Bad work from Stuart Model.
Jens Eirik Skogstad | 24/09/2012 17:50:53 |
![]() 400 forum posts 22 photos |
Hi all folks! As Will Robertson is showing the cylinder with coarse work of the cylinder surface. It is same manner as my Stuart D10 was bought as a machined kit from Stuart Models. I was disappointed of their qualiy work was horrible. Then i am thinking.. how to complain to Stuart Models for their bad work at machined kit??? Sure not easy in case it is too many kit with bad quality of work was sold and zero complain to Stuart Models and, they is still producing the steam engine kit.. Jens Eirik |
NJH | 24/09/2012 18:16:59 |
![]() 2314 forum posts 139 photos | Jens The ownership of Stuart models has, I believe, changed very recently. Best not to tar the new owners with the brush of bad service. If you look at their website HERE you will find contact and model details. Norman |
Jens Eirik Skogstad | 24/09/2012 19:20:34 |
![]() 400 forum posts 22 photos | In case the new owners had taken over production of Stuart Models, the time will show for the new owners when it is demanded by buyers that quality must be the same as in old days before the new owners has taken over production of the Stuart steam engines. Too expensive to buy a Stuart steam engine when work is simply not well done since we have to spend extra time and materials to make a usable steam engine. My experience from Stuart D10 machined kit: Poor fit, sloppery parts, not refined surface by honing and polishing of moving parts. Mostly coarse work!
|
JasonB | 24/09/2012 19:51:55 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | A machined kit it is just that - machined, not fine finished and fitted, that is upto the buyer and to be fair Stuarts say that the kits are "The components are all turned, milled, drilled and threaded" why else would they say files are required if you are not expected to do some work on the parts. They only state "polished" on the ready to run engines. Same applies to things like the Steam Traction World kits, you could just bolt it together and get a woorking but not good looking engien of you could spend time removing mill scale, machining marks etc and have a nice engine after quite a few hours work. Edited By JasonB on 24/09/2012 19:52:09 |
Stub Mandrel | 24/09/2012 20:31:49 |
![]() 4318 forum posts 291 photos 1 articles | To be fair, I can't see anything wrong with the cylinder bore in the photo. A good turned finish should be fine; It's not usual to hone and polish the bore on a steam engine. Neil |
JasonB | 24/09/2012 20:35:40 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Stub, thats not the one from a machined Stuart kit, its Will's one and if you look athe other photos you will see some machining marks, he wants to fit O rings so a machined bore will rip then up and that is why honing lapping was suggested. Edited By JasonB on 24/09/2012 20:39:51 |
Jens Eirik Skogstad | 24/09/2012 20:46:44 |
![]() 400 forum posts 22 photos |
Instructions that came with the machined kit is not written that part must be reworked... Just assembly the whole set of steam engine. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.