John Hinkley | 19/09/2016 20:28:21 |
![]() 1545 forum posts 484 photos | I don't pretend to understand a blind word of any of this, but is there something different with ER11 closing nuts compared with the larger sizes? The two pictures in Neil Lickfold's post seem to show the collet not seated properly in the nut. I have ER25 and ER32 collet systems for the lathe and mill and all my collets are flush with the nut front face when fitted. John |
Michael Gilligan | 21/09/2016 12:04:19 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Mark C on 19/09/2016 10:33:07:
I will attach an image of the whole thing in a moment < etc > . Reference ^^^ It seems to have gone rather quiet Has Mark frightened everyone off ? or is this the calm before the storm ? MichaelG.
Edited By Michael Gilligan on 21/09/2016 12:04:32 |
Raymond Anderson | 21/09/2016 13:45:48 |
![]() 785 forum posts 152 photos | |
Raymond Anderson | 21/09/2016 13:51:48 |
![]() 785 forum posts 152 photos | Above is the e-mail received earlier. I think it is the same chap who sent me the er details for a previous thread on the er's. I have enjoyed the [sometimes heated ] confab on the subject. I and I think a few others have found it interesting. and thanks to Mark for doing the FEA. I will reiterate once more that as a toolholding system for our [hobbyist ] needs it can't be beat. I wouldn't say otherwise. cheers
|
Nick Hulme | 22/09/2016 00:00:46 |
750 forum posts 37 photos | Proof of intent is not proof of function or fact, in Law or in Engineering, Engineers know this ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sirs, Can you confirm that the key features and many systems utilised in the Saturn 5 Rocket were initially and primarily designed for the Terrestrial delivery of weapons systems? Thanks, Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sirs, Can you confirm that your track based, steam powered mass transit system is designed for a maximum speed of 15mph because greater speeds will prove fatal to the human body? Thanks, Nick ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Most innovative systems have evolved from something designed for an alternate purpose or to operate under other parameters, to suggest that proof of design intention is proof of limits of functional capability is instead proof of massive misunderstanding and complete failure of engineering conceptualisation on the part of the author, - Nick Edited By Nick Hulme on 22/09/2016 00:27:33 |
Raymond Anderson | 22/09/2016 04:49:46 |
![]() 785 forum posts 152 photos | Point 1 I said they were designed for drilling and reaming , outcome correct. Point 2 That they are weakest at heavy radial forces ie heavy milling Outcome, correct. Point 3 that there are better workholding systems ,Outcome correct. You would have us believe that you know more about this than the originators. Ive got news for you " big fail " Do like the attempted side step though. You executed that move like a " natural " Still haxent seen any of this extensive machinibg experience that you have ??? |
david williams 14 | 22/09/2016 07:36:48 |
16 forum posts | recognise the limitations and work within them |
Michael Smith 15 | 22/09/2016 08:08:31 |
28 forum posts | A friend of mine has several 5 axis Huron machines making parts for the areospace industry to limits that most people could only dream about . They use ER collets for everthing and recon there is nothing to beat them . Good enough for , good enough for me |
Raymond Anderson | 22/09/2016 09:30:53 |
![]() 785 forum posts 152 photos | At the start of this thread a member simply stated that the er system was not designed for work holding only for toolholding, he was met with the reply "utter tosh" . I replied that he was correct. I also stated that they were originally designed for holding Drills / Reamers. again proved correct . I also stated that they were not the best toolholders, I never specified in which scenario that was in. I will concede that I should have specified in an industrial setting. they lack the clamping power for High feed milling. and in our "environment and many industrial scenarios, they are great. I have proven what I stated in all 3 areas. ie their original design intent , Torque / Rigidity at HPC, and the workholding scenario. As far as I am concerned the case is closed. I have no interest or need to argue this "Ad Infinitum". |
John Stevenson | 22/09/2016 09:38:19 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Meanwhile the people that can do, do And the people who can't, waffle on. |
Michael Gilligan | 22/09/2016 09:57:29 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Raymond Anderson on 22/09/2016 09:30:53:
At the start of this thread a member simply stated that the er system was not designed for work holding only for toolholding, he was met with the reply "utter tosh" . I replied that he was correct. ... I have no interest or need to argue this "Ad Infinitum". . Well said, Raymond The system 'works' for work-holding, to the extent required by many; and the cheap stuff is very cheap .. So it's a 'no-brainer' that it will be adopted [and, using the word literally; abused] by this community. There is therefore no argument to be had. What interests me however, is the matter of understanding what goes on inside; so that, on the rare occasions when it matters, we can say "ah, I know why it's doing that ... perhaps I should use this instead" To that end; the questions to manufacturers; the practical tests; and the Finite Element Analysis, are very welcome,. MichaelG. |
John Stevenson | 22/09/2016 10:11:45 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Meanwhile the people that can do, do |
SillyOldDuffer | 22/09/2016 10:39:25 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by John Stevenson on 22/09/2016 10:11:45:
Meanwhile the people that can do, do But don't forget the poor beginner trying to learn their trade. If no-one explained I'd be left in the dark. To that end I'm prepared to forgive a certain amount of willy-waving. I'm off to the workshop for some 'doing' now, I promise! Cheers, Dave |
Michael Gilligan | 22/09/2016 10:42:29 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | John, Is this ^^^ really necessary ? You and I have different 'interests' and different motivations ... But surely there is room for both. I have great respect for what you do, and for the 'bodges' that you share with us ... But I also happen to have an enquiring mind. Could you perhaps manage a little respect [or at least patience] for those of us who are interested in the 'hows and whys' ? MichaelG. . Edit: Dave posted before me ... My comment refers to John Stevenson's post. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 22/09/2016 10:44:49 |
Raymond Anderson | 22/09/2016 10:59:28 |
![]() 785 forum posts 152 photos | Thank you Michael and Dave, If people never tried to understand what causes this or that, then nothing would progress. It is about understanding cause and effect [ or at least trying to ] Marks fine work with the FEA has shown what happens, even though I could'nt even pretend to understand the figures But I certainly understood the graphics. This has proved very interesting for me and I hope you and a few others also. At the end of the day if certain folks have no interest in the topic then fine, they can ignore it but, there are folks who ARE interested in it.. cheers. |
Martin Kyte | 22/09/2016 11:08:38 |
![]() 3445 forum posts 62 photos | Perhaps the "practical" results from all of this is when using ER collets for workholding make some attempt at using the things close to their original design mode. That being, when practicable, grip diameters close to the nominal size of the collet and ensure that the part is neither tapered to any great extent or off round and that the full length of the collet is filled. Many other collet systems really should be used with ground stock but they probably hardly ever are in our workshops. regards Martin |
Farmboy | 22/09/2016 11:26:37 |
171 forum posts 2 photos | Well, I've read the whole 10 pages of this thread and I'm still not sure how the Bank of Scotland figures in all this
but I'm looking forward to the comparative tests of all the other collet systems available . . . |
alan frost | 22/09/2016 13:16:37 |
137 forum posts 3 photos | Oh dear,after a couple or so years of grown up discussion I felt encouraged to use the site occasionally but I see that handbags have again been procured. What do you mean we don't have to read it.? Who could resist it ? Now can we get down to something useful ? What is recommended as giving the firmest grip on a handbag strap? Oh, a useful addition. I intend to use the bag ,speaking technically as a tool.
Edited By alan frost on 22/09/2016 13:19:55 Edited By alan frost on 22/09/2016 13:23:35 |
alan frost | 22/09/2016 13:34:27 |
137 forum posts 3 photos | But only in self defence,officer |
david williams 14 | 22/09/2016 16:02:44 |
16 forum posts | found to be excellent in both holding tooling and work. use er25 and er16. |
This thread is closed.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.