Help
Robonthemoor | 04/02/2014 22:03:28 |
![]() 211 forum posts 45 photos |
|
John Stevenson | 04/02/2014 22:20:28 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Think you have measured it wrong. It is a D series camlock and if the book says D1-4 probably is but a D1-4 if 63.5mm at the largest part of the taper. No D series is 44 odd mm |
Robonthemoor | 04/02/2014 22:35:54 |
![]() 211 forum posts 45 photos | Yes point taken, but the Manuel gives 2 figgers A2.4" as well, so could ether be fitted? what is A2.4" ? And it states 1.5/8" I measured it with a bore gauge. Rob |
John Stevenson | 04/02/2014 22:47:55 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Read the bottom of this page. You measure across the tapered register, not the bore. The bore size has nothing to do with the chuck.
An A series chuck is a bolt on table just above the bottom link I have given.
|
Alan .204 | 04/02/2014 23:12:56 |
304 forum posts 14 photos | Don't understand what you mean John, Rob's measurements are the inside of the spindle, have spoken to him and he measured it three times so that should be ok, what to MT tapers go up to.
Al. |
Alan .204 | 04/02/2014 23:12:56 |
304 forum posts 14 photos | Don't understand what you mean John, Rob's measurements are the inside of the spindle, have spoken to him and he measured it three times so that should be ok, what to MT tapers go up to.
Al. |
Rick Kirkland 1 | 04/02/2014 23:18:46 |
![]() 175 forum posts | Rob if its a D1-4 spindle nose it's 100 to 1 that you need a number 5 morse taper sleeve to reduce down to a 2 or 3 MTcentre Rick |
Alan .204 | 04/02/2014 23:22:50 |
304 forum posts 14 photos | Hi Rick wouldn't an MT5 have more of a taper than 1mm.
Al. |
John Stevenson | 04/02/2014 23:32:19 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | My bad, though he was asking about the chuck fitting not the spindle bore taper. Re read the post and I now see what he wants so ignore everything I have said, most people do anyway
The size given at the end of the spindle matches up with a No 5 Morse but the inside measurement doesn't. |
Alan .204 | 04/02/2014 23:35:06 |
304 forum posts 14 photos | Thats what I thought John so any idea what it could be with such a small taper,
Al. |
Martin W | 04/02/2014 23:41:15 |
940 forum posts 30 photos | Hi MT5 taper is 44.399mm at gauge line with a taper of 1:19.002 as given here. Cheers Martin |
Keith Long | 04/02/2014 23:46:36 |
883 forum posts 11 photos | Don't you need to know the axial separation between the 2 diameters as well? You could have a stub version of a standard taper. Keith |
Rick Kirkland 1 | 04/02/2014 23:51:19 |
![]() 175 forum posts | These taper bores are generally machined with a relief inbetween the taper at the front of the spindle and the remainder of the taper further into the spindle, completely unlike the taper in the tailstock barrel which is a continuously machined taper from front to back. Rick |
Robonthemoor | 05/02/2014 00:10:08 |
![]() 211 forum posts 45 photos | Sound like it's an MT5 rob |
Muzzer | 05/02/2014 06:08:06 |
![]() 2904 forum posts 448 photos | Yes, sounds like it. Note that for D1-4, the diameter of the (external) conical taper is 63.5mm. If it measures 54mm, it's a D1-3. The Bantam also has an MT5, so clearly it's used on machines with both D1-3 and D1-4 and different spindle bores. The critical dimensions for the MT bores are presumably the major diameter and the taper angle. Whether or not the bore extends the "full length" matters less. Murray |
Alan .204 | 05/02/2014 08:49:00 |
304 forum posts 14 photos | I have an MT 5 dead center Rob you had better try it before you buy one , just to make sure.
Al. |
Robonthemoor | 05/02/2014 09:27:42 |
![]() 211 forum posts 45 photos | Hi Murray" it's 44.25 not 54. D1-3 . it will be a chuck size D1-4 = 63.5 mm buts that's the OD of the spindle. I'm ID. thank for your input. Rob |
Robonthemoor | 05/02/2014 09:30:30 |
![]() 211 forum posts 45 photos | Keith you could be onto something"" stub version, tel me more. rob |
Gary Wooding | 05/02/2014 10:01:36 |
1074 forum posts 290 photos | If you really want to align the tailstock to the spindle, why not put centres in each and match the points? Or am I missing something here? Gary |
John Stevenson | 05/02/2014 10:11:14 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Gary, yes you are missing something. He's trying to sort out what centre he needs for the headstock. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.