Finishing the pin of a one piece crank
DiogenesII | 06/03/2022 10:43:54 |
859 forum posts 268 photos | I need to size and finish a big end journal between the webs of a one piece single throw crank for an IC engine. The pin is 10mm x 10mm, the throw also. Plan A is to make a spilt lap of the 'wash tongs' type - What is a good width to make the lap to help avoid either barrelling or waisting of the pin? - opinions in the literature seem to vary from 'accurately-finished full width' to 'narrow, work it up and down to remove high spots'. I can see potential pitfalls in both of these methods, I'm sure that there is some happy middle ground. As I already have some hours invested in the part, I'd rather not experiment myself if anyone has achieved consistent and trustworthy results from a particular design/dimension - there's little point re-inventing the wheel.. I'd love to hear from you.
|
Howard Lewis | 06/03/2022 14:27:14 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | In this instance, the object is probably to produce a good surface finish, rather than to finish to a particular size? If the bearing were pressure fed lubricated whitemetal (Such as Aluminium Tin, Aluminium/Silicon ), subjected to high rubbing speeds and loads, the clearances would probably be 0.002 to 0.004" (0.050 to 0.1 mm) with a surface finish of not more 6 micro inch Centre Line Average The parts of a model are dimensionally small, so clearances of the order of 0..001 - 0.002" (0.025 - 0,05 mm ) would probably be more likely to be suitable. In the case of a model, the lubricant is unlikely to be pressure fed, but to be applied manually to a steel / yellow metal bearing, not subject to high speeds and loads, but the pin will still need to be polished to a fine finish to avoid wear. Barelling or taper, of the order of a few microns is unlikely to prove much of a problem. Maintaining a small smooth radius in the fillets smoothly blended between pin and web will be beneficial avoiding stress raisers, although, again, fatigue failure should not be a worry in a model The Great Western Railway were quite precise in their manufacture of locomotive parts, but when, many years later, King George Vth was rebuilt, it soon ran a hot box, because the clearances had been made too small! Howard |
DiogenesII | 07/03/2022 08:44:10 |
859 forum posts 268 photos | Thanks, Howard The main object is to produce a good bearing surface, sizing being a secondary consideration. I'm currently +0.1mm over target 10mm, I need to increase corner radius / examine the score marks / apply a slip to my 'stuck-out' parting blade before comitting to another pass - interesting watching the lead corner 'pull-in' on either traverse! I digress - yes, I need make it 'round', straight, and polished - I have a nice piece of HE15 with which to make a conrod, I have a measure of cconfidence that this will run acceptably on a steel journal provided everything is as it should be. (..on a model, of course..) |
JasonB | 07/03/2022 13:00:07 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | I tend to finish crank pins with fine emery backed by a stick or flat metal bar which is a couple of mm narrower than the gap between the webs. Others tend to use a pair of flat sticks or oil stones and pinch the crankpin between those. |
DiogenesII | 07/03/2022 13:13:55 |
859 forum posts 268 photos | Thanks, Jason, that sounds good, will give it a go. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.