ML10 vs 7x14 minilathe: Which is better

Recently come into ownership of a ML10 lathe that I would describe as a restoration project. Once restored it leaves me with two lathes of similar size.

Once the ML10 is restored which of the two lathes is the better one to keep?

From what I can tell of pictures

ML10

+ Slotted Cross Slide

+More robust backgearing

Minilathe

+Taper roller bearings

+Spares abundant

+Variable speed (ML10 VFD pending)

Difficult one! Most people will have one or the other and will probably favour the lathe they have.

I have an ML10 in good order and with sufficient bits and pieces to keep me happy. I suspect one of the real difficulties will be in the cost of accessories for an ML10. Just look at the asking prices for fixed and travelling steadies. Sit down before you do! having said that, such things are relatively straightforward to make. but do you want to make bits for your ML10 or make projects like locos?

Mini- lathes are getting to be very good in quality and spares are good and plentiful, not to mention inexpensive. ML10s command better prices second hand, in good nick. All a bit of a minefield to choose between the two.

I will stick to my ML10, although I suspect the overwhelming majority would say keep the mini lathe.

Andrew.

I think this has to be a question of personal preference and which machine you find the most pleasant and convenient to use for most jobs.

There's no 'right' answer. With a VFD the two machines will be very similar, main issue about the ML10 is lack of a tumbler reverse - how often do you cut left-hand threads and do you like boring 'out' of a blind hole?

The ML10 lacks a quick release tailstock, the mini lathe has no dog clutch on the leadscrew - both of these issues are easily addressed.

It might just come down to whether it's a long or short bed ML10.

Neil

If you really cannot tell which one is favoured, either keep both or toss a coin?

If the ML10 is imperial you have a perfect excuse

Brian