In response to errors in the supplied table with HV6 dividing heads
This is a corrected table giving correct figures for dividing with the vertex HV6 dividing head.
Neil Wyatt | 27/02/2016 18:11:27 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Howard if you are able to confirm this error, I will upload a new pdf. Thanks, Neil |
Howard Lewis | 27/02/2016 20:01:34 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Apologies to everyone! Somehow, I managed to incorporate the very error that started this thread, because it has cost me so much time and material, and led to my making up the spreadsheet. Have checked and E mailed a corrected version of the chart to Neil who will post it as a PDF. 13 divisions SHOULD read "6 turns and 36 holes on a 39 hole plate" This is correct as I have now cut a good 13T gear, and it went into service yesterday. Again, abject apologies. Howard |
Neil Wyatt | 01/03/2016 09:36:43 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Howard has corrected his table and the article now links to a corrected PDF. Users of other dividing heads will be interested in Christopher Taylor's spreadsheet HERE. It can be customised to give solutions for any dividing head simply by changing the worm ratio and the numbers of holes available. Thanks to both Christopher and Howard. I will change the title of this thread slightly so users of other dividing heads as well as the HV6 can see it has useful information for them, Neil |
Danny Hegh | 13/03/2016 10:26:05 |
17 forum posts | as an apprentice I spent a lot of time on a mill cutting gears and sprockets the rules were do the calculations and get them checked by another take a cut of the first tooth just through enough to get the full depth of cut index the blank around 360 deg. and see if you wind up in the grove as it were.Takes a bit of time ,a bit of stress and the treasure chest getting too full.the problem is getting the chief of staff wised up on dividing head calcs |
Kathryn Truscott 1 | 04/11/2016 09:19:39 |
3 forum posts | Hi Guys, There's an error in Howard's Chart on the 94 tooth entry. The plate should be C-47, not 49. Not sure how to make this available on here and the usual procedures don't seem to work, but I have copies for anyone that needs them.
Cheers, |
Neil Wyatt | 04/11/2016 12:23:08 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Thanks Kathryn, Seems reasonable as 94 is twice 47! If anyone else can confirm this just to be sure, I can amend the spreadsheet. Howard? Neil
|
Michael Gilligan | 04/11/2016 12:40:52 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Kathryn Truscott 1 on 04/11/2016 09:19:39:
Hi Guys, There's an error in Howard's Chart on the 94 tooth entry. The plate should be C-47, not 49. .
From first principles ... 90:1 worm ratio 94 divisions requires 45 step increments on a 47 hole plate MichaelG.
|
Howard Lewis | 04/11/2016 13:04:32 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Sackcloth and ashes again! Obviously, I goofed with a formula somewhere in my copy and paste routines, either that of fat finger syndrome. Yes, please amend the spreadsheet Howard |
Neil Wyatt | 04/11/2016 14:12:36 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Thanks Howard. Actually the spreadsheet is correct! It's a typo in transposing to the pdf. I don't have the document used to generate the pdf version and I don't think I can edit it without spoiling the formatting. Could you email me a corrected pdf, please Howard? Neil Edited By Neil Wyatt on 04/11/2016 14:17:02 |
SillyOldDuffer | 04/11/2016 14:50:20 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Arggh! I find this table so useful that last Monday I laminated my copy to keep it clean. They say no good deed goes unpunished. Now I can't pencil in a correction... Dave |
Howard Lewis | 05/11/2016 16:02:27 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Hi Neil EXCEL Spreadsheet and my original revised HV6 Chart (WORD) sent as E mail attachments, (once I'd found them!) Howard
|
Kathryn Truscott 1 | 05/11/2016 20:38:26 |
3 forum posts | I have forwarded a copy of the revised chart to my vendor in NZ from whom I bought my RT. He has intimated that he will send it out to customers in future sales.
xo, |
Neil Wyatt | 05/11/2016 22:00:09 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Just looked - Acrobat is £11.42 a month, that's nearly twice what I pay for Microsoft Office 365! £20 a month on 'pay as you go'! Edited By Neil Wyatt on 05/11/2016 22:08:55 |
Neil Wyatt | 05/11/2016 22:05:43 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | OK, corrected and created a new PDF, the link in the article now points at the new version. Neil |
Kathryn Truscott 1 | 06/11/2016 04:35:26 |
3 forum posts | Good Heavens Neil, I din't pay anything close to that in NZ... just a few dollars a quarter..... I wonder why the discrepancy? Perhaps they take pity on us poor people down here in the South Pacific... |
SillyOldDuffer | 06/11/2016 09:27:57 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Many thanks for the update. If - like me - you can't remember where you got it from in the first place, it's HERE. Dave |
Neil Wyatt | 06/11/2016 12:20:18 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Or click on the article link at tew top of this thread N. |
Tony Zuiderwyk | 05/07/2017 06:24:27 |
![]() 7 forum posts 3 photos | There I was reading MEW254 'an emergency repair' and there lurking on the bottom of page 23 - shock, horror, the Vertex HV6 table has errors! I've had my HV6 for many years and mainly use it for cutting gears on the mill. Obviously I have been lucky and haven't needed one of the teeth counts with an error. Cutting gears like this is laborious and an error is costly in time and rework effort. So, let me thank everyone who has contributed to rectifying this. I have dutifully downloaded the PDF and Excel files. The old saying 'measure twice, cut once' applies. It pays to double check the calculations. It pays to read MEW too! I will check the OEM table on my HV8 now. Thanks again, Tony |
larry phelan 1 | 19/12/2018 17:00:50 |
1346 forum posts 15 photos | Yes Howard, I have found so many "Errors" with my 6" table that I no longer pay any heed to the "so-called-chart ",I tend to work it out instead. I dont know why they bother to supply these charts when they are not accurate,there is no excuse for it in this day and age. They are making these things long enough,at this stage to get it right. |
Michael Gilligan | 19/12/2018 17:12:15 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 06/11/2016 12:20:18:
Or click on the article link at tew top of this thread . A splendid example of being "hidden in plain sight" MichaelG. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.