Former Member | 09/02/2022 11:46:19 |
1085 forum posts | [This posting has been removed] |
Thor 🇳🇴 | 09/02/2022 12:51:21 |
![]() 1766 forum posts 46 photos | Hi Bill, I don't think your guess would be far off. I'm working on a steam engine with 19mm stroke and bore, and use a piston that is 8mm wide/thick. Thor Edited By Thor 🇳🇴 on 09/02/2022 12:54:31 |
Redsetter | 09/02/2022 13:05:10 |
239 forum posts 1 photos | I take it this is the incomplete engine in your other post? If both cylinders are to be the same bore, it is not really a compound. For 1/2 inch bore the piston length could perhaps be anything from 1/4 to 1/2 or a bit longer, depending on how you intend to seal it - for a low working pressure you could make it long, and just put some oil grooves in. Clearances are not going to be critical on something like that - aim for 1/32 each end, but 1/16 will not hurt. Since you have the original valve gear, I would work out the valve travel and port face dimensions alongside designing the cylinder, and this should give you a few clues to the original proportions. Mill engines usually had quite long cylinders, and bear in mind the rear cover needs to be fairly long to accommodate the gland. It looks quite lightly built, so do not try and extract too much power from it! Just my opinion. |
JasonB | 09/02/2022 13:06:26 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | 3/8 piston sounds a bit thick on a 1/2" bore, 3/16 or 1/4 more usual say 1/4" as that will then suite the LP bore of the compound 1/32" void at each end and a 1/32" spigot to the cylinder covers so 1" & 1/4" + (4* 1/32" ) total 1 3/8 Edited By JasonB on 09/02/2022 13:07:50 |
Former Member | 09/02/2022 13:11:30 |
1085 forum posts | [This posting has been removed] |
Former Member | 09/02/2022 13:12:27 |
1085 forum posts | [This posting has been removed] |
JasonB | 09/02/2022 13:17:43 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Here is the Bassett Lowke replica I did last year 12mm bore 0.75mm voids, 0.75mm cover spigots, 6mm piston thickness with 2 oil grooves only thing different is the stroke was shorter as it's a high speed engine
It's possible that the spigots you have may not have been to the cylinder bore, it was quite common to have a cylinder cover and then the flange of the engine frame so your spigot could have gone into a female hole in the rear cover which would have had a male spigot on the other side sized to suit the cylinder. |
Former Member | 09/02/2022 13:22:23 |
1085 forum posts | [This posting has been removed] |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.