Neil Wyatt | 18/11/2016 10:37:38 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | It's congruent triangles (remember those). As long as top and bottom are identical (but rotated 180 degrees) it should work. Changing lengths will just affect how far it can move. Neil |
David Jupp | 18/11/2016 10:46:38 |
978 forum posts 26 photos | For those wanting to study/measure/play with the SolidWorks model, there is a free viewer program available. Handy if you don't have a CAD system that can import the files. |
SillyOldDuffer | 18/11/2016 10:46:57 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 18/11/2016 10:37:38:
It's congruent triangles (remember those). ... Neil Do I remember congruent triangles? No. I've always been obtuse. Dave |
MW | 18/11/2016 10:48:36 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | I'm astounded by how much discussion this has caused beyond discovering it's namesake, size and tolerable load. Michael W |
Ady1 | 18/11/2016 10:50:39 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | I think he means the short arm appears to give support to the RHS. It is perfectly possible to add a similar parallelogram to the LHS. Now why didn't I think of that... doh |
Neil Wyatt | 18/11/2016 15:24:22 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Ady1 on 18/11/2016 10:50:39:
I think he means the short arm appears to give support to the RHS. It is perfectly possible to add a similar parallelogram to the LHS. Now why didn't I think of that... doh I don't think you can.... But the 'unsupported' LHS at the top is mirrored by the unsupported RHS at the bottom. Neil |
JasonB | 18/11/2016 15:51:03 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | The parallelogram that ADY drew is needed to ensure both sides rise at the same rate, without the two short links if the table was unevenly loaded there would be a tendancy for the screw to pull in more on the lighter loaded side and tilt the table as that side would expand more. I don't think the ration is massively important but it will affect the max and min heights.
J |
Michael Gilligan | 18/11/2016 16:13:43 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 18/11/2016 15:24:22:
But the 'unsupported' LHS at the top is mirrored by the unsupported RHS at the bottom. . Thank you, Neil ... that's exactly how I saw it. ... the shapes are 'equal and opposite'. MichaelG. |
JasonB | 18/11/2016 16:57:04 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Here for your Friday evening entertainment is a little video that shows that without the two short links the top can go all over the place, as soon as the links are added hey presto the top stays level. Can't be bothered with all that Lego or Mecano - stick it in the CAD.
Edited By JasonB on 18/11/2016 16:57:33 |
Cyril Bonnett | 18/11/2016 20:44:38 |
250 forum posts 1 photos | HI Dan You can download Solidworks eDrawing viewer.
Cyril
|
Dan Carter | 18/11/2016 20:47:24 |
81 forum posts 8 photos | Jason, From my lego messing about, the ratio appears to affect the way the thing moves - e.g. if you look at 43 seconds in your video, the top surface has moved to the left of the bottom surface, and the middle pivots are tilted downwards on the left. Sheer luck gave me a physical model where it moves more or less vertically, and the centre pivots stay horizontal, which allows a second parallelogram to be added without the thing locking. It is not perfect, and wouldn;t work without a tiny bit of flex, but it makes me wonder if there is a ratio which would allow this ? Dan |
JasonB | 18/11/2016 20:51:31 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Yes I found that and have been playing with the lengths. I started with 150mm long links and 50mm short which is what you see in the video but nearer 60mm short links seems better. Will play some more. |
Michael Gilligan | 18/11/2016 21:26:29 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Dan Carter on 18/11/2016 09:59:52:
... may have to actually read Michael G's link . Dan, I think now might be a good time to do that ^^^ ... It's really rather good. MichaelG. |
Neil Wyatt | 18/11/2016 22:36:35 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | It seems to have more than a little in common with Watt's parallel motion. |
Michael Gilligan | 18/11/2016 23:44:46 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | More bedtime reading, for those intrigued by this subject: **LINK** http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/gutenberg.org/2/7/1/0/27106/27106-h/27106-h.htm MichaelG.
|
Andy Ash | 18/12/2016 01:37:40 |
159 forum posts 36 photos | http://www.zen180103.zen.co.uk/Scissor.avi Above is a short clip of an experiment I did to figure out a new free tool I got. It's been a while since the last post on this thread, but at the time, I had no time. This mechanism stays parallel at the top and the bottom because of its symmetry. The thing is that the screw-link does not necessarily stay level unless you position the links carefully. This may not matter if you don't mind the hand-wheel going wonky. Anyhow I finally had time to sit down with this new software tool I got and give it a go. You will see that I had to anchor the screw and have the top and bottom fly freely. This is actually a limitation of the simulator, but it does not prevent a clear understanding of accurate and optimal link sizes. The tool is straightforwardly called "Linkage". Its good for locomotive valve gears too. Although its still not perfect from a user interface perspective, it still seems like quite a leap forward from some of the valve gear simulators I have seen. It's free and you can find it; http://blog.rectorsquid.com/linkage-mechanism-designer-and-simulator/
Edited By Andy Ash on 18/12/2016 01:48:39 |
Dan Carter | 19/12/2016 21:04:32 |
81 forum posts 8 photos | Andy, That is a really useful thing - thanks very much for the link. Would you mind posting your linkage file somewhere so I can have a look at your model ? Regards, Dan |
Andy Ash | 20/12/2016 00:31:06 |
159 forum posts 36 photos | You can find the file at the link below. Sadly I have been unable to make it so that the file will download, rather than open directly in the browser. In any case, if you are careful the file is actually just plain text. You can copy the whole text from the browser, paste it into notepad and save it to a file of your choosing. The extension should probably be specific however. If you decide to call it "Scissors", then the filename should be "Scissors.linkage2". (Obviously without the quotes). Notepad will try to call it "Scissors.linkage2.txt", if it does this just rename the file, with a normal file explorer window. The actual linkage has not been defined accurately. I just wiggled the links until it looked O.K. I'm sure you can be more scientific. The positions of all the links can be controlled by co-ordinate, and the whole thing scaled metric or imperial. You can't import a drawing from a CAD system easily, but you can export your link pivot positions directly to DXF or DWG so you can get accurate positions directly into 2D cad if that's what you need. Have fun! Edited By Andy Ash on 20/12/2016 00:42:38 |
John McNamara | 20/12/2016 08:06:37 |
![]() 1377 forum posts 133 photos | The parallelogram section reduces the travel of the screw compared to the distance travelled by the lift at the expense of leverage hence the large hand wheel. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.