Russell Eberhardt | 09/02/2012 13:53:32 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Can anyone explain why the depth of feed for modules 0 to 1.5 is given as 2.95 x M except for the range 0.5 to 1.0 where it is given as 3.38 x M? This doesn't seem logical to me. I could understand a smaller module being different to a larger one but changing back again seems strange Or is there a misprint in the tables? Russell. |
Stub Mandrel | 09/02/2012 21:34:54 |
![]() 4318 forum posts 291 photos 1 articles | My ageing Machinery's Handbook gives the total depth (i.e. cutter feed) as 2.157xmoduls or 2.167xmodule depending on whether clearance is 0.157xmodule or module/6 (the former being the American standard). Whatever the source both of your figures seem way to high as the addendum =module and dedendum =module+clearance i.e. feed depth is module x 2 + clearance. What is your source for these figures? Neil |
Russell Eberhardt | 10/02/2012 11:04:19 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by Stub Mandrel on 09/02/2012 21:34:54: My ageing Machinery's Handbook gives the total depth (i.e. cutter feed) as 2.157xmoduls or 2.167xmodule depending on whether clearance is 0.157xmodule or module/6 (the former being the American standard). Whatever the source both of your figures seem way to high as the addendum =module and dedendum =module+clearance i.e. feed depth is module x 2 + clearance. What is your source for these figures? Neil I think your figures are for involute gears as opposed to the cycloidal gears used in clocks. The figures come from here: clock-works and the Meadows and Passemore catalogue. Russell. |
Niloch | 10/02/2012 12:16:12 |
371 forum posts | Does this post help at all? |
Russell Eberhardt | 10/02/2012 19:06:39 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Not really. I cn cut the wheels OK. I was just looking for a technical explanation of the tables. Russell. |
Stub Mandrel | 10/02/2012 21:45:26 |
![]() 4318 forum posts 291 photos 1 articles | Ah, I see. Ivan Law agrees with Machinerys, and as dfar as I can recall for cycloidal gears he says 'the depth is stamped on the cutter' or something like that. Is it possible that one depth is for gear to gear drives and the other for gear to lantern pinion? Neil |
Russell Eberhardt | 11/02/2012 21:02:46 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Found this useful site: Designing Cycloidal Gears . It gives all the equations based on the recommendations in BS 978. The BS calls for a bottom clearance of 0.4M and thus the ratio of tooth height (cutting depth) to modulus will be constant. Working through the equations I get: Depth = 3.06 x M This is close enough to the factor of 2.95 given for the smaller and larger sizes. I can only assume that the cutters sold for M 0.5 to M 1 have a non standard form, perhaps to give greater bottom clearance for some reason. I can't see why though. Russell; |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.