Are there any CAM users here ?
Michael Gilligan | 16/11/2021 18:08:37 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | I am on the verge of purchasing a licence for QCAD ... which seems a very useable 2D package [despite the irritation of it not supporting the use of a digitising tablet] But I am struggling to decide about the CAM module : **LINK** There seems to be very little information about it on t'internet. Can anyone advise, please ? MichaelG. |
Emgee | 16/11/2021 18:54:22 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Michael I notice you are able to download a copy of the CAM program FOC, do this and you can compare easily what's available within the program and see if it would suit your use. Emgee |
Michael Gilligan | 16/11/2021 19:25:38 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Emgee I have the 'trial' download ... but, since I am still considering my possible use, I am seeking guidance from those more familiar with such things. MichaelG. |
Emgee | 16/11/2021 21:51:15 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Did you view the Demo video ? if not that may answer some questions. Emgee |
Michael Gilligan | 16/11/2021 22:21:33 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Emgee on 16/11/2021 21:51:15:
Did you view the Demo video ? if not that may answer some questions. Emgee . Yes, I viewed the demo video ... and No it doesn't answer my question. What I want to know is how good, and how versatile, this module actually is. I currently have a small grbl laser engraver, but will hopefully be venturing into other [as yet unspecified] aspects of CNC. Whilst I am grateful for you taking the trouble to respond: What I want is some advice from someone who has the practical experience that I lack. MichaelG. |
Michael Gilligan | 17/11/2021 08:04:45 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | As Donald Rumsfeld famously put it : … there are also unknown-unknowns … MichaelG. . Ref. __ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_known_knowns Edited By Michael Gilligan on 17/11/2021 08:05:28 |
blowlamp | 17/11/2021 11:47:54 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos | It seems you may struggle to find many users of the QCAM module - it's not something I have come across in my CAD/CAM travels, I must admit. If you just want a well sorted & reliable CAM system for milling & laser at a reasonable price point, then I suggest you download the CamBam trial software. It will accept DXF files from QCAD, as well as STL & STEP for any 3D work you may want to do in the future. CamBam has an excellent support forum which will put you back on track as and when you need it. There are also people on here that can help too - me included.
Martin. |
JasonB | 17/11/2021 12:49:55 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | The one big advantage of having the CAD and CAM in the same program is that if part way through the CAM you find you need to alter the part it should be possible to do that and the CAM file automatically update. If you are exporting/importing from one program to another then you basically have to start again with the newly imported revised part. |
blowlamp | 17/11/2021 13:15:55 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos | Posted by JasonB on 17/11/2021 12:49:55:
The one big advantage of having the CAD and CAM in the same program is that if part way through the CAM you find you need to alter the part it should be possible to do that and the CAM file automatically update. If you are exporting/importing from one program to another then you basically have to start again with the newly imported revised part.
CamBam has some very usable CAD facilities built into it that allows editing of imported files and in fact quite a few users draw their projects from scratch within it.
Martin. |
John Baron | 17/11/2021 15:32:00 |
![]() 520 forum posts 194 photos | Posted by blowlamp on 17/11/2021 11:47:54:
It seems you may struggle to find many users of the QCAM module - it's not something I have come across in my CAD/CAM travels, I must admit. If you just want a well sorted & reliable CAM system for milling & laser at a reasonable price point, then I suggest you download the CamBam trial software. It will accept DXF files from QCAD, as well as STL & STEP for any 3D work you may want to do in the future. CamBam has an excellent support forum which will put you back on track as and when you need it. There are also people on here that can help too - me included.
Martin. A major problem for me is that there is no Linux version of CamBam ! Where as Qcad with the Cam module does support Linux. Having said that I do use Qcad regularly, and I have played with the Cam part but don't actually use it in anger, not having any CNC machines.
|
blowlamp | 17/11/2021 16:01:24 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos | Posted by John Baron on 17/11/2021 15:32:00:
Posted by blowlamp on 17/11/2021 11:47:54:
It seems you may struggle to find many users of the QCAM module - it's not something I have come across in my CAD/CAM travels, I must admit. If you just want a well sorted & reliable CAM system for milling & laser at a reasonable price point, then I suggest you download the CamBam trial software. It will accept DXF files from QCAD, as well as STL & STEP for any 3D work you may want to do in the future. CamBam has an excellent support forum which will put you back on track as and when you need it. There are also people on here that can help too - me included.
Martin. A major problem for me is that there is no Linux version of CamBam ! Where as Qcad with the Cam module does support Linux. Having said that I do use Qcad regularly, and I have played with the Cam part but don't actually use it in anger, not having any CNC machines.
|
Another JohnS | 17/11/2021 17:23:38 |
842 forum posts 56 photos | Michael - maybe off topic, maybe not?? You decide. I'm a CamBam Linux user, and a QCAD linux user. Paid the "subscription" for both of them. I actually do 99% of my CAD on my Linux machine, my Windows partition containing Alibre Atom 3D and Meshcam gets turned on maybe every 6 months or so. I just like Linux, and do share my monitor with an Apple Mac Mini, and poor old Windows comes last. I did download CAMBAM on Windows, so I do know it starts up, but have not actually used it. (nor Meshcam!) I build to plans; I enjoy making parts; the 3D designing part of my brain gets used for other things other than Model Engineering, so likely my thoughts are different than the norm. I do watch what Jason does; fantastic work. My current project is finishing up two Southworth 3" pumps; I just QCAD up the parts, CAMBAM them, and transfer the gcode files to my CNC machines in my workshop. I'm building 2 of them, and parts are interchangeable, as one would expect. After that, back on my Martin-Evans "Ivatt", when that's complete, we'll see. Saying the above, my thoughts are to use Windows 10 more often, but it seems to be always updating when I turn it on, so there goes my evening. My CNC machines all run Linux, we have a couple of Macs and Macbooks and iPads/iPhones, so Windows is definitely the odd thing in our abode. I did write a few articles in Model Engineer showing what I did with QCAD and CAMBAM when building my Kozo Shay locomotive, if that is of any interest to you. John. |
Michael Gilligan | 17/11/2021 18:17:40 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | A somewhat delayed ‘thank you’ for the input, Gentlemen [ we were out for the afternoon ] Martin hit the nail on he head when he wrote: “It seems you may struggle to find many users of the QCAM module” … and the truth of that observation is, of course, is what prompted me to start this thread. As Jason then observed, however … there are perceived advantages to having CAD and CAM integrated into a package from a single supplier. I guess my question is really : Does QCAD/CAM have any significant issues which would make it worth the effort of using two discrete packages instead ? Since there appears to be little take-up of QCAD/CAM, that question ^^^ may in fact be unanswerable … I certainly don’t have the background knowledge to make an ‘informed decision’ at the moment. It does seem clear that there is wide enthusiasm for CamBam … so I will surely need to investigate that. . One thing I should mention is that I expect to use ‘whatever’ on my old MacBook Pro, which runs El Capitan: RibbonSoft seems to be particularly ‘friendly’ regarding legacy machines, and QCAD/CAM is available in versions to suit most of the Mac operating systems. You will see that I am stumbling around in the dark here … So, whilst I have a look at CamBam, I would be very grateful for any further input. MichaelG.
|
Michael Gilligan | 17/11/2021 18:25:36 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | UPDATE : Oh well … that didn’t take long: System RequirementsCamBam V1.0 requires the Microsoft .NET framework version 4. CamBam has been tested on Windows versions from XP up to Windows 10. . MichaelG. |
blowlamp | 17/11/2021 18:49:24 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos | Which operating system do you intend to use?
Martin. |
Michael Gilligan | 17/11/2021 19:05:35 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 17/11/2021 18:17:40: […] One thing I should mention is that I expect to use ‘whatever’ on my old MacBook Pro, which runs El Capitan: […] . Martin, Please see above ^^^ The [2009 vintage] MBP currently runs El Capitan, and I intend to continue using that. MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 17/11/2021 19:06:48 |
John Baron | 17/11/2021 19:38:24 |
![]() 520 forum posts 194 photos | Posted by blowlamp on 17/11/2021 16:01:24:
Posted by John Baron on 17/11/2021 15:32:00:
Posted by blowlamp on 17/11/2021 11:47:54:
It seems you may struggle to find many users of the QCAM module - it's not something I have come across in my CAD/CAM travels, I must admit. If you just want a well sorted & reliable CAM system for milling & laser at a reasonable price point, then I suggest you download the CamBam trial software. It will accept DXF files from QCAD, as well as STL & STEP for any 3D work you may want to do in the future. CamBam has an excellent support forum which will put you back on track as and when you need it. There are also people on here that can help too - me included.
Martin. A major problem for me is that there is no Linux version of CamBam ! Where as Qcad with the Cam module does support Linux. Having said that I do use Qcad regularly, and I have played with the Cam part but don't actually use it in anger, not having any CNC machines.
Hi Blowlamp, Thankyou for that link ! I'll have a play with that.
|
blowlamp | 17/11/2021 20:30:26 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 17/11/2021 19:05:35:
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 17/11/2021 18:17:40: […] One thing I should mention is that I expect to use ‘whatever’ on my old MacBook Pro, which runs El Capitan: […] . Martin, Please see above ^^^ The [2009 vintage] MBP currently runs El Capitan, and I intend to continue using that. MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 17/11/2021 19:06:48
That's a bit of a limitation, Michael.
The QCAM module appears to be limited to profile cuts, which can have a wide range of facilities within them, but I doubt would be enough once you become a capable CNC'er.
At the moment, the only Apple compatible CAM I can think of with a reasonable price/performance ratio would be Deskproto. Although it is primarily designed as a 3D system (Geometry Machining) , it also has enough 2D facilities (Vector Machining) to do useful work.
In essence, if you could find a Windows machine that you'd be happy using, then your choice would expand greatly.
Martin. |
Michael Gilligan | 17/11/2021 20:50:26 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | I guess that’s ‘case-closed’ then. MichaelG. |
Andy Carlson | 17/11/2021 22:24:16 |
440 forum posts 132 photos | I can't answer your question Michael as I use just QCAD myself but I am interested in the discussion. FWIW I use dxf2gcode to do G Code generation. It is fairly basic but helped by some careful layer naming (tool diameter etc) it has got me up and running. It's OK for profiling and has recently had pocket milling added but probably falls a long way short of some other CAM options. All of my stuff is on Windoze but the web page says it works on Linux and Mac too. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.