Dell | 23/12/2021 17:41:34 |
![]() 230 forum posts 44 photos | Hi everyone |
Emgee | 23/12/2021 17:55:41 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Dell I think you need to work back from the centre height dimension of the lathe above the compound, take into account that for any tool size used the height adjustment of the tool is within range to be on centre height. Draw a sketch and look at the dimensions needed before getting the sub-plate material. Emgee |
JasonB | 23/12/2021 18:24:36 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | I would try to avoid packing altogether after all that is why QCTPs have height adjustment. My not Multifix holders take upto 1/2" tooling yet I only need to use packing if I fit 3mm toolbits and the packing goes under the toolbit as there is not enough adjustment to get the QCTP higher You may need to look at putting a packer under the whole tool post rather than in the individual holders but bear in mind things like boring bars which unless you are only doing small shallow hole swill tend to have shanks over 6mm. EDIT Just had a look and the Aa has 6mm of height adjustment. If you set the toolpost so that when the holders are at their lowest position you can get 10mm tools in then the adjustment will then bring the bottom of the holder upto 4mm. 12mm Boring bars will still be OK as the cutter is not at the top of the shank
Edited By JasonB on 23/12/2021 18:37:06 |
Dell | 23/12/2021 19:54:27 |
![]() 230 forum posts 44 photos | Thanks for the replies and advice,I only repair antique clocks that’s why I normally use the smaller tool bits but I want to start hopefully making my own tools when I can. Dell |
JasonB | 23/12/2021 20:18:10 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | In that case I would position it so when raised to top of adjustment the bottom edge of the tool holder is approx 3mm below ctr height which will allow for some material being ground off the tops of your 4mm toolbits and would happily allow 8mm tooling to still be used as the holder will drop to 9mm below ctr height. |
Dell | 23/12/2021 20:49:34 |
![]() 230 forum posts 44 photos | Posted by JasonB on 23/12/2021 20:18:10:
In that case I would position it so when raised to top of adjustment the bottom edge of the tool holder is approx 3mm below ctr height which will allow for some material being ground off the tops of your 4mm toolbits and would happily allow 8mm tooling to still be used as the holder will drop to 9mm below ctr height. Thanks JasonB That makes sense because there may be times that I need to use 8mm tooling although not very often but it’s good to have the option.. thanks and merry Xmas Dell |
Zan | 24/12/2021 12:35:31 |
356 forum posts 25 photos | Here is my set up with the apAa pew multifix. It’s an 8 mm tool bit sat on a 1.5 mm packing no particular reason for this, Plenty of adjustment above and below as can be seen. I generally use 8 & 10 mm. toolbits. I have found the toolpost system both incredibly rigid and accurate in repositioning tools. The base is a replacement for the topslide, and is perhaps a bit big, for the much smaller multifix set up, it was made for the previous toolpost. I rarely use the topslide now with a DRO, it gets in the way and introduces another possible lack of rigidity.. The project is making cooling fins on a v8 Whittle engine
Edited By Zan on 24/12/2021 12:36:25 |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.