JasonB | 22/05/2023 13:13:03 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | There are still several sources for the holders that use the two obtuse corners from a CCMT or CCGT insert. I use them quite a lot particularly for roughing or heavy cuts as these two corners seem a bit more durable. Glanze (Chronos) APT do them and I think JBCutting still have them on their e-bay shop will all do reasonably priced holders. Depending on insert type some triangular ones give 6 usable edges as the neutral ones can be flipped upside down. My take on indexable was as I said eariler the insert can be indexed around in it's pocket . Industry does not just have one toolpost holder so they don't go swapping holders they simply change out an insert when worn and know the new one will go back in the same position so no changes to setup. "Insert" probably comes from them being inserted into a pocket in the holder.
PS I DO get on OK with Brazed tips |
Vic | 22/05/2023 13:17:25 |
3453 forum posts 23 photos | I sometimes use carbide inserts on my lathe and I don’t run them any faster than some of my HSS tools. Some of the bigger inserts do appear to be quite blunt compared to HSS and it seems they do need higher speed and pressure to cut. I don’t use this type of insert on my hobby lathe. Most of the inserts I use are of the sharp polished variety which work very well on small lathes. |
SillyOldDuffer | 22/05/2023 14:00:32 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Carbide inserts have two big advantages over HSS lathe tools, both of which make cutting metal cheaper. Carbide is harder and more heat resistant than HSS. Cutting edges last longer and at the same time can safely generate a lot of heat during the cut that softens the metal so more metal is removed per kilowatt. This alone justifies carbide. Secondly, carbide inserts are accurately moulded to shapes race-tuned for peak cutting efficiency; this saving big money in a production environment. And because inserts of a given type are identical they can be swapped in the tool-holder without resetting it, reducing downtime and labour costs. Further, as each insert comes with 2, 3 or 4 cutting points and edges, 'n' failed edges are quickly fixed by simply reindexing the insert. No skill is involved. In comparison using HSS is liable to bankrupt the company! Or would if it weren't for the dreaded Account-Ant. He or she makes short shrift of HSS fans by taking into all the costs into account. True HSS blanks are cheap but then:
Time and money are much less critical in a home workshop, where the general purpose nature of HSS pays off, especially for form tools. I find HSS tolerates mistakes better than carbide too, generally getting a decent finish no matter what. However, the indexability of inserts is very convenient. I think an ordinary 4-way tool-post with a set of pre-shimmed carbide insert tool holders is nearly as quick as a QCTP, and wins in the long run because carbide edges lasts a lot longer than HSS, and can be rotated. As always much depends on what the workshop is doing and why. I prefer carbide inserts most of the time, but not when HSS is better suited. Agood reason for staying loyal to HSS is owning a classic lathe - they're often too slow to get the best out of carbide. Although not as rigid or powerful as they should be, Far Eastern hobby lathes usually have high enough RPM to get results. Without stopping to do any grinding. Dave |
Tim Stevens | 22/05/2023 17:10:36 |
![]() 1779 forum posts 1 photos | SoD states: ... failed edges are quickly fixed by simply reindexing the insert. No skill is involved. Not necessarily. It is much too easy to drop the tiny screw, and it falls, inevitably, into the swarf it has just generated. And the tiny screws look exactly like the scrolls of metal in the swarf. Exactly ... Cheers, Tim |
Tony Pratt 1 | 22/05/2023 18:31:31 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | Posted by Tim Stevens on 22/05/2023 17:10:36:
SoD states: ... failed edges are quickly fixed by simply reindexing the insert. No skill is involved. Not necessarily. It is much too easy to drop the tiny screw, and it falls, inevitably, into the swarf it has just generated. And the tiny screws look exactly like the scrolls of metal in the swarf. Exactly ... Cheers, Tim Having done that once I now change my tips over a tobacco tin lid or similar. Tony |
Bdog507 | 30/05/2023 16:38:17 |
38 forum posts | Posted by Tony Pratt 1 on 22/05/2023 18:31:31:
Posted by Tim Stevens on 22/05/2023 17:10:36:
SoD states: ... failed edges are quickly fixed by simply reindexing the insert. No skill is involved. Not necessarily. It is much too easy to drop the tiny screw, and it falls, inevitably, into the swarf it has just generated. And the tiny screws look exactly like the scrolls of metal in the swarf. Exactly ... Cheers, Tim Having done that once I now change my tips over a tobacco tin lid or similar. Tony
Been there, done that! It's why most of us keep spare screws! 😄
Luckily for me most of my turning with larger inserts which are indexed after loosening a screw, & not removing it completely.
Cheers.
Stew. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.