I can't find the arm weight I should be using
SillyOldDuffer | 01/05/2022 10:01:43 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by Clive Foster on 30/04/2022 17:05:02:
Getting back to the original question there seems little doubt that the best solution is an adjustable hydraulic damper set-up allowing the rate of fall to be set to obtain a suitable cutting pressure on the blade. ...Clive Yes, but although an adjustable damper might provide more control than a spring, it doesn't answer Andrew's original question - what's the optimum pressure? A number of posts point to there being a wide range of acceptable settings that depend on variables like:
All these effect the feed-rate, and I suggest are only worth fussing with if the saw spends most of it's time on the same job. The saw In my workshop cuts something different every time. So I usually run it at the same setting no matter what. It's set to suit mild-steel, and I've only changed it a couple of times, both when a lot of Aluminium had to be cut. Otherwise, I don't bother. Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 01/05/2022 10:03:27 |
martin haysom | 01/05/2022 11:41:24 |
![]() 165 forum posts | with so many variables i doubt that the optimum pressure is obtainable with any machine to be found in our type of workshop. mine is not even adjustable and is never a problem. i just put the job in the saw walk away and do something else. |
Clive Foster | 01/05/2022 13:13:32 |
3630 forum posts 128 photos | SillyOldDuffer As martin says the variety of jobs and materials we see make it a practical impossibility to define an optimum pressure let alone actually set the saw to give it. Generally not so much down pressure that the blade gets upset or so little that cutting takes "forever" has to do. Plus knowing when a little hand assistance either way is needful. Certainly that was the way I used mine in the days before the Rapidor power hacksaw took over the bulk of the stock cutting work. Whatever the designers intent the standard spring pressure adjuster is impossibly cumbersome beyond finding and holding a general purpose position that can be used for "most" jobs. There were a few things that I had to accept that mine could not be made to safely cut. Such as thin wall tube. In contrast hydraulic systems are easily adjustable. So, given appropriate calibration on the adjuster valve, it is little trouble to change settings when changing materials. Obviously it takes a bit of experimentation and note taking to evolve a list that suits your saw and your work. But once its done changing the setting is no harder than changing feed-rate on a QC gearbox equipped lathe. Just like feed rate, choosing from a couple or three settings will do well enough for most jobs but sometimes you need to be more optimal to avoid stripping the teeth from the blade or ending up with a wandering cut. Optimum is an impossible dream for us but usefully better than an "it will have to do" general purpose setting for jobs when that isn't really appropriate seems quite realistic. Its usually fairly obvious when the saw is seriously struggling making a swift adjustment desirable. According to the professionals getting close to an optimum blade pressure / downfeed rate vastly increases blade life. Certainly when I got mine I ran through several blades quite quickly due to a combination of the down pressure being way too high and the impossibility of correctly adjusting the blade guides correctly. But mine was an early version, got maybe 45 years ago, so the manufacturing standards and quality of blades in the box were much poorer than todays offerings. Clive |
Peter Greene | 05/05/2022 01:55:30 |
865 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 01/05/2022 05:27:13:
Posted by Peter Greene 🇨🇦 on 01/05/2022 02:00:00: . IIRC there was an even earlier one way back when the website lady explained that keyboard wizzes in other forums here needed to be able to to enter smilies etc using keystrokes only. For that reason the site was configured to allow it (rather than turning off that option) resulting in the rest of us generating inadvertent smilies. . That’s not quite how I remember the ‘explanation’ Peter … but as I couldn’t easily locate that particular thread, I decided to just illustrate the ‘mechanics’ for Nick. If you can find the actual quote, do please post a link pro bono publico
Not the actual quote unfortunately, Michael, but I do have a record of posting this (in another guise) to the forum back in 2014: "According to a PM conversation I had with the web-maintenance lady (Katie?) some time ago, .............Apparently, the editor can be configured so that smileys can only be added via the drop-down (thus solving the problem of, for example, quote followed by parenthesis). However users in some other forums here are deathly afraid of mice (presumably they leap up on chairs when they see one). To accommodate them, the editor is configured to insert smileys the old-fashioned way (via keyboard characters) in addition the the drop-down."
(Perhaps what I'm remembering is not an actual thread but an offline conversation). Edited By Peter Greene 🇨🇦 on 05/05/2022 01:57:48 |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.