Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Thread Gauges

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Chris TickTock28/08/2019 13:11:33
622 forum posts
46 photos

Hi I have bought a set of 3 thread gauges, the multi leaf variety.. One I do not understand. It is for measuring Whitworth and ranges from 62G-4g. eg one leaf has 60G1/16 marked on it. I understand whirorth have a parallel pipe thread that is G but are these gauges suitable for more prosaic bolts etc?

Regards

Chris

JasonB28/08/2019 13:27:34
avatar
25215 forum posts
3105 photos
1 articles
Posted by Chris TickTock on 28/08/2019 13:11:33:

60G1/16 marked on it.

A quick look at any Whitworth thread chart should give you a clue, look at the top line of this chart

Chris TickTock28/08/2019 13:36:26
622 forum posts
46 photos
Posted by JasonB on 28/08/2019 13:27:34:
Posted by Chris TickTock on 28/08/2019 13:11:33:

60G1/16 marked on it.

A quick look at any Whitworth thread chart should give you a clue, look at the top line of this chart

Thanks Jason so it actually correlates to TPI but then why the G?

Chris

Bazyle28/08/2019 13:47:51
avatar
6956 forum posts
229 photos

There was another thread questioning this last year. I think the G was just for 'gauge' or something German. It isn't a different size. Some leaves on mine have the G and some don't, probably gets left off as unnecessary when the die is updated.

Howard Lewis28/08/2019 13:51:42
7227 forum posts
21 photos

These Whitworth thread gauges will allow you to confirm the thread as a Whit form thread, (55 degrees as opposed to the 60 degree form of American National, Unified or Metric ).

The first number indicates the threads per inch, and the second the diameter in Inches, or fraction thereof, FOR BSW THREADS.

Often, in USA, threads will be designated in a similar manner, such as 1/4 - 20, although this will be likely to to refer to 1/4 UNC rather than 1/4 BSW.

Since the BSW and BSF forms are the same, these gauges can be used to check the pitch of BSF or BSP threads; although 20 tpi will be for 3/8 BSF, as well as for 1/4 BSW

The only pitches likely used on BSP (British Standard Pipe ) threads will be 28, 19, 14, or 11 tpi

American pipe (NTP , NSP etc ) threads will not be the same pitch as BSP, usually differing slightly, ( 1 tpi or so different ) and will be 60 degree form.

HTH

Howard

Edited By Howard Lewis on 28/08/2019 13:53:03

Michael Gilligan28/08/2019 14:19:07
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Bazyle on 28/08/2019 13:47:51:

There was another thread questioning this last year. I think the G was just for 'gauge' or something German.

.

**LINK**

https://www.model-engineer.co.uk/forums/postings.asp?th=107919

angel

Chris TickTock28/08/2019 14:19:12
622 forum posts
46 photos
Posted by Howard Lewis on 28/08/2019 13:51:42:

These Whitworth thread gauges will allow you to confirm the thread as a Whit form thread, (55 degrees as opposed to the 60 degree form of American National, Unified or Metric ).

The first number indicates the threads per inch, and the second the diameter in Inches, or fraction thereof, FOR BSW THREADS.

Often, in USA, threads will be designated in a similar manner, such as 1/4 - 20, although this will be likely to to refer to 1/4 UNC rather than 1/4 BSW.

Since the BSW and BSF forms are the same, these gauges can be used to check the pitch of BSF or BSP threads; although 20 tpi will be for 3/8 BSF, as well as for 1/4 BSW

The only pitches likely used on BSP (British Standard Pipe ) threads will be 28, 19, 14, or 11 tpi

American pipe (NTP , NSP etc ) threads will not be the same pitch as BSP, usually differing slightly, ( 1 tpi or so different ) and will be 60 degree form.

HTH

Howard

Edited By Howard Lewis on 28/08/2019 13:53:03

OK I think I am getting thos 'form' thing in relation to BSW and BSF you mean the waves are the same angle and shape but on the finer BSF the heights and lows are less. Therefore you would distinguish between the 2 threads by the profiles magnitude on the bolt or screw.

Chris

larry phelan 128/08/2019 17:24:34
1346 forum posts
15 photos

I use my gauges all the time in order to check some of the oddball threads I come across from time to time.

This helps to avoid what we used to call "SAD STORIES" !!

Howard Lewis28/08/2019 18:15:58
7227 forum posts
21 photos

What you call "waves" are the form of each thread.

In the case of Whitworth form threads, (BSW, BSF, BSP and BSB - British Standard Brass ) the angle of the thread is 55 degrees.

The Depth of the thread is related to the pitch, by a formula, which need not concern you as a user.

Thus, a 1/4 BSW is 20 tpi, with a depth of 0.0320", whereas a 3/8 BSF is 20 tpi and the depth is still 0.0320".

If it were a 1/4 BSF thread, it would be 26 tpi with a depth of 0.0246". So for a given size, the finer thread would have a shallower depth.

The 40 tpi Model Engineer series are Whit form, but have a thread depth of only 0.016"

If you do not have one, invest in a set of Zeus Charts. You will find them invaluable. I still use the ones that I bought as an Apprentice, back in 1958!

This lists the details of many sorts of threads, giving tpi, pitch, depth and core diameter, and in a separate table the correct tapping drill and clearance drill to be used.

Additionally, it includes allowances for when bending sheet metal, and Trigonometry tables, which you may also find useful

Find a Model Engineering Club near you, and join. You will then be likely to obtain actual hands on experience, with other more knowledgeable folk.

Howard

Fat Fingers strike again!

Edited By Howard Lewis on 28/08/2019 18:29:29

David Standing 128/08/2019 18:42:10
1297 forum posts
50 photos

I can only suggest, once again, you buy the five 'Workshop Practice' books I listed in your 'materials' thread.

Harold Hall's Metalworker's Data Book, no. 42 in the series, contains a huge amount of info on threads, and more.

The books are as cheap as chips on eBay, and worth their weight in gold.

I have two copies of no. 42, a dirty working copy in the workshop, and a clean reference copy in the man cave indoors.

Chris TickTock29/08/2019 08:51:59
622 forum posts
46 photos
Posted by Howard Lewis on 28/08/2019 18:15:58:

What you call "waves" are the form of each thread.

In the case of Whitworth form threads, (BSW, BSF, BSP and BSB - British Standard Brass ) the angle of the thread is 55 degrees.

The Depth of the thread is related to the pitch, by a formula, which need not concern you as a user.

Thus, a 1/4 BSW is 20 tpi, with a depth of 0.0320", whereas a 3/8 BSF is 20 tpi and the depth is still 0.0320".

If it were a 1/4 BSF thread, it would be 26 tpi with a depth of 0.0246". So for a given size, the finer thread would have a shallower depth.

The 40 tpi Model Engineer series are Whit form, but have a thread depth of only 0.016"

If you do not have one, invest in a set of Zeus Charts. You will find them invaluable. I still use the ones that I bought as an Apprentice, back in 1958!

This lists the details of many sorts of threads, giving tpi, pitch, depth and core diameter, and in a separate table the correct tapping drill and clearance drill to be used.

Additionally, it includes allowances for when bending sheet metal, and Trigonometry tables, which you may also find useful

Find a Model Engineering Club near you, and join. You will then be likely to obtain actual hands on experience, with other more knowledgeable folk.

Howard

Fat Fingers strike again!

Edited By Howard Lewis on 28/08/2019 18:29:29

Great post Howard I have the modern equivalent of the 1958 Cards found on the web. At this stage just being aware of the parameters of different threads should suffice as reference can then always be made.

Regards

Chris

Clive Foster29/08/2019 10:53:36
3630 forum posts
128 photos

When it comes to identifying unknown threads the compilation of threads in ascending size originally done by Andy Pugh and refined by other folk is pretty much unbeatable.

Much easier than normal listings 'cos you don't have to identify the thread type first.  Normal way is far better if you plan to cut threads tho'.

The essential "wot thread is it" identifier here :- **LINK** in text format which may need bit of massaging for easy reading.

A bit of web searching should find links to a pretty Excel file version, which I use.  Google should find a direct download link.

A pdf version here :- https://fromtheframeup.com/uploads/TT_Thread_size_chart.pdf 

There is also an HTML version here http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~bolo/workshop/thread.html.

Clive.

Edited By Clive Foster on 29/08/2019 11:03:36

Chris TickTock29/08/2019 21:26:57
622 forum posts
46 photos
Posted by Clive Foster on 29/08/2019 10:53:36:

When it comes to identifying unknown threads the compilation of threads in ascending size originally done by Andy Pugh and refined by other folk is pretty much unbeatable.

Much easier than normal listings 'cos you don't have to identify the thread type first. Normal way is far better if you plan to cut threads tho'.

The essential "wot thread is it" identifier here :- **LINK** in text format which may need bit of massaging for easy reading.

A bit of web searching should find links to a pretty Excel file version, which I use. Google should find a direct download link.

A pdf version here :- **LINK**

There is also an HTML version here **LINK**.

Clive.

Edited By Clive Foster on 29/08/2019 11:03:36

Great post Clive thanks

Chris

SillyOldDuffer30/08/2019 09:02:10
10668 forum posts
2415 photos

Putting threads into context:

  • Whitworth is the first standard thread, introduced about 1840, with 55° flanks. As a coarse thread Whitworth is well suited to the needs of Victorian and Heavy Engineering.
  • In the USA, 25 years after Whitworth, Seller's proposed an improved thread; similar to Whitworth but simplified for manufacture, and with a stronger 60° thread form.
  • On the Continent, where the metric system had almost entirely displaced local weights and measures, engineers developed coarse metric threads,
  • As Light and Precision engineering developed, it was found that Whitworth, Sellers and Coarse metric were all inappropriate for small diameter fasteners and for some materials, like Brass and Steel. Fine thread versions were added to all three systems, but even they didn't satisfy all needs, notably Bicycles, Electrical, Instrumentation, and Aircraft. This led to the introduction of other thread standards, notably BA in the UK. BA is a scientifically designed thread (for electrical and other light work) and is interesting because although metric, it was carefully converted to inch measure because the engineers of the day (including Whitworth), felt that British Workmen were too thick to take kindly to metric.
  • Over the same period, large numbers of other special threads were developed such as tapered threads for sealing joints on pipework, and square, buttress and ACME threads for power transmission. Some lasted, others faded away.
  • Taken as a whole, by 1930 the sheer number of incompatible threads were a major obstacle to trade. This came to a head during WW2 when joint US/British military operations were compromised because American Nuts, Bolts and Spanners were incompatible with their very similar British equivalents. Supply of spares was complicated and repairs delayed. Such a mess, that the USA and British switched to a common system, the main feature of which is a 60° thread. In consequence, Whitworth faded from mainstream use since 1940 and is now rarely found. (Except on heritage machinery.)
  • Since then, metrication has taken a heavy toll of Inch Threads. Dumping Whitworth fixed a compatibility problem between two close allies, but it did nothing for sales to the rest of the world. Today, apart perhaps from the USA, metric threads are almost universal in new equipment.
  • Much confusion is still evident; I've owned cars which mixed all the main thread systems on the same vehicle, spent a small fortune on spanners, and never had a full stock of spare bolts. There is a lot of older equipment worth repairing that's held together by obsolescent thread systems.

Navigating this mess can be a problem for hobbyists. Trying to follow an old British or new American Project Book can be deeply confusing. What made sense in 1949 may not in 2019, and stuff easily obtained in the USA may be hard to find in Europe. I'd recommend going metric if general purpose making or repairing new equipment is your bag. Makes more sense to go Imperial if renovating old equipment, building models to Imperial Plans, or grandad gives you a fully equipped Imperial workshop. There are hobbyists who need to work with both systems, and it's certainly possible to do metric work on an imperial lathe and vice versa. Less amusing if you have to buy full sets of Imperial and Metric drills, taps, dies, spanners etc. because it soon gets expensive.

As a budding clockmaker, before tooling up, it's worth looking at a number of designs to see what threads are recommended and trying to standardise. It's unlikely any clock plans will call for Whitworth! American designs might call for UNF, British for BA, and German metric. Actually it may not matter much because designs can be tweaked to use any thread system, but it's all time and trouble. I'd be interested to hear from proper Horologists which thread system(s) they use in practice?

Dave

Michael Gilligan30/08/2019 09:23:24
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 30/08/2019 09:02:10:

[ ... ]

As a budding clockmaker, before tooling up, it's worth looking at a number of designs to see what threads are recommended and trying to standardise. It's unlikely any clock plans will call for Whitworth! American designs might call for UNF, British for BA, and German metric. Actually it may not matter much because designs can be tweaked to use any thread system, but it's all time and trouble. I'd be interested to hear from proper Horologists which thread system(s) they use in practice?

.

Dave,

That would probably depend upon how you care to define 'proper Horologists'

... potentially even more contentious than defining 'Model Engineers' !!

Whitworth threads may well have been used on the great Turret Clocks, and Thury was the Swiss Standard for watches and small clocks ... Between those extremes pretty-much anything goes [including 'special' threads]

Perhaps the defining factor is that Horologists strive to keep things in good proportion ...

MichaelG.

Diogenes30/08/2019 09:53:29
61 forum posts
6 photos

Surely the term "Proper" in either discipline clearly refers to those who abstain from the use of Stainless Steel Socket Head Cap Screws?

Michael Gilligan30/08/2019 09:55:59
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos

smiley

JasonB30/08/2019 10:17:37
avatar
25215 forum posts
3105 photos
1 articles

So the black ones are OK thensmile p

I'm sure Whitworth Instrument thread has found it's way onto clocks etc in the past, so best not to generalise with the word "Whitworth"

Edited By JasonB on 30/08/2019 10:19:13

Nick Clarke 330/08/2019 10:52:13
avatar
1607 forum posts
69 photos
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 30/08/2019 09:02:10:
  • Taken as a whole, by 1930 the sheer number of incompatible threads were a major obstacle to trade. This came to a head during WW2 when joint US/British military operations were compromised because American Nuts, Bolts and Spanners were incompatible with their very similar British equivalents. Supply of spares was complicated and repairs delayed. Such a mess, that the USA and British switched to a common system, the main feature of which is a 60° thread. In consequence, Whitworth faded from mainstream use since 1940 and is now rarely found. (Except on heritage machinery.)

My Granddad had some American spanners in his shed that apparently came from his time in the RAF in WW2. He said that when Merlin engines came from this country you got an engine, but if it was a American built one it came with a full tool kit and spanners - presumably because of this incompatibility. (real or imagined I suppose)

Because each and every US engine came with the tool kit everyone in the hangar ended up with one when the F/Sgt wasn't looking!

ega30/08/2019 10:58:52
2805 forum posts
219 photos

SOD:

Thanks for the useful recap!

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate