Here is a list of all the postings Brian G has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: DraftSight no longer free |
27/03/2019 17:43:11 |
Posted by duncan webster on 27/03/2019 16:57:50:
... If I keep looking I might find a similar feature in QCAD, at the moment I have to do 2 menu clicks, one to select the line menu, 2nd to say what type of line...
I just bought the e-book as well as the software. There is a preview here. It looks like good value, and easier for me than a printed copy as I normally keep one monitor free for documents. One of the first things I found is that a 2-point line can be started by typing LI. There are plenty of others such as LH for a horizontal line. I'll let you guess the command line for a vertical line Brian |
Thread: Sieg C6 / SC6 Spindle Nose and Arc Euro Trade Chucks |
26/03/2019 15:51:11 |
Thanks Neil I asked this morning but they don't have the information. Unless anybody with a C6 reads this he will have to make his own backplate. Brian EDIT: Even without a positive result, getting a same-day reply from a supplier has to count as good service. Edited By Brian G on 26/03/2019 15:52:16 |
Thread: DraftSight no longer free |
26/03/2019 11:54:57 |
Posted by Brian G on 26/03/2019 10:15:41:
... EUR 33 + VAT for a lifetime licence and a year's updates. Even if I buy a new version every three years, it would still only cost 1/3 as much as Draftsight... Brian I would REALLY like to claim that 33/(3 x 99) = 1/3 was a deliberate mistake and not the reason I rely on CAD and Excel so much Brian |
26/03/2019 10:15:41 |
I will put AutoCAD R14 on hold for a bit as Longbow doesn't work on dongled versions, and I am not that keen on going back too far on Windows. I have just used ODA File Converter (formerly Teigha) to convert everything to DXF (remarkably simple as it does a complete folder as a batch job) so I can guarantee access to them whatever I do. Having done some testing, QCAD free opens the DXF files with a few linetype issues, but FreeCAD doesn't seem to handle the dimensions and text. QCAD Professional will open and save DWG, so I'm about to bite the bullet and pay EUR 33 + VAT for a lifetime licence and a year's updates. Even if I buy a new version every three years, it would still only cost 1/3 as much as Draftsight. Brian |
Thread: Sieg C6 / SC6 Spindle Nose and Arc Euro Trade Chucks |
25/03/2019 19:37:12 |
My son wants to buy one of the self-centring 4-jaw 125mm chucks from Arc and as his new Chester uses the same mounting system (A rotating collar and 3 plug bolts) he wondered if he could use (or adapt) the Arc Backplate? The Chester has a 50mm spindle nose and three 20mm holes on a 75mm P.C.D. Does anybody know if the C6/SC6 dimensions are the same? Thanks Brian |
Thread: DraftSight no longer free |
25/03/2019 17:21:53 |
Looks like I will have to hurry up and convert all my drawings back to AutoCAD R14. I'm pretty sure I can dig out my dongle and a spare XP licence to run it on. Brian |
Thread: Milling curves |
22/03/2019 08:29:22 |
Posted by Roy Garden on 21/03/2019 23:38:16:
Edited By Roy Garden on 21/03/2019 23:42:20 I must admit to thinking that there would be dozens of YouTube videos, but perhaps they are just too basic a technology. There is a thread elsewhere on this forum, but to be honest I have no idea where I saw the idea of using ballraces, but they are just used as a shortcut to avoid the need to turn, harden and temper buttons, not rolling like on a filing rest. Brian |
Thread: 45mm Narrow gauge locomotive drawings |
21/03/2019 19:21:41 |
There are drawings available through the 16mm association, either on the website (2' gauge unless you scale up to 7/8" which is now a popular option) or by buying back numbers of 16mm today (which has a number of dual gauge designs). Brian |
Thread: Milling curves |
21/03/2019 08:15:35 |
Posted by Plasma on 21/03/2019 07:36:19:
What is the material and how thick is it? If you're abilities are not enough to file a workpiece into a curve I wonder at how you would go about setting up to mill the workpiece. ... Rather than buying a rotary table before you are certain which one you want (I made that mistake and haven't actually needed to use mine yet as for many jobs a file is quicker), you might be able to make filing it easier. After spending hundreds on machines, it was quite disheartening to realise that hand tools can be less work. Perhaps take off most of the metal with a couple of angled cuts, either on the mill or more easily with a hacksaw (where you don't have to do mulitple set-ups or worse still reset a rotating vice to straight) and then file it between a couple of steel buttons. If you can't harden them put layout fluid or Sharpie on them and try not to file it off. If there is a hole, bolt them through (which would let you use cheap ballraces as buttons) otherwise clamp them. Brian EDIT: If you do go down the motorised table route, take a look at Arduino Rotary Table for Dummies on HMEM. The whole project costs less (much less if you use an Arduino clone) than a set of division disks for a rotary table, and assembling the electronics was a fun introduction to Arduinos. I might even get around to fitting it to my rotary table one day should I need it... (EDIT2: If I can find it that is, I have a horrible feeling I nicked all the components for other projects, Arduinos are seriously addictive). Edited By Brian G on 21/03/2019 08:21:54 Edited By Brian G on 21/03/2019 08:24:20 |
Thread: I want one! |
19/03/2019 17:12:41 |
Video on the BBC **LINK** Brace yourself for a Disney moment Brian |
Thread: Microsoft Word |
19/03/2019 07:43:21 |
To be fair, Microsoft offer a free compatibility pack for earlier versions of Office software, and there are plenty of free online file converters (although with many .docx and .xlsx files all you need to do is change the file extension to .doc or .xls to open in earlier versions). I wonder, does everybody who objects to the fact that Microsoft's (and for that matter Adobe's and Autodesk's,) proprietary standards are becoming the de facto standards for documents refuse on principle to use Morse, Jacobs and R8 tapers, Brown and Sharpe cutters or ER collets? Brian |
Thread: Windows Update (Again) |
17/03/2019 08:37:23 |
Posted by Hopper on 17/03/2019 08:12:01:
... Surprising as my laptop is ancient, at least six years old. Ancient? My Acer 7720G was Brian EDIT: I evidently can't do subtraction. Edited By Brian G on 17/03/2019 08:39:10 |
Thread: Why do both power hacksaws and bandsaws exist? |
17/03/2019 08:19:34 |
Posted by John Haine on 17/03/2019 08:11:28:
Apart from kits, does anyone make a commercial powered hacksaw nowadays? I suspect the answer to the question is that power hacksaws are left overs. Seig still list one: **LINK** . I would imagine that in many countries being able to use standard hacksaw blades is quite useful. Brian |
17/03/2019 07:06:14 |
Cooling may be worth considering. After each tooth of the bandsaw passes through the metal it has plenty of time to cool before re-entering as perhaps 90% of the blade is shedding heat. In contrast a hacksaw blade spends its return stroke passing through the bar it is cutting and only gets a short time at each end of the stroke to cool. Having said that, I certainly don't have room (or the need) for either a bandsaw or a full-size donkey saw, so a compact powered hacksaw is more attractive. (I have Myfordboy's drawings and a spare motor, but need to get a round tuit, until then the cold saw or a "manumatic" hacksaw will have to do). Brian |
Thread: Aluminium Firebox |
15/03/2019 08:21:39 |
Posted by Nigel Graham 2 on 14/03/2019 21:12:22:
... This point is also pertinent to anyone building miniature railways with aluminium rail. It may seem best to use stainless-steel fastenings and I know some have done this. However, whilst they are good with mild-steel, the combination risks aluminium-alloy rail-ends corroding rapidly, leaving the stainless-steel screws all smugly bright and shiny....
I once received a phone call from an aeronautical engineer complaining about our supplying him with an aluminium greenhouse equipped with galvanised and stainless steel fittings. I agreed that there should be electrolytic corrosion, but that I had never encountered it in 20 years, and that I had seen 30+ year old buildings without any problems. The only reason I could think of was that the 6063 aluminium formed an oxide skin before this happened. Are there any metallurgists out there that can come up with a better explanation? Brian |
14/03/2019 17:19:53 |
Yes Bill, it is in book 1. Brian Edit: Not as bad as some authors, at least both books are still available. My pet hate is "full details are in my earlier (out of print, hard to find and frighteningly expensive) book" (or article in the case of LBSC!). Edited By Brian G on 14/03/2019 17:23:17 |
14/03/2019 17:03:03 |
Hi Bill He explains why in chapter one of Building Simple Model Steam Engines: "I don't recommend the use of galvanised or zinc-coated steel, as the coating will react with any adjacent copper or brass and cause corrosion. The same applies to aluminium." Brian
|
Thread: Firehole ring |
12/03/2019 15:11:12 |
Posted by Packmule on 12/03/2019 13:52:37:
It was Phosphor Bronze. Heated till red hot.
Edited By Packmule on 12/03/2019 13:53:12 This thread "Bending Cast Gunmetal" suggests that bronzes don't like being hot worked **LINK** Brian |
Thread: Is this a bad idea...? |
12/03/2019 13:35:00 |
If I understand correctly, the dog clutch doesn't have to be on the spindle to allow re-engagement in the thread, but it does have to have a 1:1 relationship with the spindle and a constant relationship to the leadscrew and one of these wouldn't happen if the tumble reverse is used to disconnect the drive. In this design which takes advantage of the output gear from the tumble reverse having the same tooth count as the bull gear, the clutch is mounted after the tumble reverse which has to stay engaged to maintain its relationship to the spindle. www.gadgetbuilder.com/Dog_Clutch.html . Brian EDIT: .com not ,com <FACEPALM> Edited By Brian G on 12/03/2019 13:36:06 |
Thread: Scrollsaw for the occasional user |
11/03/2019 12:05:00 |
Posted by Bazyle on 11/03/2019 11:39:18:
The main market for them is for wood cutting so the speeds for cheap ones are relatively high which burns out a blade on metal very quickly. The other problem is small movement so only a few mm of blade is being used but this is necessary because they don't move the blade vertically but just waggle the whole frame about a single pivot. Some try for a pivot on each arm and a parallel motion but it's still not the equivalent of a hand operation. Seems like time for a MEW design for a steady long stroke machine. A proper vertical motion could double as a filing machine. It looks as if the Hemingway kit comes close to the ideal apart from its limited cutting width. Brian Edit: And it would be less expensive than selling my fretsaw and buying a better one - I'll have to think about that. Edited By Brian G on 11/03/2019 12:06:27 |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.