Paul Lousick | 24/12/2019 20:46:46 |
2276 forum posts 801 photos | The valve eccentrics on my Ruston Proctor SD traction engine are set at 32 degrees (as shown on the supplied drawings) and the engine is running OK but I would be interested in knowing what angle other engines are using. Paul |
JasonB | 24/12/2019 20:51:52 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | The Fowler A7 has them at 38.2deg |
John Olsen | 25/12/2019 04:23:21 |
1294 forum posts 108 photos 1 articles | The ideal lead on the eccentrics will depend on the lap of the associated valve. If you are sufficiently curious, you could measure all the relevant parts and do a diagram or better yet, use the Dockstater software to see what the events are like. John |
Nigel Graham 2 | 19/02/2020 00:33:59 |
3293 forum posts 112 photos | The angle of advance is set by the designed lead (usually a tiny bit > 0 " In fact your drawing gives what appears to be the lap (7/32 " If I recall aright, the angle of advance on LBSC's Maid of Kent with Ken Harris' version of its Stephenson's Gear is around 35º. A loco is designed to be driven at speed on a very early cut-off, and the effect of that link motion is to increase the lead with notching-up, especially beyond what appears typical for a traction-engine. The usual plots for eccentric / crank geometry are the Zeuner or the Reauleaux Diagrams, or simplified versions, both quite easy to draw. They simply relate valve-travel to crank and eccentric positions at dead-centre, but not the port openings themselves, nor the full effects of all the bits of steel in between. |
Nigel Graham 2 | 19/02/2020 00:36:10 |
3293 forum posts 112 photos | Aaaarrrghh! Those blasted silly faces! I thought I'd given the spaces necessary to prevent them, and I cannot edit them out! |
Nigel Bennett | 19/02/2020 14:50:12 |
![]() 500 forum posts 31 photos | Posted by Nigel Graham 2 on 19/02/2020 00:36:10:
Aaaarrrghh! Those blasted silly faces! I thought I'd given the spaces necessary to prevent them, and I cannot edit them out! Perhaps you should use millimetres instead... it's the inch symbols coupled with the brackets that causes the problem! (I'll get me coat). |
Nigel Graham 2 | 08/03/2020 00:11:47 |
3293 forum posts 112 photos | Thanks Nigel! Yes- I know the cause but I'd forgotten! It would be beyond my computing knowledge but I do wonder if forum moderators are able to turn them off. In that case too the drawing given is in inches so replying in inches was appropriate. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.