Chris Denton | 13/06/2015 21:48:42 |
275 forum posts | I need to make a couple of parts on the lathe and wondering whether to use 303 or 304 stainless steel. The part needs to have a smooth finish so it can be polished well. It's a fair size lathe so I'm happy using 304.
Thanks. |
Andrew Johnston | 13/06/2015 22:02:05 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | In my experience freecutting 303 is a joy to use, and it requires real ability not to get a good finish. On the other hand I find 304 to be a real pig. Andrew |
Ajohnw | 13/06/2015 23:25:33 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | 303 is fine. You might find that as with all extruded materials that the skin is a bit dodgy but not much needs turning off to fix that. There are better grades. If you google StainlessSteelsforMachining_9011_.pdf you should find a run down of many different types by the Nickel Institute I just looked and it is still about. John - |
Bezzer | 13/06/2015 23:29:29 |
203 forum posts 16 photos | I'm with Andrew, prefer 303 every time for a decent finish and it polishes up to mirror easily.. |
Ian S C | 14/06/2015 11:14:34 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | I wanted 303 to carve out a hot cap for a Stirling Engine, The steel merchant only had 316 in the size I wanted, so when I said I'd take it, they gave me a discount of 50% with the words, your going to have a hell of a job with that stuff, hope this is a bit of compensation. Apart from streams of swafe, it machined to a good finish. Definately not free cutting. Ian S C |
Chris Denton | 14/06/2015 11:23:11 |
275 forum posts | Thanks. It's looking like 303. interesting link, I'll read it later! |
Andrew Johnston | 14/06/2015 11:35:21 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | I've never had a problem with 316 either, turns beautifully and seems happy with fine cuts. It's only 304 that seems to be a pig. Andrew |
Carl Wilson 4 | 14/06/2015 13:06:55 |
![]() 670 forum posts 53 photos | How strange. I've never had any trouble with either 304 or 316. I haven't ever used 303 so no idea. I always get a brilliant finish on either 304 or 316. Carl. |
Brian Wood | 14/06/2015 15:59:50 |
2742 forum posts 39 photos |
Brian |
Carl Wilson 4 | 15/06/2015 00:48:20 |
![]() 670 forum posts 53 photos | That is nice Brian. The British Stainless Steel Association give guidelines for machining all types. For the 300 series the main thing is a correct grade of carbide tip, deep enough cuts to prevent work hardening and plentiful lubricant.
Carl. |
Ajohnw | 15/06/2015 09:15:06 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | I wonder if this is a case of all will give a wonderful finish if emery cloth etc is used on it? I assumed a good straight turned finish is required. Just about anything can be polished up. John - Edited By John W1 on 15/06/2015 09:15:32 Edited By John W1 on 15/06/2015 09:16:15 |
John Stevenson | 15/06/2015 09:48:15 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | One note on these materials. 316 which is commonly referred to as food grade is available in many forms, round, flats, hex etc 303's most common form is rounds and hex, flats are very hard to source. 304 which is the original hardaswitchestits, is also available in many forms but in flat form this now tends to be in sheared plate as opposed to rolled. Probably to do with stock levels.
So if you want flats then please ask your supplier if it's rolled or sheared and if sheared then add 2mm onto the width to clean up if you want square edges. |
Andrew Johnston | 15/06/2015 09:52:33 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Here are some actual results, and measurements, for turning 303 stainless. Unusually for insert tooling a shallow depth of cut still gave an excellent finish.
Material: Stainless steel 1.25" diameter, grade 303 free machining:
Trial 1: 180rpm (59fpm), no coolant
Trial 2: 180rpm (59fpm), coolant
Trial 3: 800rpm (262fpm), coolant
Trial 4: 800rpm (262fpm), no coolant
General Appearance:
Trial 1: Surface is rough and torn, picks up fibres when wiped with a paper towel
Trial 2: Smooth finish and uniform
Trial 3: Smooth finish and uniform
Trial 4: Smooth finish, but slightly less uniform that 3
Under a magnifying glass:
Trial 1: Surface is dull, torn and uneven
Trial 2: Surface is smooth, little or no tearing
Trial 3: Surface is smooth, no tearing
Trial 4: Surface is smooth, no tearing, but slightly uneven axially
Swarf:
Trial 1: Long tight coils, several feet long
Trial 2: Short coils, about 1"
Trial 3: Short pieces, not coiled
Trial 4: Short pieces, not coiled, light yellow colour
Surface roughness (Ra µm):
Trial 1: 5.07 3.52 3.84 Average=4.14
Trial 2: 1.83 1.80 1.72 Average=1.78
Trial 3: 1.97 1.86 2.12 Average=1.98
Trial 4: 2.06 2.06 2.30 Average=2.14
Small depth of cut test 2 thou off diameter, 800rpm, 4 thou per rev, with coolant:
Difference before and after, 2.1 thou, excellent finish, as good as the best of four trials above.
Conclusion: Best is slow speed with coolant, although high speed with coolant isn't far behind. It is possible to take fine cuts and still retain a good finish.
Andrew |
Brian Wood | 15/06/2015 09:59:19 |
2742 forum posts 39 photos | John W1 This example was a case of hewing out the metal, in this case with a small carbide button tool, and then smoothing the shape with various files before using a worn Scotchbrite pad to finish the job. It was a satisfying piece of freehand turning as well.. I've had equally good results making taper turned furniture knobs in 304 which were then finished with Scotchbrite to leave a satin finish. Good support to the work is I think very important so that flexing is kept to a minimum. Work speed is modest at around 300-400 rpm Brian. |
Chris Denton | 15/06/2015 10:12:17 |
275 forum posts | I went with 303 in the end. I didn't realise it was a pain to find in odd numbered metric sizes though. Found some at mkmetals eventually! |
Ian S C | 15/06/2015 12:11:14 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | I'v kept clear of using emery cloth on stainless, the finish is usually good enough off the tool, 90% of the work is done with HSS tools. The hot caps I used to make from solid, first bore out the inside, then Loktite it on a steel mandrel and take the outside down to size. Now days, I use thin walled SS tube, with an end TIG welded in place, might have to go back to the old method, my tame TIGger has been having eye problems. |
Chris Denton | 15/06/2015 13:45:34 |
275 forum posts | I did have to make something last week and used a large A2 (304) stainless bolt. It wasn't too bad to cut, although I didn't try and get a mirror finish. I also threaded it (original threads were machined off) with one of those cheap packs of dies that you get in pound shops, no problems. Thread was very good! |
Chris Denton | 16/06/2015 20:52:50 |
275 forum posts | I had a hour spare today but unfortunately the stainless 303 hadn't arrived (only ordered it yesterday so not moaning) so I used some 6/4 titanium! It's not really a mirror finish but it's smooth and shiney! |
John Stevenson | 17/06/2015 01:03:10 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Did a long pump shaft yesterday in stainless, 50mm in diameter and a couple of foot long. It had worn quite badly where the seal track ran and so needed building up and turning back to size with a good finish for the seal.
Shaft after welding with 316 wire.
Completed shaft.
This was turned at 1200 rpm feed of 0.07mm per rev and no coolant. I did take a video of it but You Tube will not upload it although it plays on my computer. |
Ian S C | 17/06/2015 10:25:03 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | A bit that I missed, 316 is the choice for marine work, prop shafts etc, made lots of fittings for my Brother in law's 50' power cat. Ian S C |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.