Here is a list of all the postings Sam Stones has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: radius dresser |
07/01/2011 04:04:26 |
Hi Nobby,
JasonB is correct.
However, by making a cutter cranked towards the lathe chuck, you can generate a complete sphere. It certainly won't be as rigid as the straight cutter in your device.
In ME years ago, there was a spherical turning attachment described. I've no reference to it but you can see a photograph of the one I made in my album entitled `Stop Gaps'.
Regards,
Sam |
Thread: The Case for Clocks |
30/12/2010 04:01:42 |
Norman, Sorry for the delay in answering your question about ultrasonic cleaners. I can only reiterate Tony's answer. It does seem to work OK for smaller items. The stainless steel tank measures about 90mm ID and is about 40mm deep. The base of the tank is fairly well rounded, which further limits the size of items to be cleaned. I have to assume that the transducer is connected to the centre of the tank, which also appears to be isolated from the casing via a rubber seal at the top edge of the cleaner. By causing cavitation around dirt etc., it appears to lift off loose particles which either begin to accumulate on the bottom of the tank, or as scum on the surface of the solution. I generally use diluted washing-up liquid (about 1/3 of the tank volume), but I feel sure there would be a better solution. I'm not too keen on using anything aggressive, especially after having imparted a high polish to the various brass components. I trust this helps. Regards, Sam |
30/12/2010 02:38:33 |
Hi David, Thank you for your posting. I have to admit to only ever making one case similar to your description. It was made to enclose and protect a model of the Wasa Sailing Ship by Airfix, which had received a considerable amount of my time and patience. For each length of the framework, I actually joined together three quadrants to form the 90deg internal angle (L). A sort of 3/4 quadrant.
There was a lot of work in fabricating the corner-joints, but the end result was a nicely rounded outer profile. It was also a much bigger case than the one I need for the skeleton clock. I'll be heading to my local hardware store once the clock is finished and ticking.
BTW, I have breathed life into it, but only with torque supplied manually. I still have to work on the main spring to fusee coupling, and find a neat way to stop the bell hammer from bouncing on the edge of the bell.
Thanks for your input, and thanks to everyone who has offered their help.
Regards,
Sam Edited By Sam Stones on 30/12/2010 02:39:47 |
Thread: Rulers - my pet peeve |
29/12/2010 00:45:05 |
John, It’s the same sort of Imperial/metric mixture on my Toledo rules (150mm and 300mm). I’m into metric, so the flip-side hardly gets used. Now for a couple more digressions. My father, who was born in 1913, was adamant that it’s a rule not a ruler. Fortunately, it didn’t need a whack across my knuckles to hammer home the point. That only occurred at school and for different reasons. It just goes to show that violence wasn’t really necessary after all. As part of my apprenticeship, I had a six-month spell in the DO c.1953. It didn’t take long to be caught using my slide-rule to do some calculations. The section leader told me to burn it. "We use longhand or six-figure logs in here!" he declared. During exams at Tech., we were obliged to tape over all those useful formulae printed on the backs of our slide rules. Regards, Sam |
Thread: Chinese lathes |
28/12/2010 02:28:23 |
John S,
That's a brilliant suggestion.
In all my 60+ years of lathe-work, I have never even heard of it.
Would you also add for beginners, that a calibrated hand-wheel on the end of the main leadscrew would be useful under these circumstances?
Sam |
Thread: Aircraft General Discussion |
24/12/2010 04:14:49 |
I echo Ramon’s closing remarks too. Well done Mr Olsen. Two years in the RAF as a ground wireless mechanic brought me many interesting experiences. But first :- Hi Len, That clip (the guy losing a wing) was doing the rounds a few months ago, and a friend in my email circuit suggested it was a model. I don’t believe that myself, but would there really be enough lift from the fuselage, or was it mainly engine grunt? Re:
Geoff Theasby's mention of the Shackleton. In Cyprus mid 50's, the RAF used them for coastal patrol. The three hour round trip at 1000' was most pleasant for invited (RAF) guests, as were the fifteen minutes lying full length on the slotted mattress with one’s head and shoulders poking out through the rear tail blister. Hardly surprising to see the aircrew smiling to each other. Don’t ask!!! Around about the same time, I had the pleasure of being flown to Aden in an RAF Hastings. In those aircraft, it was a two day trip with an overnight stop in hot, sticky, sweaty Bahrain, where a broken-down Pepsi Cola machine could only deliver tepid drinks. The return flight was in a DC3. Speaking of noise, there was hardly any damping in the fuselage of either aircraft. Under canvas alongside the east/west runway of RAF Nicosia, perhaps the most impressive experience was having fourteen Bristol Beverlies arrive overnight. Then to watch them take off a few days later with virtually no load. They climbed looking more like fighter aircraft but rather slower. Just sort of hanging there. From this same vantage point we could see aircraft like the Canberra, the Hunter, the Venom, the Meteor, the Gannet (I saw one land on its bomb-doors when the nose-wheel failed to lock down). Then we had the Comet, the Britannia, the Viscount, and other commercial aircraft coming and going. There was even a mock dog-fight between two Hunters and three Venoms. The tighter turning circle of the Venoms allowed them to get in behind the Hunters. Here’s part of an email from an engineering friend who lived in the same Lancashire town in which I grew up.
He wrote :-
While at De-Havs at Hatfield I worked in the vibration section for a period and was involved in the testing and research to find the problems that brought and virtually killed off the Comet 1 and 2. We had a duplicate Comet fuselage in a water tank and carried out similar tests to those at the British Aircraft establishment at Farnborough. The Comet 4 airframe is still in service and known as the Nimrod and looks awesome and very menacing. It can now defend itself for it carries a formidable range of weaponry. The Americans were given all the reasons and the data surrounding the metal fatigue problems. Without that info their 707 would have suffered the same fate. The stress of test flying began to take its toll which resulted in leaving De-Havilland’s to return home to a place I vowed never to visit or live in again. I began to have nightmares and cold sweats that left me in the morning rather exhausted.
The final incident was taking off from Hatfield in our Comet on a lovely summers day. The ground crew always stood at the departure point to wave us on our way. We received take off clearance and with all engines at full power set off down the runway. The first smell of trouble was the pilot saying to the co pilot "is that an aircraft coming into land" The pilot then politely requested a little more forcefully that the control tower should get that F@#$# aircraft out of the way. The tower did not respond. I thought it rather odd to see all our ground grew running as though in a hurry. My next reflection was how green the grass looked and then with barely enough flying speed the shuddering Comet virtually standing on its wing, 90 degrees to the ground roared across the airfield and over the boundary fence terrifying all the residence and the draughtsmen on the second floor of their building as it passed by. And that was the end of my brush with fame and I realised at that moment that I was not made of "the right stuff" "It was however a chance to get drunk and tell extravagant tales." However, the warmest feeling I have for an aircraft was c1942, and being buzzed by a Spitfire. I was standing on the flat roof of an air-raid shelter, which happened to be one of those places kids could climb onto. The experience lasted about three seconds as it zipped over our heads. I still have an image of the structural detail underneath. From my child’s eye, I’d guess he was less than 100'. This is a wonderful age we live in, and this seems the right time of the year to reflect. Compliments of the Season to you all, Sam Edited By Sam Stones on 24/12/2010 04:21:45 |
Thread: Cleaning up after Silver soldering (brazing) |
19/12/2010 03:08:13 |
Nick,
Now you've got me thinking. My grandfather married into a family of Cab Proprietors, but this is now getting too far from Silver Soldering. Perhaps we should continue this on a private basis? Sam |
18/12/2010 23:47:33 |
Hi Nick, Apologies to Clive also! I know this is something of a digression from Silver Soldering, but . . . On his marriage certificate c1910, my grandfather’s occupation indicates that he was an Agricultural Engineer. I have admired this detail since I seem to have followed suit. However, in those days, would an agricultural engineer be more of a blacksmith? Regards to all, Sam |
Thread: Mild Steel as material for gears |
16/12/2010 02:46:11 |
Hi Mogens,
Although I have only built one clock (which, as you can see in my various postings and pictures, still needs more work), I can assure you it has been a very eventful and edifying experience. Knowing what I know now, I doubt that I would have disregarded the recommendation by a clock-maker/antique dealer to convert the design to that of a pendulum time-piece. Actually, in my mind, that would have been a disaster in itself, since the clock relies upon both appearance and animation. For me to achieve this, it has meant a fair degree of study, some testing, some calculations, and some searching for alternative materials, eg. the spring. It has also involved some very generous people via this forum, and from other places. As for choice of materials, the original design of the skeleton clock had the frames in mild steel, whereas I chose brass for reasons as suggested above, and as a better bearing material. I think it look better too. Others even use ball bearings for their pivots, which will clearly reduce the friction and wear elements. Send me a PM if you wish to continue these ideas in greater depth. Good luck, Sam |
Thread: Lignum vitae under the saddle? |
09/12/2010 22:44:45 |
Andrew,
I can't pick your accent!
Sam |
Thread: You are going to the Model Engineer Exhibition aren't you? |
08/12/2010 03:08:48 |
I'll be thinking of you, Andrew.
Sam
Melbourne, Australia |
Thread: End mills in a drill chuck |
07/12/2010 23:54:13 |
I've come in on this thread rather late (or early if you live in Fiji, NZ or Australia), and have not taken the trouble to read all the postings.
But surely, isn't there some particular skill needed in being able to hit the `STOP' button, when the drill chuck drops onto the workpiece?
Or worse, when it lands onto the table?
Sam |
Thread: Rolled threads |
07/12/2010 04:53:39 |
Thanks John,
I was beginning to doubt my observations.
The 1/8" pitch leadscrew came with the Norton-style gearbox, when I bought it c1965.
A great step forward for me.
Regards,
Sam |
07/12/2010 04:19:03 |
Did my eyes deceive me, or did Myford roll the threads on their leadscrews? There are faint marks on the thread crests near the start and finish which suggest this.
Sam |
Thread: Workshop floor |
04/12/2010 02:33:17 |
When I was a Leak HiFi buff back in the 60's, attempting to achieve a reasonable setup, I set the force on the stylus to about 1gram. Unfortunately, there was significant pick-up bounce due to a springy wooden floor, thus turning the sounds from any disc into versions of the 1812.
Like Richard Parson's idea, but without SWAMBO's approval, I planned to drill holes through the floor, and then cast concrete pillars beneath each of the four legs of the HiFi unit. It needed some thinking about because the wooden floor was at least two feet above ground level. You outdoor railway chaps will be familiar with the problem.
However, I never got that far before migrating to Australia, where most modern houses are built on concrete slabs. Sadly, my HiFi cabinet now resides down the local tip, while the amps etc. were sold off.
Of mice and men.
Regards,
Sam Edited By Sam Stones on 04/12/2010 02:35:30 |
Thread: Metal forbearing |
04/12/2010 01:57:29 |
On a warm, sticky, Saturday afternoon in Melbourne, too warm for my garage `workshop', it passed through my mind that some of you would relish a go at the following :-
Being of the unqualified ilk in issues of tribology (ie. the science and engineering of interacting surfaces in relative motion), I have often pondered over the relationship between soft and hard materials. Controversially, at least for those of us who have observed certain symptoms of wear, we are led to believe (superficially), that the softer material is the more likely to wear.
Yet there are a myriad of examples where this appears opposite.
For example, (starting in the bathroom) - at the gum-line across my top incisors, there are grooves where toothbrush bristles have been rubbed to excess well before I learned about circular movement. Professionals of the dental kind usually advise us to use a soft toothbrush. As engineers, we know from experience that there’s trouble afoot with that concept. In another example, this time in the workshop, holes and other surfaces in (say) steel, are generally lapped using a softer metal such as brass. I was privy to tests with a motor mower which, for some reason, showed that plastic gears survived the environmental onslaught much longer than the metal gears they meshed with. The engine of my first mode of (powered) transport was a Cyclemaster, installed into the rear wheel of a bicycle. Unfortunately, the previous owner had failed to properly replace one of the circlips intended to hold the gudgeon pin central inside the piston. Several parts had become damaged when the circlip came adrift and buried itself into the side of the piston. What surprised me was that the old (hardened) gudgeon pin was significantly worn away where the bronze, little-end bearing made contact with the pin during use. From memory, the one-sided wear pattern on the pin was at least 0.5mm deep. Even more surprising was that a new gudgeon pin fitted perfectly into the original little-end bush made of bronze. In other words, the softer bush showed no obvious signs of wear, yet the gudgeon needed to be replaced. I’m fairly convinced that I know most of the answers, but only from experience, not from a tribology standpoint. What are your views? Regards, Sam Edited By Sam Stones on 04/12/2010 02:07:30 |
Thread: More bits of the skeleton clock |
02/12/2010 06:10:08 |
Hi Norman, Thanks for your comments wrt my latest posting.
Today in fact, we drove down to a place called Hastings for lunch, and then to watch the pelicans. It was pouring with rain on the way down. Then we had several hours of glorious sunshine, which turned into an enormous electric storm soon after we arrived home. As I write, our street is almost completely flooded.
As for the clock case, thanks for asking.
I think it will be a simple acrylic box. Perhaps with the corners hidden with wooden quadrant, or small aluminium angle. I’m still concerned about getting a steady glue-line.
Hi TerryD, Thanks for your comments too! If only I didn’t let the file slip occasionally. I'm not as steady as I used to be. Mind you, using the magnifier helps a lot. When I first started to read about clock making, it became a very humbling experience to learn how they used to work.
WITHOUT machines in most cases!!!
Regards to all, Sam Edited By Sam Stones on 02/12/2010 06:11:30 |
01/12/2010 22:33:13 |
With a series of medical issues taking up my time, my progress in completing the skeleton clock has slowed to a crawl. Add to this, the variable Melbourne climate gives me less encouragement to stand bent over a lathe in the hot garage.
Got any snow to spare?
However, I've introduced another picture album with four photographs showing a part of the escapement, and the action of the Lever from which the clock gets its name.
At the photographic magnification I used, the high polish on the lever can hardly be seen. The surfaces less accessible (especially the edges), look as if the lever was cut out with an oxy torch.
![]() Regards,
Sam |
Thread: Chinese lathes |
23/11/2010 20:06:26 |
Richard,
Although the message was perhaps unreadable, my theory is that the piece of paper was one or other of the following :-
A `Do Not Open’ instruction, ie. the type of message you can only read if you DO open IT. A piece of `Kilroy was Here’ graffiti. An order for Fish & Chips - (Home-Delivery). A `help/rescue’ note from Sum Ting Wong.
Sam
![]() |
22/11/2010 00:08:43 |
Having been responsible for hitting a very obvious raw nerve, when I picked up on Lathejack’s photographs, I could see that they were telling the truth admirably. So, I have a couple of comments to add. Firstly, how about directing expletives towards the junk on offer, rather than towards your fellow ME members? I have had lots of opportunities to curse at poor quality, so to repeat my warning for beginners - BUYER BEWARE. If you don’t know how, finding Lathejack’s great photographs is easy. As of Monday 22/11/10 11am, fifteen are currently top of the `Albums’ list. Three steps down, and there are four more pictures. Both albums are titled Chinese torture. Click on Albums on the green band across the top of the ME page. For many reasons, I shall never buy another machine wherever they are made. But, is the gist of these messages that - if you buy cheap it becomes mandatory to do a complete strip down? As for `jumping through hoops’, I doubt whether our local machine-tool trader would even know (or care) what a hoop was, let alone be prepared to jump through one. I would hope that this information (especially with the likes of Lathejack’s photographs and clear documentation), provides a powerful message for those with little or no knowledge of what to expect, but who are about to venture into our wonderful hobby. Good show, Lathejack. As a foot note. I know that local toolmakers are sending drawings into Asia, on the basis that what they get back will have to be rectified and finished off to a higher standard.
What a pity!!!
Regards to all, Sam Edited By Sam Stones on 22/11/2010 00:11:22 Edited By Sam Stones on 22/11/2010 00:13:28 |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.