Jelly | 13/09/2022 09:54:29 |
![]() 474 forum posts 103 photos | Posted by John Hinkley on 13/09/2022 07:52:02:
What size are the workpieces that you intend machining? Would you not be better off (both time-wise and financially) holding the work at 90° to the existing horizontal spindle? Or am I being too simplistic? John
It's pretty likely that I'll want to use the full envelope of the machine... There's plenty of parts where using it as you describe would actually be better than using a vertical head (although would require fabricating a really rigid angle plate for any vice held work) because it gives a 15" X & 11" Y envelope, at the expense of only 6.5" Z travel and reduced "daylight" between the part and the spindle. But equally there's work where the increased "daylight" of a vertical head (on the basis that I offset the head upward vertically, probably more than the original design so that the bottom of my normal collet chucks would end up level with the top of the horizontal spindle) would be more important, specifically I own quite a lot of insertable milling tooling which has comparatively long shanks, which I'd like to be able to use on this mill, but also don't want to go cutting down to make it fit. In any case my plan is to (as far as possible) use the approach you're suggesting to make the parts of the vertical head which require milling, as a bit of a challenge. |
Jelly | 13/09/2022 10:09:34 |
![]() 474 forum posts 103 photos | Posted by not done it yet on 13/09/2022 08:50:51:
Posted by Jelly on 12/09/2022 23:01:32:
Posted by not done it yet on 12/09/2022 19:34:18:
Which model do you have? Vertical by design or the horizontal which could have had a vertical head fitted? Horizontal, though with the higher speed range (63-1500RPM) In that case, you might be able to relatively easily fit a Centec vertical head? Likely with a motor above, but whatever happens to fit. It would only need a dovetail adaptor-plate/riser block to fit the head. There may be other, similar fitting, heads from other machines which could be used? While expensive, they are more available than a genuine Harrison head. That's another option, although at that point the price (at least from a search today) is such that it would probably be as well buying a second hand Bridgeport Head, and fabricating a mount for it which fits onto the overarm dovetails. Both approaches also result in using a lot more storage space (something which is at a bit of a premium for me), and being even heavier/more ungainly to lift into position (I have been rather more cautious about lifting after I gave myself Sciatica in my mid 20's by thinking I was some kind of superman, thankfully it was fully cured by a course of muscle relaxants and physiotherapy on that occasion, but if I was to allow a "next time" I may not be so lucky). |
not done it yet | 13/09/2022 10:28:05 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | Posted by Jelly on 13/09/2022 10:09:34:> … That's another option, although at that point the price (at least from a search today) is such that it would probably be as well buying a second hand Bridgeport Head, and fabricating a mount for it which fits onto the overarm dovetails. Both approaches also result in using a lot more storage space (something which is at a bit of a premium for me), and being even heavier/more ungainly to lift into position (I have been rather more cautious about lifting after I gave myself Sciatica in my mid 20's by thinking I was some kind of superman, thankfully it was fully cured by a course of muscle relaxants and physiotherapy on that occasion, but if I was to allow a "next time" I may not be so lucky). Fitment of a long riser block (as per quite a few Centecs - I have one on my 2B) could mean that the vertical head would not necessarily need to be dismounted for horizontal work. with my Centec I have to remove the drive belt, but not so if the drive comes from an extra motor You clearly have several options, and the 2B is my only experience with a combination vertical/horizontal. I am confident, from your posts, that you will find a good way forward. |
Jelly | 13/09/2022 10:48:11 |
![]() 474 forum posts 103 photos | Posted by not done it yet on 13/09/2022 10:28:05:
Posted by Jelly on 13/09/2022 10:09:34:> … That's another option, although at that point the price (at least from a search today) is such that it would probably be as well buying a second hand Bridgeport Head, and fabricating a mount for it which fits onto the overarm dovetails. Both approaches also result in using a lot more storage space (something which is at a bit of a premium for me), and being even heavier/more ungainly to lift into position (I have been rather more cautious about lifting after I gave myself Sciatica in my mid 20's by thinking I was some kind of superman, thankfully it was fully cured by a course of muscle relaxants and physiotherapy on that occasion, but if I was to allow a "next time" I may not be so lucky). Fitment of a long riser block (as per quite a few Centecs - I have one on my 2B) could mean that the vertical head would not necessarily need to be dismounted for horizontal work. with my Centec I have to remove the drive belt, but not so if the drive comes from an extra motor You clearly have several options, and the 2B is my only experience with a combination vertical/horizontal. I am confident, from your posts, that you will find a good way forward. I was struggling to picture how the riser block would allow me to use it in horizontal mode, but a quick search revealed this: (Future readers with the same problem I have, click the image to link to the original build thread for that design). Which makes everything make sense, seen as it's clearly intended to function as the overarm as well as raising the vertical head up... Very nifty indeed! |
Chris Evans 6 | 13/09/2022 12:13:23 |
![]() 2156 forum posts | Posted by Jelly on 12/09/2022 23:48:35:
Posted by Vic on 12/09/2022 16:49:57:
Posted by Baz on 12/09/2022 15:50:30:
Now that Huron is a proper mill, what a beautiful machine. I was thinking the same thing. Some folks lust after the old Bridgeports but I’d far sooner have something like that Huron. Whilst it benefits from amazing brand recognition, the Bridgeport isn't even the best Bridgeport Clone... TOS's FNK25(A) and Shizuoka's VHR(/G) both blow it out of the water on features, rigidity and performance whilst being cheaper new (and probably cheaper now due to not being "the" brand). .I have used Deckel and Schaublin mills and also worked a Huron for many a happy hour. All are good but I think the Huron is slightly better, Droop and Rhine (spelling ?) also figure high on my list. Retirement sees me with a Bridgeport turret mill and does all I will ever need. It's a long-term ambition of mine to own a Huron (and by extension have a workshop big enough for that to be sensible), they are far and away the best designed and most ergonomic to operate of all the ram-type "Euro-Mill" machines (including the Deckels and Schaublins) a lot of effort clearly went into making them easy to operate no matter what possible use case you had for one... It's just unfortunate that they only made them in a size range from "That's really quite a big mill isn't it?" to "Ah, so you'll be wanting to machine the column casting of a Bridgeport now will you?"
|
RobCox | 13/09/2022 14:22:47 |
82 forum posts 44 photos |
I have a vertical milling head that I acquired a while ago and adapted it to fit the horizontal drive of my Elliott 00 mill, in the mistaken belief that it might make setups a little easier when cutting helical gears, as the normal vertical head swings way over towards the edge of the table leaving precious little room for a dividing head. Here is that head: If it's of any use, I could be persuaded to part with it for a reasonable sum. It's 3MT in the spindle end, the drive I believe is a keyed 1inch parallel shaft: The two steel plates make up the adaptor to fit existing screw threads in the mill - two holes partially overlap hence the two plates. I made up this drive shaft using an INT30 endmill holder off ebay: I never got any further than stripping it down cleaning, greasing the bearings and getting it running on the mill. I have too many projects on the go to do anything else to it. Please PM me if its any use. Rob |
Martin Johnson 1 | 13/09/2022 15:50:07 |
320 forum posts 1 photos | At one time Hemingway did a kit for a Dore Westbury look alike head. Construction (and drawings) was written up in earlyish MEW. I am away from home so cant look up the issue numbers. Perhaps some other kind soul will. Martin |
bernard towers | 13/09/2022 16:57:38 |
1221 forum posts 161 photos | Yes that's issue 34/35/36, by Mark Figes |
Jelly | 13/09/2022 20:44:22 |
![]() 474 forum posts 103 photos | Rob and I have now struck a deal over his unloved attachment above, which will still require some adjustments to work effectively on the Harrison, but saves a great deal of work compared to making the unit from scratch. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.