Rotary broaching
Daniel Brannan | 02/07/2023 13:42:38 |
42 forum posts 8 photos | Hi I’m stuck. I made a wheel spindle, one end of which needs a 19mm hex cutting Into it . I bought a 19mm carbide rotary broach from a respected toolmaker, oversized the pilot hole to 19.2mm, chamfered it and then tried to cut. But nothing happens. The broach makes contact with the workpiece and spins with it but doesn’t cut whatsoever. I’ve tried what I consider heavy insertion force and still nothing. Has anyone done this before? How much insertion force does this require? Everything I’ve read just says rotary broaching is dead easy and requires little force It’s 7050 aluminium. I’ve tried increasing the pilot Hole to just over 20mm but that’s as far as I dare go as the major diameter of the broach is only about 22mm
thanks as always
Dan |
JasonB | 02/07/2023 13:59:51 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | The broaches need to go into a special holder that allows them to "wobble" and work their way down into a hole. You can't just force them into the hole like a push or pull broach |
Daniel Brannan | 02/07/2023 14:02:30 |
42 forum posts 8 photos | Hi thanks. Yeah I forgot to say I do have a rotary broach holder - when you spin the broach independently you can see the 1 degree wobble |
Tony Pratt 1 | 02/07/2023 14:55:13 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | Following with interest as I had a similar problem. Is the broach holder a decent make, mine was a Chinese offering and just didn't work? Tony |
Daniel Brannan | 02/07/2023 15:04:11 |
42 forum posts 8 photos | Yeah it’s a cheap Chinese one from eBay. Like I say though you can see the wobble so surely it should work? Who knows I never did understand the principle really as surely once the part is in contact with the broach, nothing is ‘wobbling’, all that is happening is one part of the broach is ahead of the others. Obviously it’s clever people than me that came up with this though 🙂 |
JasonB | 02/07/2023 15:04:23 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | This maker gives the pilot hole for their 19mm hex as 19.75mm so you were possibly small to start with, also check your chamfer The wobble puts the force onto each corner in turn which is more effective than trying to cut them all at once Edited By JasonB on 02/07/2023 15:05:36 |
Daniel Brannan | 02/07/2023 15:12:28 |
42 forum posts 8 photos | Thanks. Chamfer is 45 degrees and just slightly wider than the widest point of the broach. I did debate going to 21mm for the pilot but I’ll only have 1/2 a mm all the way round to support the corners of the hex |
Macolm | 02/07/2023 15:35:14 |
![]() 185 forum posts 33 photos | Also interested in this as it is on the list to try. Surely though, the broach should not “wobble” when rotated, merely rotate on an axis one degree displaced from the rotation axis of the work. Presumably also the broach is advanced along the work axis, not its own rotation axis.
Edited By Macolm on 02/07/2023 15:37:58 |
Tony Pratt 1 | 02/07/2023 17:39:48 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | We don’t need to reinvent the wheel, rotary broaching is a proven technique with decent tools. Tony |
Baz | 02/07/2023 17:50:10 |
1033 forum posts 2 photos | Totally agree with Tony, a totally proven technique, if it doesn’t work you have a c*** tool. Hemmingway do a small broach kit and drawings, it works superbly well I have made a couple of them and had absolutely no problems broaching 5mm hexagon on a Myford lathe. |
JasonB | 02/07/2023 18:22:29 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | 19mm is going to need a fair bit more pressure than the small sizes the Hemmingway unit can go upto. and would not be something to try on say a minilathe and 7050 is quite a strong alloy |
ChrisLH | 02/07/2023 18:25:02 |
111 forum posts 7 photos | Mike Cox wrote an illuminating article on the subject in MEW 241, page 24 et sequ. A read may help. |
Bazyle | 02/07/2023 19:25:58 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | +1 Macolm's comment |
Daniel Brannan | 02/07/2023 20:30:09 |
42 forum posts 8 photos | Thanks - just done some reading as suggested and it sounds like it’s simply too big a size. The tool I have is quality, the holder perhaps less so but I can’t see any issue with it. I’ll have to have him make me a smaller broach so I can experiment with smaller ones. It’s a good point about 7050 as well - i just looked up the Brinell hardness and it’s harder than some steels |
Pete Rimmer | 02/07/2023 20:55:13 |
1486 forum posts 105 photos | How is the broach holder being held? In the tailstocks or in a toolpost? If it's in the tailstock then check the spindle to tailstock alignment. If it's offset a bit there might be enough bend in it all to cancel out the 1 degree axial offset. If it's in the toolpost check that you actually do have the offset angle and that it's not turned to cancel it out and present the broach face flat to the work as it won't cut like that. In either case you could try adding a little lateral offset and see if that helps. |
Pete Rimmer | 02/07/2023 21:01:19 |
1486 forum posts 105 photos | Posted by Daniel Brannan on 02/07/2023 15:04:11:
I never did understand the principle really as surely once the part is in contact with the broach, nothing is ‘wobbling’, all that is happening is one part of the broach is ahead of the others. Obviously it’s clever people than me that came up with this though 🙂 The principle is very simple. If you look at Malcolm's sketch you'll see that the bottom edge of the tool is inside the hole and the top edge is outside. This means that the point at the top will be more to the left when it's made half a turn to get to the bottom. The end of the broach is the cutting face and it plows the metal into the hole as it turns. All you have to do is push it. |
bernard towers | 02/07/2023 21:35:17 |
1221 forum posts 161 photos | As Peter says the principle is very simple but perhaps more easily understood as the action is akin to skiving with a wood chisel type action. |
Daniel Brannan | 03/07/2023 02:42:01 |
42 forum posts 8 photos | The tool holder is being held in the tailstock (i turned a Morse taper on it). I have checked alignment but I’ll recheck it tomorrow. Thanks again |
Daniel Brannan | 03/07/2023 02:45:41 |
42 forum posts 8 photos | Posted by Pete Rimmer on 02/07/2023 21:01:19:
Posted by Daniel Brannan on 02/07/2023 15:04:11:
I never did understand the principle really as surely once the part is in contact with the broach, nothing is ‘wobbling’, all that is happening is one part of the broach is ahead of the others. Obviously it’s clever people than me that came up with this though 🙂 The principle is very simple. If you look at Malcolm's sketch you'll see that the bottom edge of the tool is inside the hole and the top edge is outside. This means that the point at the top will be more to the left when it's made half a turn to get to the bottom. The end of the broach is the cutting face and it plows the metal into the hole as it turns. All you have to do is push it. I suppose the bit I can’t my head round is how the spinning helps in any way. Plus once you have progressed beyond the opening, surely all of the tool is in contact with the part, just with the leading edge further in |
Pete Rimmer | 03/07/2023 06:34:19 |
1486 forum posts 105 photos | Posted by Daniel Brannan on 03/07/2023 02:45:41:
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 02/07/2023 21:01:19:
Posted by Daniel Brannan on 02/07/2023 15:04:11:
I never did understand the principle really as surely once the part is in contact with the broach, nothing is ‘wobbling’, all that is happening is one part of the broach is ahead of the others. Obviously it’s clever people than me that came up with this though 🙂 The principle is very simple. If you look at Malcolm's sketch you'll see that the bottom edge of the tool is inside the hole and the top edge is outside. This means that the point at the top will be more to the left when it's made half a turn to get to the bottom. The end of the broach is the cutting face and it plows the metal into the hole as it turns. All you have to do is push it. I suppose the bit I can’t my head round is how the spinning helps in any way. Plus once you have progressed beyond the opening, surely all of the tool is in contact with the part, just with the leading edge further in That's correct, it's further in but still doing the same thing, shaving a small amount ahead of itself each rotation. If it's in the tailstock try moving the tailstock off-set a tiny bit. If you were looking at Malcolm's sketch above move the tailstoks off-set in the downwards direction. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.