By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Bantam Chuck

Measurments

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Alan .20419/08/2015 18:59:36
304 forum posts
14 photos

Hi chaps been away for a while but hopefully I will be getting into things a bit more now, I have been given a brand new 10inch for jaw for my bantam lath but I now need to make a back plate to fit it to the lathe, I have access to a CNC mill to drill the three holes, I was wondering if any one might know the PCD for the holes to be drilled, any advice would be helpful.

Regards Alan.

Chris Gunn19/08/2015 20:30:08
459 forum posts
28 photos

Alan, you will need to create a D1-3 mount to fit your chuck, which is on the big side for a Bantam, so you will need the locking pins as well as drilling the holes, do you have these?

Have you considered buying a D1-3 back plate available from "our" suppliers and fitting the chuck to that?

A lot would depend on the configuration of the holes and the register in the back of your chuck, and the size of the commercially available plates.

Chris Gunn

John Stevenson19/08/2015 20:35:51
avatar
5068 forum posts
3 photos

10" is far too big for a Bantam or anything on D1-3.

I used to have am 8" TOS chuck on the CVA and that is as big as makes it happy.

Without measuring on a 10" chuck you could get the jaws fouling the bed when they are extended.

Nick_G19/08/2015 20:49:32
avatar
1808 forum posts
744 photos

.

I have a Boxford with a D1-3 mounting. I 'think' the Bantam is in a similar capacity bracket.

Mine will swing (at max) about 10.5" so a 10" chuck would be the size of a faceplate. Nice to have been given it but I would say not useable for you on that machine.

Nick

Nigel McBurney 119/08/2015 22:41:11
avatar
1101 forum posts
3 photos

I have a Colchester Master with a 10 inch 4 jaw D1-4 direct fitting and thus no backplate,this is a big heavy chuck, The Bantam is far too small for a 10 inch chuck, the holding capacity of the chuck would be limited as the jaws could not be fully extended without hitting the bed ways, also the backplate would extend the chuck further from the bearings by at least 3/4 of an inch,putting more strain on the bearings and spindle,when holding an odd shaped workpiece the out of balance caused by the work and the relatively heavy jaws would cause the lathe to rock about,forget it and swap your 10 inch for an 8 inch chuck.

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate