JasonB | 27/10/2022 07:15:43 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | The engine in question was in ME (1935) so later than the book therfore is not included. Some of Muncaster's designs were little more than a GA and a couple of sections and I think this would be one of those engines rather than something like his Grasshopper that ran into about 20 pages or others that had fold out plans that would have allowed a couple more pages for details, though again possibly not fully detailed part by part. He does show some general details such as bearing pedestals, big end details etc that could be applied to a number of the designs. A GA and a paragraph is enough for some people
|
Michael Gilligan | 27/10/2022 07:53:08 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by JasonB on 27/10/2022 07:15:43:
[…] A GA and a paragraph is enough for some people . For some aspects that is clearly true, Jason … and you deserve enormous praise for what you do. But … ‘reverse engineering’ what might originally have been a designer's fudge in a visually-appealing model is a different matter; and Paul’s concern will remain unresolved. What Westbury wrote doesn’t help the modern reader very much: [quote] In the particular type of parallel motion illustrated, the geometry is simple and obvious; it was used on many types of engines, both horizontal and vertical, though in the latter case the ends of the radius rods were more often anchored from brackets fixed to the walls of the engine house than from columns; … [/quote] … as we can see from the inconclusive discussion on this thread; whilst the geometry appears simple and obvious, it is actually neither. MichaelG. |
Michael Gilligan | 27/10/2022 09:32:23 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | This is a good introduction to the analysis of straight-line mechanisms: . Edited By Michael Gilligan on 27/10/2022 09:48:03 |
Michael Gilligan | 27/10/2022 19:56:33 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Unfortunately … It appears that ForceEffect Motion has been ‘retired’ for several years MichaelG. . Edit: __ This, however, looks very promising: https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/motiongen/id1065657088 Ref. __ https://motiongen.io/resources Another Edit: __ or at least it looked very promising until I visited that ‘resources’ page, which behaves badly. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 27/10/2022 20:14:18 |
Michael Gilligan | 27/10/2022 20:24:37 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | |
Hopper | 28/10/2022 09:38:19 |
![]() 7881 forum posts 397 photos | Posted by JasonB on 27/10/2022 07:15:43:
The engine in question was in ME (1935) so later than the book therfore is not included. Some of Muncaster's designs were little more than a GA and a couple of sections and I think this would be one of those engines rather than something like his Grasshopper that ran into about 20 pages or others that had fold out plans that would have allowed a couple more pages for details, though again possibly not fully detailed part by part. He does show some general details such as bearing pedestals, big end details etc that could be applied to a number of the designs. A GA and a paragraph is enough for some people
Yes that looks like the engine in the copy of the 1912 book I have. No linkages in sight sadly. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.