By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Stepper Driver Query

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
joegib19/12/2012 10:04:26
154 forum posts
18 photos

Hi Gents,

I'd appreciate some advice regarding a Chinese-sourced stepper driver I've recently acquired. Here's a picture of the of the driver PCB:

tb_driver.jpg

(Click to enlarge)

— and this is the relevant Ebay listing showing such 'documentation' as is available for the board:

Ebay Listing

The simple stepper driver boards I've used in the past have only required me to set the Current Limit and the Stepping Fraction (this board refers to these as 'Current Settings' and 'Excitation Mode'. However, this board also includes 2 further settings designated:

(a) Torque Settings — 20%, 50%, 75%, 100% (DIP default set at 100%)

(b) Decay Mode — 0%, 25%, 50%, 100% (DIP default set at 100%)

I've done some Googling but really, I'm none the wiser regarding what these 2 settings mean in the context of this board and the purpose I have in mind. I plan to use this driver in a Steve Ward ('Kwackers' Electronic Division Control Box (Division Master clone). It will drive a motor hooked up to a small homebrew dividing head used purely for circular positioning. I don't intend to use it for rotational machining i.e circular routing or edging.

My instinct is to leave these 2 settings at their defaults and get on with the project! Can someone who knows what's what confirm that that's OK, please? Or is there some reason why is might be desirable to change these settings?

Thanks

Joe

Edited By joegib on 19/12/2012 10:05:19

Edited By joegib on 19/12/2012 10:07:26

Edited By joegib on 19/12/2012 10:08:49

jason udall19/12/2012 10:17:02
2032 forum posts
41 photos

tosh's app note might help pdf..I see reference to decay wave forms

Les Jones 119/12/2012 10:19:27
2292 forum posts
159 photos

Hi Joe,
You may find the data sheet on the IC used on the board explains the setting so that you can set them to match your use of the board. I found the data sheet HERE.

Les

Tony Jeffree19/12/2012 10:30:41
avatar
569 forum posts
20 photos

Joe -

The torque setting determines the current when the motor is not being stepped. The default (100%) says that the motor current will be 100% of the current that you have selected on the current limit setting. If you select (say) the 50% setting, then the drivers drop to half of the selected current setting when the motors are not being stepped. This helps with keeping the motors cool when they aren't moving an axis.

Regards,

Tony

joegib19/12/2012 17:29:46
154 forum posts
18 photos

Les and Jason,

Thanks for linking those data sheets. They've helped to clear the mists a bit.

Tony

Thanks for that clear explanation of the Torque Settings adjustments. The crucial factor for the way I want to operate the dividing head is Holding Torque rather than Dynamic Torque — the motor needs to maintain the indexed position and resist side thrusts arising from cutting operations. So, if I were to reduce current delivery below 100% while the motor's stationary, presumably I would be reducing the Holding Torque proportionately. Since that's not desirable it seems sensible to maintain current at 100% while keeping an eye on heat generation/dissipation in the early days of operation.

Is that a reasonable approach, please?

Joe

PS — I must say, it's very generous of you to help someone who's building an alternative to your own design. wink

Tony Jeffree20/12/2012 23:01:51
avatar
569 forum posts
20 photos

Joe -

Your assumptions are correct - the holding torque is directly proportional to the motor current. So if holding position is important to you, then leave it at 100%. However, if you are using a worm drive for the dividing head, there is very little possibility of back-driving it, so the holding torque requirement is minimal. If you aren't using a worm drive, seriously consider changing your design smiley

I have no problem whatever with people building alternatives to my design - after all, it isn't as if Divisionmaster was the first stand-alone rotary controller in the world. Mine is better of course...wink

Regards,

Tony

joegib21/12/2012 04:53:58
154 forum posts
18 photos

Yes, I'll be using worm drive for the unit. Anyway, your comments suggest I've got more room for manoeuvre than I thought.

Thanks again

Joe

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate