Rob Gough | 06/09/2022 17:32:42 |
2 forum posts | Hi, |
Michael Gilligan | 07/09/2022 07:58:30 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Not really answering your question, Rob … but you might want to make note of this: **LINK** https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Bloctube_Controls MichaelG. . Edit: __ also, if you are not already aware: https://tengamachinetools.com/ Edited By Michael Gilligan on 07/09/2022 08:03:52 |
Phil P | 07/09/2022 08:40:21 |
851 forum posts 206 photos | Again.......Not answering your question but I believe my Boley & Leinen jig borer was made pre-war and was the one that ended up being BCA after a few other variants such as Sigma Jones during and after WW2. |
Clive Foster | 07/09/2022 09:36:00 |
3630 forum posts 128 photos | I think the short answer to this confusion is multiple source suppliers with contracts being let to various firms to make the same thing under arrangements more akin to shadow factories than simple contracts used for more mundane items. The design authority was the Machine Tool Control Rationalisation Board who issued production licences for the standard design to various suppliers. Presumably factory branding was permitted so that, if there were problems, the offending supplier could be identified and to to sort out the issue. I imagine the factories would have embedded ministry inspectors, whether full or part time, to ensure things were kept up to scratch just as the aircraft production folk did. In the absence of any hard data as to when licences were issued and production actually started its quite creditable that machines from one, or more, suppliers could have been produced in 1939. Does anyone know when the Machine Tool Control Rationalisation Board was set up? Around 1935 would be my guess as that when the shadow factory ideas were first implemented. Clive |
Dave Halford | 07/09/2022 10:08:23 |
2536 forum posts 24 photos | Posted by Rob Gough on 06/09/2022 17:32:42:
Hi, Hi Rob, This was simply badge engineering with machines spread over several named makers mostly owned by one parent as mentioned below. So there is very unlikely to be a definite progression of companies. The the same manner the Austin 1100 was also made at the same time as the Wolsley 1100 and Riley 1100.
However, even this is not certain, for it was also stated in contemporary Elliott catalogues that their machines were made: "… at the works of our subsidiary and associated companies whose whole output of machine tools and equipment is solely controlled by us." The clue lies in the word associated, for Elliot had enough buying power to commission, and then re-brand, machines from a several independent UK makers. |
Michael Gilligan | 07/09/2022 10:28:46 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | I have no evidence that it exists, but … it would be nice to think that lurking somewhere in the depths of the MoD there is a document pre-dating, but similar in style to this one about Leitz : **LINK** https://www.angelfire.com/biz/Leica/page26.html MichaelG. |
Rob Gough | 07/09/2022 13:26:17 |
2 forum posts | Thanks for all the input. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.