By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Take a look?

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
richardandtracy30/12/2016 16:52:45
avatar
943 forum posts
10 photos

There is (well in 2002 and it may have changed since) a limit of 2 Bar.Litres, so if 5 litres and 0.49 Bar, then still needs the CE mark because 5 x 0.49 = 2.45 Bar.Litres, and is greater than the limit of 2 Bar.Litres. I too thought that if below .5 Bar or 2 litres it was exempt, but in my 3 month study could find no regulatory basis for this belief, the one statement in its favour was contradicted in numerous other places.

The whole thing is such a minefield you begin to think it must be deliberate to give the regulators something to justify their existence.

Regards

Richard.

 

Edited By richardandtracy on 30/12/2016 16:53:30

Edited By richardandtracy on 30/12/2016 16:57:03

Michael Gilligan30/12/2016 17:29:11
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos

By no stretch of the imagination am I qualified to comment on this subject, but: My first point of reference [if I had the need to know] would be this: **LINK**

http://www.hse.gov.uk/pressure-systems/law.htm

A quick skim reveals two immediately interesting points:

[quote_1]

Simple Pressure Vessels (Safety) Regulations 1991 (SPV)

Simple pressure vessels have the following characteristics or limitations:

  1. intended to contain air or nitrogen at a gauge pressure >0.5 bar but less than or equal to 30 bar
  2. not intended to be exposed to flame

[quote_2]

A relevant fluid is:

  • steam at any pressure
Ajohnw30/12/2016 17:57:10
3631 forum posts
160 photos

I'm not convinced that any one is Michael. It's probably not a good idea to start looking at the standards side of things.

It is interesting to compare here with there though. Oz for instance - rather interesting as it gives an indication of what they have done there - 2 official certs for download.

**LINK**

It's what's needed really but I would hope that the rules do allow variations providing the strength requirements are met. Eg my embryonic boiler would probably have an excess of tubes passing through it which could mean that there was no need for stays. Maybe not thicker end plates as well.

Not much elsewhere. Panics about state boiler regs in the USA.

Looking at Oz they have turned it into a bit of a money go round. Nice round prices for booklets but not TOTT. On the other hand I am not sure what the exchange rate is now. What they have done though is attempted to preserve the hobby. They have also taken on a certain amount of liability.

John

-

Ajohnw31/12/2016 10:45:06
3631 forum posts
160 photos

The link to Oz leaves me wondering what % silver people use ?

John

-

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate