By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Silver soldering contradiction

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Michael Gilligan13/04/2018 08:37:57
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by BDH on 13/04/2018 08:24:32:

KH mentions something that many people are unaware of, namely that the silver solder should be fed in one side and observed to appear at the other side. This shows that the solder has penetrated the joint.

.

Or [alternatively, and perhaps more typically for small jobs] the solder is included within the joint area, either as 'paillons' or as rings of wire ... and the flow comes out to the edge.

MichaelG.

Hopper13/04/2018 08:47:42
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 13/04/2018 08:13:08:

I think the problem with this topic might be that people are using common words like 'gap' and 'layer' without necessarily meaning the exact same thing as the next man.

Therein lies the problem, quite likely.

If you beat or press a domed/flanged boiler end out of flat copper plate and make it a tight fit in the piece of copper pipe that forms the main boiler shell, does that mean it's a "no gap" fit? Or does it mean the end piece is a tight fit on the three points around the OD that are in contact with the ID of the copper pipe and there is possibly a one or two thou gap throughout the rest of the joint?

To mate two pieces of metal together with gaps of less than a thou or so often requires engineers' blue, scrapers, surface plates and the like. Would bits of copper sheeting and pipe as formed stand up as "no gap" fits if checked with engineers blue etc to a similar standard?

And if you prep the copper surfaces with emery paper, do the myriad surface scratches created constitute a "gap", being they could be a thou deep in each of the two pieces?

 

Edited By Hopper on 13/04/2018 08:48:20

Edited By Hopper on 13/04/2018 08:48:59

Bob Stevenson13/04/2018 15:36:50
579 forum posts
7 photos

The danger now with this topic is that people who are new to silver soldering will read this and assume that they are obliged to make provision for a 'gap' when preparing parts to allow for the solder ....In actual working practice one can forget about the 'gap' when making up parts and components by hand methods (and most machining too) as there is every chance that solder WILL flow into joints...and the solder WILL NOT fill any gaps.....

 

Again;..parts must be a good close fit......the parts MUST be clean of impurities.........the joint MUST be hot enough (red, 'glowing' before solder is applied.

 

BEWARE of;....impurities in fuel or torch that spoil cleanliness before temperature is reached......lack of heat due to poor torch choice, poor heating technique......touching the parts with bare hands after cleaning........not dissolving flux, such as Borax, sufficiently before application so that the undisssolved 'grains' can't run into the joint.

Edited By Bob Stevenson on 13/04/2018 15:41:13

Michael Gilligan13/04/2018 16:56:07
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Bob Stevenson on 13/04/2018 15:36:50:

The danger now with this topic is that people who are new to silver soldering will read this and assume that they are obliged to make provision for a 'gap' ...

.

Sorry, Bob ... I must beg to differ !!

If those people actually READ what has been written, I think they will be able to make a reasonably well-informed judgement.

MichaelG.

Sam Stones13/04/2018 20:08:27
avatar
922 forum posts
332 photos

Sam,

Did you read the piece that I quoted from, earlier ?

MichaelG.

Guilty as charged, Michaelcrying

I knew I read it somewhere.angry

Is this what happens when we get old?

Keep smiling,

Sam

Michael Gilligan13/04/2018 20:46:03
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Sam Stones on 13/04/2018 20:08:27:

I knew I read it somewhere.angry

Is this what happens when we get old?

.

You're doing fine, Sam yes

MichaelG.

vintagengineer14/04/2018 10:44:14
avatar
469 forum posts
6 photos

This is what I would use if using filler rod.

Tight fit Negligible clearances which can be assembled or disassembled by hand - e.g. hubs,

gears, pulleys, bushings, frequently removed bearings

H7/j6
Sam Stones14/04/2018 20:34:16
avatar
922 forum posts
332 photos

For a butt joint, I would interpret that to mean lightly clamped, VE !? cheeky

Does this help those who have never seen or heard of H7/j6 ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_tolerance 

'Go to the back of the class, Sam!"

 

Edited By Sam Stones on 14/04/2018 20:37:26

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate