Richard Kirkman 1 | 10/04/2020 16:35:11 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | Thanks Howard, yes it could have been better. But it feels smooth enough to me and it was bang on the size I wanted. So I just used it as is So much nicer to use now, it wasn't nice grabbing the handle and having it move in the wrong direction I think I'm going to give my 3 jaw a break down and a clean. Not that it's dirty or doesn't work, but I just fancy it. Who knows what I'll find I'm going to get some pieces of 100x100 steel square box section 5mm thick to raise the lathe on. Just need to measure how much I'll need. Would people recommend two pieces or three to support the lathe? |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 10/04/2020 23:15:16 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | Didn't bother with the 3 jaw in the end. Gave it a and lilittle clean and oil since it was off, but nothing more than that.
Then I took the coolant pump to pieces. I was surprised by what I found inside It seems I need to get the shaft out so I can dissasemble it further to replace the bearings. Any reccomendations for bearing type to replace with, and what type of grease or things to do? I'm not familiar with suds pumps. It's definitely not a very smooth runner
|
Phil Whitley | 11/04/2020 11:13:19 |
![]() 1533 forum posts 147 photos | Just treat it like a normal motor. plenty of online bearing suppliers, order on ID/ED , Don't buy the cheapest, you will get the lowest quality chinese bearings, and some of them are rubbish, SKF or RHP are good. Just use a normal LM high melting point grease same as you would use for car wheelbearings. You could try cleaning out the bearings you have, but from the noise it was making, I think they are shot! can you post up a pic of the top end of the motor where the flexi conduit goes in? The rotor may just pull out, but there could be a couple of bearing retainer screws inside the terminal box, as it is vertically mounted. The lower (or both) bearingd may be axial thrust types. Phil. Edited By Phil Whitley on 11/04/2020 11:19:57 Edited By Phil Whitley on 11/04/2020 11:21:08 |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 11/04/2020 11:23:42 |
334 forum posts 799 photos |
|
Phil Whitley | 11/04/2020 11:30:26 |
![]() 1533 forum posts 147 photos | Hi Richard, That looks like it just knocks out, and they look like standard bearings, should be about a fiver each! try tapping the outer race of the bearing with a socket, or suitable size piece of tube. Phil |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 11/04/2020 12:27:58 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | it came out nicely with a few taps Do I need to clean it carefully? or just normally? never dealt with motors before |
Robert Atkinson 2 | 11/04/2020 13:23:28 |
![]() 1891 forum posts 37 photos | Normal cleaning of the motor is fine. Remove surface rust from the rotor but dont worry about making it pretty. For the laminations in the stator I'd just use a nylon brush to remove loose material. You must be careful not to damage the insulation on the windings. Robert G8RPI. |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 11/04/2020 20:24:05 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | Didn't bother cleaning it too much today. But did spend a very long time just trying to get the bearings off the shafts. One came off very easily. Then the other was a pain Anyway, long story short, I snapped my vice Still, the bearings are off and it was a very cheap vice I've found replacements, they're the right size. But will the type of bearing be okay? I'll double check the sizes before I order |
Phil Whitley | 12/04/2020 14:56:38 |
![]() 1533 forum posts 147 photos | Hi Richard, yes those bearings should be fine, the old ones weren't sealed, and suffered because of it. I use a tiny flat jewellers screwdriver to carefully remove the seal on one side, add some grease, about 3/4 full for this application, then refit the seal. They are not really "seals" in the true sense of the word, just dust covers. You will be amazed at how little the manufacturers put in! If one side of the shaft was very tight on the bearing, you can reduce the interference a bit with some emery tape, they will have been power pressed on! Phil. |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 12/04/2020 15:45:44 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | I'll do that when they arrive. It might be a few days due to easter. I need to double check the measurements before I order them. The shaft had mushroomed ver a bit, probably my fault, so I'll have to sort that out before I put any new bearings on |
Howard Lewis | 12/04/2020 19:05:03 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Oh Dear! Maybe the one that broke up was the one making the noise? Do make up dollies for fitting the new bearings to minimise risk of damage. Pity about the vice. Cast iron is comparatively weak in tension. If you can find one, an iron vice would be better, but might be more expensive. Actually, if you PM me, I may be to put you in touch with a source. Howard |
Phil Whitley | 12/04/2020 19:51:39 |
![]() 1533 forum posts 147 photos | Hi Richard, this vice is fabricated steel rather than cast iron, and not expensive! https://www.amazon.co.uk/Siegen-S01082-125mm-Steel-Fabricated/dp/B01MF7Y4KK I bought one of these https://johnstownbridgeservicestation.ie/product/6-fabricated-steel-vice/ from my paint and tool van when they first came out in the seventies, it was £24.00! Exactly the same design today, but a bit more expensive. It has resisted all my attempts to break it in any way. I think I have broken two or three cast ones in that time! Phil. |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 12/04/2020 20:35:46 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | Bearings ordered, who knows when they'll turn up. I finished painting the 4 jaw chuck yesterday, so I reassembled that today and finished some assignments I think I'll wait and find myself an old record quick release vice or something like that, although I do like a swivel base I think the one that broke was just my fault really. I'm sure fitting new ones will be pretty easy. I need to turn the tracking wheel from my belt grinder to a different shape since when I made it, I did it the wrong shape for belts to track well on it! |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 13/04/2020 20:04:43 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | I had a lot of fun today. i finally reprofiled the tracking wheel from my belt grinder. Initially when I made the sander, I didn't know about belt tracking as much, so I made the wheel this shape The wheel was too peaked and didn't track as smoothly as it could have done. I tried to fix this at college when I made it, but the mandrel that it had been turned on was not properly concentric. So when I tried to turn it, the wheel wasn't round and it cut one side but not the other. So I solved this today. I used the 3 jaw to make myself a new mandrel and washer to hold the wheel in the 4 jaw, then I turned the wheel down so it was closer to the recommended dimensions from I hadn't ever used a 4 jaw chuck before today. I found dialing in the chuck to be quite satisfying, once I got to grips with it. I also got to use my spring center for the first time! Very handy I aligned the mandrel in the 4 jaw chuck first, centering that up. Then I put the wheel on and centered it to that. I probably could have just done the wheel, but I wanted the practice Very good looking chuck i think I didn't need to take much off but I tried to get a really good finish The bottom right corner of the lathe was bent so i thought i'd bend it back a little. Not perfect, but better than it was. I also gave the cupboard a clean so I can put the chuck away nice and dirt free
|
Phil Whitley | 14/04/2020 11:46:18 |
![]() 1533 forum posts 147 photos | Hi Richard, looking at your last picture, is that a fixing hole in the base of the cupboard, or is it a threaded jacking point? According to your manual, which is correct for both our machines, because we both have the earlier 2 slot apron "levelling screws were not fitted to cabinet models, only to leg models" but according to my slightly later "1.5" model manual with the safety apron, there are leveling screws. I suppose tt all depends on whether they changed to the later cabinets at the same time as the later apron came in! Aslo in your manual there IS details of testing for twist in the bed and levelling, but not in mine. Also. if you read the blurb on www.lathes.co.uk/colchester he says that the very early students had a 6" centre height, but they changed to 6.5" centre height early in production to make the centre height the same across all the different bed lengths and models of this size. The names "Student" and "Master" (of both the Mk. 1 and Mk. 2 designations) refer, in effect, to the centre height and bed length - the Student being 6" x 24" and the Master 6.5" x 36" - for, in all other respects, the lathes were identical (in reality, most Student lathes appear to have been built with a 6.5-inch centre height - so beware if buying a replacement tailstock). Although the specification laid down in the sales literature was quite unambiguous, the factory would build a batch of machines with any modifications (or mixture of features) that the customer desired and the author has seen, over the years, examples that combine almost as many changes and adaptations to the previous differences as could be imagined. The factory even offered "special single or two-tone colour finishes" and the option of chromium-plated control levers and handwheels. However, one unvarying feature was that, on gap-bed lathes, the carriage-traverse handwheel was positioned on the right-hand side of the apron and on straight-bed machines it was always to the left. Just goes to show that machines may "look" the same, but have widely differing details! Good work on the pulleys! Phil.
|
Richard Kirkman 1 | 14/04/2020 17:22:15 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | The hole isn't threaded. I don't think it's a good place for a foot anyway since it's not the most reinforced part of the base. the mk1.5 had 6 feet, so I think we're on a different base as you can see The pulley may still need re-doing since the crown isn't perfectly centered. probably about 5mm off since when it was originally done, the man who made it for me did it wrong Edited By Richard Kirkman 1 on 14/04/2020 17:23:00 |
Richard Kirkman 1 | 14/04/2020 17:44:32 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | Also, the transformer for the lighting has been dispatched so it will be here tomorrow. What led do I need? It's just a normal bayonet fitting, but do I need any special form of bulb? |
Phil Whitley | 14/04/2020 18:40:46 |
![]() 1533 forum posts 147 photos | yes, you are right, it would not be a good place for a foot, but it does look like a fixing position. Is that pic of the screw foot on your lathe? I have nothing like that on mine! It is possible that you may have to change the lampholder from BC to sonething else, or get a BC adapter, and fit another lampholder to it. You can buy these https://bedazzledledlighting.co.uk/product-category/led-bulbs/bc-b22/ which will fit into the BC direct, and are available in 12v and 24v, or you could source a cheaper LED 12v bulb, and adapt a BC adapter to make it fit. There are ready made adapters on the market, but they are mainly for 240v bulb types, like the GU10. I dont think you will be able to but a direct adapter from BC to something that will take a 12v led because of the obvious safety risks. Phil |
Phil Whitley | 14/04/2020 19:54:01 |
![]() 1533 forum posts 147 photos | Get the cool white one!
|
Richard Kirkman 1 | 14/04/2020 23:41:48 |
334 forum posts 799 photos | No that's not my lathe, that's a mk1.5
I've just spent ages looking through google. No where seems to have the right stuff apart from your link Phil. Shall I order one of these...
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.