Chris TickTock | 22/08/2019 11:45:57 |
622 forum posts 46 photos | Hi, what would be very useful is for me to be pointed in the direction of a table showing the potential hardness that can be achieved with the various metals we would commonly use in home machining. I believe this is called the Rockwell index but stand to be corrected. Regards Chris |
Howard Lewis | 22/08/2019 12:27:14 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Harness of metals, usually steel, can be stated in different units, depending upon the machine and method used. it can be Firth, or Vickers, Rockwell, Brinell, depending on whether the indentor is a diamond or ball. And the pressure used can vary. Hence Rockwell B or Rockwell C. Zeus tables quote the loads and indentors used. So, the same metal hardness may be given different values, depending which method is used. Howard Edited By Howard Lewis on 22/08/2019 12:29:43 |
Chris TickTock | 22/08/2019 13:56:25 |
622 forum posts 46 photos | The question I would like answering is exactly what is the use for me as a home machinist in a hardness scale (lets assume we are referring to the Rockwell Scale). For example if a metal can be heat treated to a higher HRC is this of value in relation to another metal yielding less. At first this question seems simplistic but many factors could arise so its a question I would be interested in anyone answering as there's always something you don't know. Regards Chris |
SillyOldDuffer | 22/08/2019 14:30:36 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Ifs and buts off the scale on this question because there are so many variables. Roughly though, and with many overlaps, softest first: Lead
Hardness isn't the whole story. Though soft, pure aluminium is nasty to work with because it's sticky and highly likely to weld itself to a tool's cutting edge. Quenching steel for maximum hardness is rarely done because the process leaves the steel brittle to the point it can shatter like glass. Balancing Heat treatment for hardness versus toughness can be rather complicated. O1 (aka Gauge Plate) and W1 are favoured in workshops because they are easy to heat treat. O1 is designed to be quenched in oil, a slow process that strikes a good balance between hardness and toughness, as is needed in knife blades. W1 (aka silver steel) is designed to be quenched in water without cracking. The result is a bit harder for making drills, punches, and screw-taps, and it often benefits from being tempered (cooked in an oven) to reduce brittleness. The two alloys are similar. When buying metal look for mention of machinability in the description. Many alloys are tuned to make them more suitable for turning and drilling etc. and life is made easier by buying them. Ordinary mild-steel is neither awful nor nice to machine but it's well worth spending a little extra on EN1APb, aka EN1A Leaded, or 230M07PB. Most Brasses machine well, but the Bronzes can be a pig, especially Phosphor Bronze. Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 22/08/2019 14:31:02 |
Roderick Jenkins | 22/08/2019 14:38:25 |
![]() 2376 forum posts 800 photos | Chris, Your question is a little too complex for a simple answer because once a tool has been quenched to give its ultimate hardness it is usually tempered to give a compromise between hardness and toughness (resistance to fracture) suitable for the job in hand. If you are interested in this subject then I strongly recommend Tubal Cain's "Hardening, Tempering and Heat Treatment", No.1 in the Workshop Practice series. Just as a taster, TC quotes the "as quenched" hardness of silver steel at c.67 Rockwell C and High Speed steel as 65 HRc. Both are pretty brittle in this state. If you really get in to it then you can make Dave Lammas' Hardness tester, castings available from Blackgates! HTH, Rod |
not done it yet | 22/08/2019 14:45:06 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | Some metals have a range from fully annealed to (usually) so hard that it is too brittle for most uses. The only importance to the home machinist is (usually) the final hardness after tempering. That will always be a compromise between hardness and toughness with springiness somewhere in between for some items. One can get the final hardness on many metals but that does not mean they will be suitable for any particular job. Then there is the difference between surface- and through-hardness. The hobbyist needs to consider what heat treatment is appropriate - a very hard skin (case hardening) with a soft centre or hardness across the whole section. Rates of cooling (oil or water quenching will change that, too, as well as the cross section of the piece). Sooo, a simple table of hardness is likely not too appropriate for any or many jobs dependent on the metallurgy, the method used and the end properties required. Hobbyists generally keep it simple - industrial hardening, tempering, soaking at particular temperature(s), heating and cooling gradients, etc is a work of technical artistry! Your question should be, I think, more about which metal composition to choose before hardening and tempering, to a particular standard, and that may depend on your individual requirements for the end product. |
old mart | 22/08/2019 22:03:20 |
4655 forum posts 304 photos | Tungsten is very different from tungsten carbide. I have a small supply of tungsten alloy called Densimet. The 1/2" bars make very good boring bars for TC inserts and can be turned, milled, drilled and tapped. The relative density of the alloys runs about 18, and they have a higher Youngs modulus than steel. I also have a couple of plates of the stuff, 5/8" thick and about 10" by 4", which I have not thought of a use for yet, other than an excellent high inertia backing plate. |
Andrew Johnston | 22/08/2019 22:08:16 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by Christopher judd on 22/08/2019 13:56:25:
The question I would like answering is exactly what is the use for me as a home machinist in a hardness scale (lets assume we are referring to the Rockwell Scale). The exact answer is very little. All you really need to know is that some steels with a high carbon content (silver steel and gauge plate) can be made harder by heating, quenching and tempering. What the exact hardness number is on the Rockwell scale isn't critical. In a home workshop you're unlikely to be able to accurately measure it unless you're very well equipped. Even in the professional world it's not easy to get consistent results. And of course the scales are arbitrary, based upon the indentation of a specified anvil shape under a given load. We now wait for Rod to show us his hardness tester. Andrew |
Bob McDougall | 22/08/2019 23:11:26 |
54 forum posts 313 photos | Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 22/08/2019 14:30:36:
Ifs and buts off the scale on this question because there are so many variables. Roughly though, and with many overlaps, softest first: Lead
Hardness isn't the whole story. Though soft, pure aluminium is nasty to work with because it's sticky and highly likely to weld itself to a tool's cutting edge. Quenching steel for maximum hardness is rarely done because the process leaves the steel brittle to the point it can shatter like glass. Balancing Heat treatment for hardness versus toughness can be rather complicated. O1 (aka Gauge Plate) and W1 are favoured in workshops because they are easy to heat treat. O1 is designed to be quenched in oil, a slow process that strikes a good balance between hardness and toughness, as is needed in knife blades. W1 (aka silver steel) is designed to be quenched in water without cracking. The result is a bit harder for making drills, punches, and screw-taps, and it often benefits from being tempered (cooked in an oven) to reduce brittleness. The two alloys are similar. When buying metal look for mention of machinability in the description. Many alloys are tuned to make them more suitable for turning and drilling etc. and life is made easier by buying them. Ordinary mild-steel is neither awful nor nice to machine but it's well worth spending a little extra on EN1APb, aka EN1A Leaded, or 230M07PB. Most Brasses machine well, but the Bronzes can be a pig, especially Phosphor Bronze. Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 22/08/2019 14:31:02 I have been looking for a way to describe hardness to young engineers , we have Vickers, Rockwell, firth and brinell, I add mohs and shore. "The nice thing about standards is there are so many to chose from". |
not done it yet | 23/08/2019 07:14:42 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | Mhos is more useful as a geological scale, but is similar to hardness gauging using sets of standard files, I suppose. But still just a comparative scale - what will, or won’t, scratch what - likely more useful for choosing a surface preparation material within a polishing system. But who, in hobby model engineering, seeks out grinding paste or polishing compounds by using that scale? It is left to the suppliers to provide the correct grinding material and the correct sizes of particles (within each grade of paste) and carrier, for users to decide on how much they wish to spend - mostly dependent on speed of production. |
Chris TickTock | 23/08/2019 15:30:38 |
622 forum posts 46 photos | Hi Guys thanks for all the replies. My thoughts are ; I have only come across references to the Rockwell scale in terms of how hard it may be to machine or how hard it may become after heat treatment. Therefore it can be used as an indicator of hardness which does not mean in many cases the best suited material. Regards Chris |
pgk pgk | 24/08/2019 10:13:39 |
2661 forum posts 294 photos | Slightly off topic but does anyone else experience dipping a lead bell in liquid nitrogen then having it ring a clear resonant note? |
Andrew Johnston | 24/08/2019 10:59:42 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by Chris TickTock on 23/08/2019 15:30:38:
My thoughts are ; I have only come across references to the Rockwell scale in terms of how hard it may be to machine or how hard it may become after heat treatment. Along with other hardness scales the Rockwell scale simply gives an indication of hardness. It says nothing about machinability. With the right tooling it is easy to mill high speed steel toolbits (hard) but milling copper or pure aluminium (soft) is 'orrible. There are many different Rockwell scales. The most common is Rockwell C as it covers many steels and cutting tool materials. Brass and very soft steels might use the Rockwell B scale. The scale can be used on material in any state, soft, annealed, hardened, tempered and so on. Andrew |
Tim Stevens | 24/08/2019 11:50:44 |
![]() 1779 forum posts 1 photos | Itmay help to add a few basic facts: All common metals can exist in harder and softer forms, but with many of them the difference is not great. Changing from hard to soft can usually be done with heat - not enough to melt, and then allowed to cool fairly slowly. This is called 'annealing'. Lead is an odd one as its annealing temperature is lower than normal room temperature so it is always in the soft condition, unless, as pgk pgk has discovered, further cooling is taken seriously. Another exception is steel, in which the difference between hard and soft in the same alloy is greater than other metals, and in steel including a small % of carbon the range can be extreme. It all depends on the exact alloy, the possible addition of other metals to the alloy, and the heat treatment. So, your 'hardness table' is going to be complicated by each metal having a range of hardnesses, some with a much wider range of hardness than others. This probably explains why such tables are not readily found. I have found the book 'Machinery's Handbook' very useful in this regard. My edition (No 21, 1980) has 16 index references to Hardness, and 51 about Heat treatment of Steel. Don't look at the most recent versions, which will be expensive - the book has many editions back to about 1910. Hardness and what to do about it have always interested engineers. Hope this helps Tim Edited By Tim Stevens on 24/08/2019 11:51:11 |
not done it yet | 24/08/2019 14:04:40 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | ...and then allowed to cool slowly... Just watch out for the common exceptions. Copper is one - it matters not how - quickly or slowly - it is cooled. Hardening of copper is not really possible with heat - but it does work harden quite easily. |
Mike Poole | 24/08/2019 14:54:26 |
![]() 3676 forum posts 82 photos | Hi Chris, There are not many choices for cutting tools in the home workshop, Tungsten Carbide is probably the hardest but tends to chip easily, it is very resistant to high temperatures. HSS is readily available as square or round blanks to grind a tool of your choice, again it is supplied hardened and will still hold its edge at high temperature. High carbon steel can be supplied in a soft state like silver steel and gauge plate and fashioned into a tool and then hardened and tempered to your requirements and finish ground, excellent tools can be made but overheating will very quickly destroy the edge. Tungsten Carbide can be as simple as a brazed tip ground to a basic tool or as a preformed tip with a wide variety of shapes and characteristics, HSS has a number of different flavours to choose from. High carbon steel is available as mentioned and also various other hardenable tool steel alloys are available. The absolute hardness is only part of the story for making tools, toughness of a tool can be desirable and with High carbon steel the tempering process trades some hardness for increased toughness. A Tungsten Carbide tool will machine a HSS tool even in its hard state. Unfortunately Tungsten Carbide needs special grinding wheels as it is harder than Aluminium Oxide and silicon carbide, you will need a green grit wheel or diamond wheel which is probably one of the reasons to use preformed tipped tooling. The absolute value of the materials hardness is interesting but as long as the tool is harder than the material you wish to cut then all should be well. Mike |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.