" bearing a close family resemblance to our basic lathe)...thus we chuck up the stock or face plate etc. And turn..now to support the far end we use either a center or a steady..

In any case the prime purpose remains the same..rotate stock about a centerline and remove stock..
Jim ..to turndown a square involves an interupted cut which requires much firmer grip on the stock..
It really is a VERY different job.
jason udall07/03/2014 17:38:10
2032 forum posts
41 photos
From experience
.turning rounds on "square"..is often..less than pleasing..the stock is not quite square..or is less than parallel. .and thus the blend from square to round is uneven..
As to precise. .center punching to at least the regularity of the stock is possible. .I would use the clock makers "trick" of a mounted drill bit instead of center punch and just spin between fingers to create mark..
A 1mm pilot centerdrill is my choice here
Check against scribed lines and " adjust" if required..
TimS08/03/2014 06:49:24
20 forum posts

I'm sorry that this becoming a thought exercise is a let down but it has become very obvious to me that this is outside the scope of my machining abilities

a piece made from square bar would be much better than one made from round but i know i can solve any centre mark issues with the first cuts by turning the whole surface of the bar in the lathe, making a boss at the same time so I end up with an exact piece that i know will be both parallel and concentric (assuming tailstock alignment)

if i had stuck with using square then i would need to accurately machine the 4 faces of the cast iron bar to remove the scale in the mill, hope my machining skills are good enough to ensure that i end up with an exact square, centre mark the ends accurately, drill precise centre points and do my best to get a level of accuracy i dont think i can achieve, turn the boss; and hope all is accurate... i also dont have the kit or any experience with using precise measuring equipment to ensure that all is well with a square piece... round however makes all of that a lot simpler, and for me thats quite important; i am willing to sacrifice a far more ideal shape for the guarantee of precision... and precision is why i asked this question in the first place

apologies again if i have wasted your time

Michael Gilligan08/03/2014 07:53:32
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos

Tim,

I don't think there is any real harm done

At least this thread stands as a record of some useful ponderings.

... and it even stayed "on-topic"

MichaelG.

Les Jones 108/03/2014 08:57:42
2292 forum posts
159 photos

Hi Tim,
I think any discussion like this is interesting as suggestions made could be useful in other situations.
What is useful when asking questions is to give more information about what equipment you have access to.
Also particularly as you could not give an indication of the tolerance required information about the item you are making would give a clue about the accuracy required. For example it could have been a shaft to fit a pulley that had a square hole with a bearing at each end running at a few hundred rpm or is could have been a shaft for a high speed turbine running at 100000 rpm. If it was the first case then plus or minus 10 thou would be good enough. If it was the second case I doubt if any of us on this forum could make it accurately enough.

Les.

TimS08/03/2014 09:19:39
20 forum posts

Thanks Michael and Michael; there isnt so much of a design problem as just an alternative; the same size square bar has more mass than a round of the same diameter but obviously makes the machining more challenging... and opens me up to a whole load of extra work and potential errors

essentially i can get by with one flat side so to produce this accurately i was going to:
1. turn the whole outside of the bar and boss at one setting (or between centres)
2. bolt some sacrificial pieces to my Mill and cut V's into them in situe
3. mount the round bar in those V's (thus fixing any alignment issues with my mill table and ensuring that everything runs true)
4. Mill the top face to size and do any other work to finish it; then remove once its finished (i figured doing it all at once is a good way to ensure everything is all on the same plane and i have none of the problems of setting it all square again if i were to remove and remount)

its probably now aparant that i dont trust my abilities that much but i wanted a way that would introduce as few potential errors as possible... and the only way i thought of ensuring that is to do it at the same time without the need to clock anything

if i have missed something that will cause me problems feel free to say as this is one of the only routes i knew that could ensure accuracy without having to measure each mouting etc etc. obviously i would clock it and not trust i hadnt made any mistakes in the setup... but its more confirmation than location

jason udall08/03/2014 09:27:17
2032 forum posts
41 photos
Edit..crossed with above post I hope I didn't seem grumpy.


In the absence of your actual "requirements"..it is un surprising that my or anyone elses suggestions are off target..

Lets say you want a bar with concentric and parallel "journals" on either end. Of defined diameter.
Between those journals you need flats for convenience. .
You have a mill of such and such a scope.
You have a lathe of such and such center height and between centers

.
Me I might start with square

Mark centers.drill centers ..mount between centers on mill...mill flats flat at "required" locations..mount on lathe between centers and check flats..when happy with flats..
Turn boss as required..
You now have bosses concentic With each other and referenced to the flats. .

This still leaves the issue of blend

But if you do the above with round stock and turn all over you get the flats as required and a concentric part...

Edited By jason udall on 08/03/2014 09:30:10

Ian S C08/03/2014 11:24:54
avatar
7468 forum posts
230 photos

I was thinking of mounting the bar between centres on the mill with a rotary table at one end, and cutting the required round section with an end mill. Would that work? there is , what ever method used, the problem of an accurate centre, in this case possibly at both ends, unless the table end is a 4 jaw chuck. That's the trouble with thinking.

Ian S C

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate