Probably the start of a very long thread...
Dr_GMJN | 07/05/2020 19:50:23 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | Posted by JasonB on 07/05/2020 19:20:16:
Not of you are going at it with carbide and going buy the recent comments you may not have much to come off anyway.
OK How do you mean about not having much to come off - beacuse of the relatively thin sections? Thanks.
|
JasonB | 07/05/2020 20:07:14 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | There is not much of a machining allowance on some of the surfaces so you will be doing little more than skimming the surface. The thin sections throw up their own issues with the possibility of being chilled as the small parts, corners and edges cool rapidly and form a hard iron but carbide usually copes with that, at least for the initial milling if not drilling and tapping near corners. |
Dr_GMJN | 07/05/2020 22:48:49 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | Posted by JasonB on 07/05/2020 20:07:14:
There is not much of a machining allowance on some of the surfaces so you will be doing little more than skimming the surface. The thin sections throw up their own issues with the possibility of being chilled as the small parts, corners and edges cool rapidly and form a hard iron but carbide usually copes with that, at least for the initial milling if not drilling and tapping near corners. I see, thanks. I made the second clamp this evening. Somehow it took me twice as long, had the same issues, but as a bonus, I made a mistake on measurement, so one of the overhangs is 1mm too long. Onwards... |
Ron Laden | 08/05/2020 09:58:40 |
![]() 2320 forum posts 452 photos | Well I had a pleasant surprise, reading above the tramming of the SX2P I thought I would check mine as is quite some time since I did it last and the mill has done a lot of work since. Y reading across table edge to edge 5.5" = 0.0002" X reading across 4.2." each side of table centre = 0.0008". I don't think I will complain about those readings. GMJN, one tool I would recommend for your SX2 is the ARC 25mm 2 insert end mill. It takes coated inserts for steel and uncoated for alu etc, it really is excellent I use mine all the time on parts large and small. Great for facing and reducing thickness and the finish it leaves is excellent. Its about the perfect size for the SX2 and the mill doesn't have any issues driving it, very good price to. Ron Edited By Ron Laden on 08/05/2020 10:04:47 |
Dr_GMJN | 08/05/2020 10:35:53 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | Posted by Ron Laden on 08/05/2020 09:58:40:
Well I had a pleasant surprise, reading above the tramming of the SX2P I thought I would check mine as is quite some time since I did it last and the mill has done a lot of work since. Y reading across table edge to edge 5.5" = 0.0002" X reading across 4.2." each side of table centre = 0.0008". I don't think I will complain about those readings. GMJN, one tool I would recommend for your SX2 is the ARC 25mm 2 insert end mill. It takes coated inserts for steel and uncoated for alu etc, it really is excellent I use mine all the time on parts large and small. Great for facing and reducing thickness and the finish it leaves is excellent. Its about the perfect size for the SX2 and the mill doesn't have any issues driving it, very good price to. Ron Edited By Ron Laden on 08/05/2020 10:04:47 Thanks Ron - did you try moving the head with your hand while checking the tramming? I'd be interested to see what your thoughts are on any deflections you might get? I'm getting a list together for an Arc Euro order. I will look at the end mill you suggest. In terms of Fly cutters, I'm thinking of getting this one (when it's in stock again), and using my Sandvik 8mm left hand tool holder with it: https://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Cutting-Tools/Fly-Cutters/Fly-Cutter-Holders-Taper-Shank Any comments? Thanks.
ETA do you mean this one in R8? https://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Cutting-Tools/Indexable-Carbide-End-Mills/90-Indexable-Carbide-End-Mills Edited By Dr_GMJN on 08/05/2020 10:40:47 |
Martin Connelly | 08/05/2020 10:43:58 |
![]() 2549 forum posts 235 photos | Not so much a comment as a suggestion. There is a thread for practicing posting in. If you have got a web page copied to the clipboard to paste in a thread then use the link icon to create an active link. It is the one that looks like three chain links with a globe behind them. You can paste your link and give it a suitable description. Martin C Link added Edited By Martin Connelly on 08/05/2020 11:12:37 |
JasonB | 08/05/2020 11:21:11 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | On the subject of fly cutters I tend to use my smaller ones similar to the plain shank set of 3 that ARC do and the taper shank one gets used once in a blue moon. Easily held in an ER or R8 collet |
Dr_GMJN | 08/05/2020 11:22:49 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | Posted by Martin Connelly on 08/05/2020 10:43:58:
Not so much a comment as a suggestion. There is a thread for practicing posting in. If you have got a web page copied to the clipboard to paste in a thread then use the link icon to create an active link. It is the one that looks like three chain links with a globe behind them. You can paste your link and give it a suitable description. Martin C Link added Edited By Martin Connelly on 08/05/2020 11:12:37 Thanks Martin, I would edit the post, but the edit button's disappeared. Hmm, it's on this post. Do we only get one chance to edit a post or something? Edited By Dr_GMJN on 08/05/2020 11:25:24 |
Dr_GMJN | 08/05/2020 11:28:12 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | Posted by JasonB on 08/05/2020 11:21:11:
On the subject of fly cutters I tend to use my smaller ones similar to the plain shank set of 3 that ARC do and the taper shank one gets used once in a blue moon. Easily held in an ER or R8 collet
Wouldn't the R8 version gain me some a bit more stiffness, or would you consider it too large a diameter (it's 63.5mm vs. 35mm for the plain shank version)? |
Ketan Swali | 08/05/2020 11:33:40 |
1481 forum posts 149 photos | ETA do you mean this one in R8? https://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Cutting-Tools/Indexable-Carbide-End-Mills/90-Indexable-Carbide-End-Mills Edited By Dr_GMJN on 08/05/2020 10:40:47 Yes, Ron meant this one 060-282-00258 Ketan at ARC. |
Ron Laden | 08/05/2020 12:00:49 |
![]() 2320 forum posts 452 photos | Posted by Ketan Swali on 08/05/2020 11:33:40:
ETA do you mean this one in R8? https://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Cutting-Tools/Indexable-Carbide-End-Mills/90-Indexable-Carbide-End-Mills Edited By Dr_GMJN on 08/05/2020 10:40:47 Yes, Ron meant this one 060-282-00258 Ketan at ARC. Yes sorry, its the R8 one Ketan added a link for above. Ron
|
JasonB | 08/05/2020 13:14:09 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | For that size of work I think the R8 may be a bit large, infact the most used one of the three I have is 30mm and I use that with a 6mm HSS bit set to swing just over 50mm dia. Rigidity wise I doubt there is much in it with the larger cutting radius cancelling out the more solid R8 body/shank, with the smaller radius you can also run the spindle at a higher speed for the same cutting speed at the tip which helps keep the motor in it's power band and |
Ron Laden | 09/05/2020 07:26:10 |
![]() 2320 forum posts 452 photos | Posted by Dr_GMJN on 08/05/2020 10:35:53:
Posted by Ron Laden on 08/05/2020 09:58:40:
Well I had a pleasant surprise, reading above the tramming of the SX2P I thought I would check mine as is quite some time since I did it last and the mill has done a lot of work since. Y reading across table edge to edge 5.5" = 0.0002" X reading across 4.2." each side of table centre = 0.0008". I don't think I will complain about those readings. GMJN, one tool I would recommend for your SX2 is the ARC 25mm 2 insert end mill. It takes coated inserts for steel and uncoated for alu etc, it really is excellent I use mine all the time on parts large and small. Great for facing and reducing thickness and the finish it leaves is excellent. Its about the perfect size for the SX2 and the mill doesn't have any issues driving it, very good price to. Ron Edited By Ron Laden on 08/05/2020 10:04:47 Thanks Ron - did you try moving the head with your hand while checking the tramming? I'd be interested to see what your thoughts are on any deflections you might get?
No I didn't try moving the head so to answer your question I set the DTI up, centered the table and measured 100mm each side of centre in X. Pressing hard down on each end of the table I had movement of 0.0012" one side and 0.0015" on the other. I then centered the DTI on the front edge of the table and whilst pressing down on the table I pushed the top of the head back as hard as I was comfortable with. The reading lifted 0.0025" and it was similar dropping 0.0027" when I pulled the head. I expected there would be movement as it is a small hobby mill but it was better than I thought it would be. Am I worried about it? not at all the machine produces parts to the dimensions I am aiming for and gives a good finish. Your machine is now trammed just use it, with some half decent tooling it will be fine.. Ron
|
Dr_GMJN | 09/05/2020 21:14:34 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | Posted by Ron Laden on 09/05/2020 07:26:10:
Posted by Dr_GMJN on 08/05/2020 10:35:53:
Posted by Ron Laden on 08/05/2020 09:58:40:
Well I had a pleasant surprise, reading above the tramming of the SX2P I thought I would check mine as is quite some time since I did it last and the mill has done a lot of work since. Y reading across table edge to edge 5.5" = 0.0002" X reading across 4.2." each side of table centre = 0.0008". I don't think I will complain about those readings. GMJN, one tool I would recommend for your SX2 is the ARC 25mm 2 insert end mill. It takes coated inserts for steel and uncoated for alu etc, it really is excellent I use mine all the time on parts large and small. Great for facing and reducing thickness and the finish it leaves is excellent. Its about the perfect size for the SX2 and the mill doesn't have any issues driving it, very good price to. Ron Edited By Ron Laden on 08/05/2020 10:04:47 Thanks Ron - did you try moving the head with your hand while checking the tramming? I'd be interested to see what your thoughts are on any deflections you might get?
No I didn't try moving the head so to answer your question I set the DTI up, centered the table and measured 100mm each side of centre in X. Pressing hard down on each end of the table I had movement of 0.0012" one side and 0.0015" on the other. I then centered the DTI on the front edge of the table and whilst pressing down on the table I pushed the top of the head back as hard as I was comfortable with. The reading lifted 0.0025" and it was similar dropping 0.0027" when I pulled the head. I expected there would be movement as it is a small hobby mill but it was better than I thought it would be. Am I worried about it? not at all the machine produces parts to the dimensions I am aiming for and gives a good finish. Your machine is now trammed just use it, with some half decent tooling it will be fine.. Ron
Thanks Ron, much appreciated. Yes, tomorrow is D-Day in terms of making a start. And make a start I will, although maybe only some preparation on the box base. I am waiting for delivery of a fly cutter and some new end mills (ass suggested by folks on here) so I'm starting from a known baseline in terms of tooling. Once I'm happy using those, I'll make a start on the machining.
|
Dr_GMJN | 11/05/2020 14:02:43 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | Ok another one: |
Andrew Johnston | 11/05/2020 14:41:01 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Assuming it's not a cheapo cutter there are a couple of possible reasons: 1. Too slow a feedrate, with shallow depths of cut you can really ramp up the feedrate, search for chip thinning to see why. With a 4-flute cutter I'd be feeding at more than 500mm/min assuming the cutter is carbide and is running at 2000rpm. 2. Climb ,milling will generally give a better finish, especially in sticky materials like some low carbon steels, in particular EN3B. Andrew |
John Haine | 11/05/2020 15:06:08 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | But with your mill, climb milling might be a tad courageous unless you have the gibs very tight. Problem is that the cutter force pulls the work into the cutter if there is any backlash in the leadscrew so the cutting depth suddenly gets much bigger. Common practice with cnc and if you have ballscrews, but not so common with a manual mill with conventional screws. |
Andrew Johnston | 11/05/2020 15:32:10 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by John Haine on 11/05/2020 15:06:08:
.................but not so common with a manual mill with conventional screws. Oh dear, and I've just done it on some hot rolled plate. Andrew |
Dr_GMJN | 11/05/2020 15:37:07 |
![]() 1602 forum posts | The cutter is a Sandvik 12mm slot drill, used only a couple of times on aluminium. Regarding feed rate - I tried slow, and fast - fast like I was in in a comedy film. Same result. No way I'd try climb milling on my machine - I did it once by accident, but wont be doing it again - the backlash in the leadscrews is terrible even after adjustment. |
Andrew Johnston | 11/05/2020 16:20:27 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by Dr_GMJN on 11/05/2020 15:37:07:
No way I'd try climb milling on my machine............... Better learn to draw file then. Andrew |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.