Choice of materials and the best thread-form for the worm and worm-wheel?
John Fielding | 16/05/2016 08:34:57 |
235 forum posts 15 photos | If I recall from my days of bell ringing, the main chandelier in the nave of St Paul's church in Durban has a ex Wellington bomber bomb winch mounted in the ringing chamber to lower the massive array when lamps needed to be changed. It is a hand wound contraption mounted on an ali bracket with lots of lightening holes, apparently salvaged from a crashed Wimpey at the end of WW2. Not sure what the chandelier weighed but the bomb winch handled up to 500lb bombs. It has a plate attached with its rating!
|
Michael Gilligan | 16/05/2016 09:38:30 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | I've just had a thought [a dangerous occurrence, I know] Given the infrequent use proposed for this device; might it be possible to make the wormwheels in the form of a 'lantern pinion' ? ... with the trundles skewed at the helix-angle of the worm. This would lend itself to manufacture on the Mill , and should be economical. MichaelG. |
Ajohnw | 16/05/2016 10:45:49 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | Posted by Nicholas Lee on 15/05/2016 15:14:52:
Dear John, It is a newly built house, and a suitable joist was installed. Above the joist is just the roof tiles, so there's no gap to install a winch in the ceiling. The Chandelier is in the middle of the ceiling, so there is nowhere to lean a ladder against, and a scaffold platform that high would cost circa £400 to hire each time, so a winch system was specified. The title of this "Beginner's Questions" forum thread is "Worm-Gear advice sought"; so why be sarcastic about me not knowing to search for some variant of of an epicyclic gear that I have never heard of? I was curious anyway, so I did try extensively Googling epicyclic gears, but all I found was several hundred examples of planetary gearboxes that all used a ring-gear with internal teeth. Maybe it totally obvious to you how to make one without an internal ring gear, but it is not obvious to me. I found one bizarre example that used planetary bevel gears, but that looked overly complicated. More searching led me to "differential spur gear trains". Is that perhaps what you are alluding to? Or, perhaps you meant a face-gear solution like this one? All these solutions looks like an awful lot of gear cutting, to achieve what one worm gear stage can do. Whilst it is an interesting subject, I think it might be academic for this application, given that we are lifting a load that requires the gearbox to be self-locking, and a worm-gearbox is best for that. Regarding multi-start vs. single-start worms, I found this friendly website, where it says that: "The worm drive inefficiency originates from the sliding contact between the teeth. A multi start thread has a steeper helix angle which results in less friction between the threads (so it is more efficient) and therefore such a system is less likely to be self-locking. It follows that a steeper helix allows for faster translation along the threads i.e. an item utilising a multi start thread can be tightened in fewer rotations than one using a single start thread." So, multi-start threads are more efficient, but that can back-drive (which is bad for this application), and they only give half the gear ratio (which is also bad for this application). Best Wishes Nick Lee
Edited By Nicholas Lee on 15/05/2016 15:15:29 I posted as shot of the arrangement in the other thread on epicyclic - I had time to take a shot when I posted in that one. The web page it's on has gone but the same info is available on the wayback machine here While multistart worms increase efficiency I believe that twin start worms are often used in motor gearboxes to increase their load carrying capacity. I doubt of a low pitch 2 start worm would drive backwards but as you have no lathe you would need to buy a tap to hob a worm wheel - can't say as I have ever seen any 2 start taps. I think Michael posted and idea that could be switched around a bit. A lantern wheel with a huge number of pins driven by a pinion. I suggest that the pinion would need to have 15 teeth minimum to get several acting at the same time. It could be hardened and tempered to increase it's strength. For the lantern wheel I would have thought that 3/16 dia silver steel as it comes would be fine for the pins providing it's supported at each end - sort of wheel with a groove around the periphery. Even 1/8 dia should do it providing there is very little unsupported length at each end. I'll leave stress calcs to some one else. The pitch would need to be greater than the dia suggests to provide clearance for simple teeth on the pinion. The flanks cut radially with a round or cycloid type end. This is the type of tooth form usually used on the gear rather than on the pinion. The pins to go with that would have a dia of 0.9 x the gap between the teeth, They would mesh when an arc drawn from the centre of the pinion passed through the centre of the tooth rad and the centre of the pins. The motor could drive the pinion via a couple of commercial bevel gears. John - PS Thanks for a copy of the pdf Keith. Edited By Ajohnw on 16/05/2016 10:46:44 Edited By Ajohnw on 16/05/2016 10:49:02 |
Ajohnw | 16/05/2016 10:57:10 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos |
John - |
john carruthers | 16/05/2016 11:51:42 |
![]() 617 forum posts 180 photos | It used to be quite common for amteur telescope makers to produce their own worms and wheels. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.