By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more

Member postings for Steve355

Here is a list of all the postings Steve355 has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.

Thread: Surface grinder reassembly
31/07/2022 09:59:31

So, after a bit more playing with it this morning, a couple of things are apparent.

The clock needle vibrates slightly as is moved left to right, as I suspected, seems like the rack and pinion are meshing too much, or the gibs on the work table are not stable enough.

It all looks nice and stable as I move the table left to right, +/- 0.00025 until it gets to about 3/4 movement then it falls off the cliff of about 0.003. BUT when I move the table back leftwards it does not return to zero. This to me seems like the Z axis is not stable and I need to concentrate on that. When the table is at one end the weight of the table is moving the Z axis. Im pretty sure I can see it moving slightly. So back to basics, get the Z axis stable and tracking correctly, followed by Y, followed by X.

Anyone got any better ideas? Skip not ordered yet.

Edited By Steve355 on 31/07/2022 10:02:06

31/07/2022 08:58:14

Hi all

Tony - interesting you are doing a similar project at a similar time!

I got it running for the first time yesterday and overall was pleased with the finish result, considering I hadn’t yet dressed the wheel or even really done any adjustment other than tightening it all up. There were some very light marks on the finish that looked to me might be caused by the ratchet mechanism for the table - something worn must be causing that.

I put a clock on the table and it showed 0.0005-0.001 deviation across most of its length left to right, but headed off a cliff (!) of a few thou at the right hand end. Clearly that needs to be looked into.

Interestingly I discovered that This Old Tony’s surface grinder refurb video on YouTube is him restoring a Capco grinder. I didn’t even know they had them over there. He identifies all the areas of problem and scrapes the bed to fix it. I’ve played with scraping and have a few scrapers but never done it in anger. Let’s see how it all shapes up first. I’m sure I’ll probably be posting about it for weeks.

Steve

30/07/2022 11:50:47

Hi all

I picked up an Eagle surface grinder from eBay. It was pretty mucky, so en route to the shed I took it to bits, cleaned it up, rubbed it down and gave it a coat of paint. Now I can see what I have it doesn’t look in bad nick, and I can make sure it’s properly lubricated as it goes back together. Then the DTI will tell me what I really have.

A couple of questions… When I loosened the gibs, a number of small wires fell out, I’m not sure exactly from where, but they look like they were used to adjust the ways, or two reduce movement. Picture below, can anybody explain what these before and how I can reinstall them?

1f039fcc-b93f-42ba-a4e2-f6f8684f32be.jpeg

Second, the bellows were completely shot. They are not really installable. I found some reasonably priced bellows on eBay, but they are simply flat and the original bellows had 90° bends to wrap around the ways. Does anybody know whether these kind of bellows can be modified to work better with the machine?

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/195174551731?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=bap--a-2t-y&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=yn_RRMPtS_W&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY

Cheers

Steve

caff144e-0d30-4760-a866-9e114d976f63.jpeg

b4a4a076-6753-4819-8d7e-94a39c29d041.jpeg

96bdaa28-126a-4089-af34-836273b23fd9.jpeg

Thread: VFD Advice
25/07/2022 09:51:07
Posted by Thor 🇳🇴 on 25/07/2022 05:49:20:

Hi Steve,

There are solutions that provide 3-phase 400V out from single phase 230V, one example here.

Thor

Great idea, I just picked up a “new/other” one - 2hp version, on eBay for £80.

Problem solved - hopefully! Thanks!

Steve

25/07/2022 09:02:56
Posted by not done it yet on 25/07/2022 06:16:10:

Looks like it is either a Hammond or an Eagle.

Guessing it must be the Hammond - because a simple search on the forum would have provided oodles of info on the Eagle.

Go on, don’t be so secretive with the details. Which machine is it?


its the Eagle. I didn’t think to search the forum on VFDs for the Eagle.

Well I got it from Wales to Herts, now the really hard bit of getting it out of the car and into the shed.

caff144e-0d30-4760-a866-9e114d976f63.jpeg

24/07/2022 22:11:13

Hi

looks like I got myself a new toy on eBay (surface grinder) but it’s 3 phase and I only have a standard 240v mains supply. I’ve been looking into VFDs but it seems complicated,

Could somebody knowledgeable please tell me what a suitable 3 phase conversion device might be. I’ve tried to get a pic of the motor plate but it’s in the most awkward place. Hopefully its readable.

thanks

Steve

339a9561-84f8-4daf-aa97-bf00365aa125.jpeg

Thread: Radius Geometry Question
10/07/2022 17:37:47
Posted by JasonB on 10/07/2022 13:14:25:

yes would need a different approach now you say you are making more complex moulding planes. I got rid of 4 large stacking boxes of them about 10yrs ago, gave them to a french polisher that I did the odd bit of turning for. These days if its a shortish run needed I'll just rough out by a series of saw cuts, odd bit with a spindle moulder or router and then just hand finish. Quicker and cheaper than getting a pair of knives and limiters made for my spindle moulder.

As for machining the blocks a simple bar driven by the chuck and supported by the tailstock, drilled for an HSS blank and cross drilled for a locking grub screw will do. Just adjust tool projection to alter radius.

Concave can be done by mounting on a carrier and just turning the outer radius for all but the very smallest

Also hopefully it's obvious but your radius on the convex blocks will need to be SMALLER by the thickness of the abrasive.

That’s really useful Jason, thanks.

I can see that the difficulty with that method is that on a lathe there is no Z axis movement. So a concave surface would either need to be cut in one pass, or the cutter would have to be carefully extended after each pass.

Or (2) the workpiece could be mounted on an angle plate on the cross slide.

Or (3) I could do it on my horizontal mill, although I can’t drill a hole through the 1” arbor, but I might find a way to make it work for some of the larger blocks.

Steve

10/07/2022 12:42:28
Posted by Martin Connelly on 10/07/2022 08:31:58:

Just pointing out that if you have trouble imagining the change in radius again think about what would happen if you added a layer of sandpaper to the inside of a pipe with a 2" bore. You would not expect the bore inside the sandpaper to still be 2" would you?

Martin C

That’s a very useful way to visualise it, thanks.

10/07/2022 12:41:35
Posted by JasonB on 10/07/2022 07:44:11:

Also if working to thous then you will also need to increase the width of your block to fully support the abrasive as the larger radius ark will mean the block width increases.

radius block.jpg

The width is set by the sole of the plane. Interesting point though, I will bear that in mind today when doing the drawings.

10/07/2022 12:39:32
Posted by JasonB on 10/07/2022 07:20:19:

I'd make the block wider than the 60deg arc if that is the width of your timber, being able to roll the block will make sanding more efficient and the abrasive less likely to clog and even if you want to sand straight you are unlikely to be able to hold the block dead in line with the edges of the wood.

With 16 plane to make I'd be looking a knocking something up to rotate the roughed out wooden blocks against moving abrasive, with a movable pivot so you can do different radii.

If you have a lathe I would cut the concave face of the sanding block with that, more likely to give the numbers you want without having to allow for under/over size prints, casting shrinkage, surface finish on print or casting, etc

It’s 32 planes…

939f8af0-bf86-4591-b03b-fbd6f04888a2.jpeg

I have already made 11 of them but stopped at the point of profiling the soles for 10 of them, as 3d printing a sanding block massively helped getting the first one to work properly.

You are right that it would be useful to make them oversize. But I want to use them to make other planes, and certainly for the concave blocks, I wouldn’t be able to get into gaps - see pic.

2662f0c2-a572-4d9f-87b6-482c663ae0cd.jpeg

On the casting, it didn’t go well, but I learnt a lot. You are right about the surface finish and shrinkage. If anyone has any practical ways of milling or turning these shapes, I’m all ears. I think in the end I might just use 3d printed blocks. They are accurate and stable enough. I’d love to have them in brass, but unless I stop somewhere with “making the tools to make the tools to make the tools” my wife will never get her greenhouse and my son will never get his sash window, which in the end is what all this is for, in the end.

10/07/2022 12:18:55
Posted by DC31k on 10/07/2022 06:13:06:

But as soon as you apply the sandpaper, its abrasive grains will start to wear down, changing the radius it sands...

And if you are applying a vertical force to the block, the pressure distribution over the curve of its working surface will not be uniform, so both the wear and the material removal rate will vary...

And if you are to use more than one grit of abrasive, the thickness of the sandpaper itself will vary (the paper is the same for each grade; the sharp bits glued on reduce in size as the P-number increases)...

All correct, I will stick to the same grit (240) though, and the diametral dimension is not *that* critical - it’s the longitudinal dimension that’s most important.

10/07/2022 12:13:45
Simple answer … Your instinct was right

BUT, as Howard has observed, you are confusing Radius and Diameter

MichaelG.

True, but the reason is (apart from being late when I wrote it) that these blocks are called radius blocks (used a lot in luthiery), and radius gauges are called radius gauges, not diameter gauges. It only takes a minor slip of the brain to confuse them in a post because of that. That’s my excuse anyway.

10/07/2022 12:07:15

Wow, lots of responses! I will answer with them one by one….

Steve

10/07/2022 03:03:04
Posted by Steve355 on 10/07/2022 02:55:04:
Posted by Howard Lewis on 10/07/2022 02:30:40:

IF it is imperative that the radius of the wood is EXACTLY 2", the the block needs to be machined to 2.015" concave radius, (4.030" Diameter ) so that when the sandpaper is attached, the surface of the sandpaper that touches the wood will then be 2".

If the object is to produce a convex radius the block needs to be machined to 1.985" radius, so that when the sandpaper is attached the surface touching the wood will be 2" radius.

In practical terms, how long it will stay 2" radius may be a moot point, if we are chasing thousandths of an inch.

Howard

GRRR Smileys!

Edited By Howard Lewis on 10/07/2022 02:31:40

Thanks Howard, I’m not going mad, that’s what I thought.

I know it may seem obtuse to be chasing thousandths of an inch in woodworking, but it is for sanding a plane sole. The thickness of the shaving it can take (needs to be 0.001 ish) is defined by the flatness of the sole If I’m going to make a sanding block that is that accurate longitudinally, I may as well make sure the radius is as accurate as possible too, so the plane is an accurate tool.

my original idea was to cast these blocks in brass for stability, I still haven’t completely given up on that!

Steve

ps I think I said radius in the original post when I meant diameter.

10/07/2022 02:55:04
Posted by Howard Lewis on 10/07/2022 02:30:40:

IF it is imperative that the radius of the wood is EXACTLY 2", the the block needs to be machined to 2.015" concave radius, (4.030" Diameter ) so that when the sandpaper is attached, the surface of the sandpaper that touches the wood will then be 2".

If the object is to produce a convex radius the block needs to be machined to 1.985" radius, so that when the sandpaper is attached the surface touching the wood will be 2" radius.

In practical terms, how long it will stay 2" radius may be a moot point, if we are chasing thousandths of an inch.

Howard

GRRR Smileys!

Edited By Howard Lewis on 10/07/2022 02:31:40

Thanks Howard, I’m not going mad, that’s what I thought.

I know it may seem obtuse to be chasing thousandths of an inch in woodworking, but it is for sanding a plane sole. The thickness of the shaving it can take (needs to be 0.001 ish) is defined by the flatness of the sole If I’m going to make a sanding block that is that accurate longitudinally, I may as well make sure the radius is as accurate as possible too, so the plane is an accurate tool.

my original idea was to cast these blocks in brass for stability, I still haven’t completely given up on that!

Steve

10/07/2022 01:51:45

Hi

I have recently been trying to make a set of radius sanding blocks (for woodwork), in fact the subject of a recent post I did on casting. I’m stuck in a hotel for the weekend, so I’m busy drawing up the 3-D printing designs for all 16 sanding blocks I need.

I have a question that I think probably only a moron would ask, but I’ve been thinking about it too long and I’m going around in circles (no pun intended).

For example, a particular sanding block needs to precisely sand a 60 degree radius of a 2 inch circle - which happens to make the block exactly an inch wide. But I need to take account of the sandpaper, which is 0.015” thick.

The question is, does the addition of the sandpaper to the block:

1) simply “translate” the 2” radius on the sanding block by 0.015” or

2) create the next 0.015” ring of a concentric circle, meaning that to create a sanding surface of exactly 2” od , I need the sanding block to have radius 2”+0.015”.

it seemed obvious to me that the answer was (2) but the more I think about it I’m not sure!

Pic below hopefully explains. Feel free to tell me I’m a moron.

Steve

544a2335-5e06-44a0-be1e-e7d6f33f3723.jpeg
c5d65aec-7dba-4619-aeeb-6e3e083c9c9c.jpeg

Edited By Steve355 on 10/07/2022 01:53:11

Edited By Steve355 on 10/07/2022 02:06:02

Thread: Casting Advice (no laughing please)
03/07/2022 23:36:12
Posted by Mark Rand on 03/07/2022 21:25:12:
Posted by Steve355 on 02/07/2022 15:27:19:

Luker

I see, thanks.

I think I have realised that I’m barking up the wrong tree with this particular part, because of shrinkage. It’s actually supposed to be a precision part, with the arcs on the picture being 60° of a 2 inch circle, plus and minus 15 thou for sandpaper. The reason I wanted to cast it, was because I couldn’t see a way to machine it with the machines I have. But casting just isn’t gonna give the accuracy I need. We live and learn!

Never mind, I have another pattern printed for a different thing, a stamp for wood.

I am determined to crack this though, so many possibilities open up if one can cast parts then machine them.

<Photo snipped>

I think what I’m going to do, is order some proper greensand from sdts (actually not as expensive as I thought) then I’m off abroad for work for a couple of weeks, then I’ll come back to it.

Thanks for your help

thanks for your help

Cheers

Steve

Steve, What machines, if any do you have for machining or are you only set up for wood-spoiling instead of metal-spoiling?

If it's SDTS in Nuneaton that you are using, I'm in Rugby. If you want to try making a casting that's a tad larger in all dimensions, I could mill it to the desired final dimensions.


Hi Mark, yes I have machines, I’ve got a Zyto lathe, a Dore Westbury mill, and a Burke #4 horizontal mill. I spent a while trying to work out how to do this. The project is a set of hollow and round planes. That’s 16 hollows and 16 rounds - 32 planes, all with different dimensions = 32 sanding blocks. I was reducing this to 16 by putting 2 profiles on one block. I thought about turning and boring the blocks from round stock, but the amount of metal is significant and the waste would be substantial. I thought about milling from rectangular stock using the vertical mill and my little rotary table, but they are 4” long and get quite skinny, so it’s not practical.

the reality is I don’t actually need them in brass. Basically, I made a #14 round plane, which has a 2” radius. It was very difficult to get the sole flat enough by hand for the plane to perform properly. I had the idea of 3d printing a sanding block of the right dimensions, and it worked beautifully - flat sole to a couple of thou, very easily. Then I thought it would be nice to have a set of sanding blocks in brass to hone the planes in the future as and when needed. So all I need to do is 3d print the blocks, put them in a bucket of sand, melt some brass and pour it in and hey presto, sanding blocks. Turned out not to be so simple, but if I can learn a bit about casting, then I can do some other projects.

Thanks for the offer though.

Steve

03/07/2022 10:27:09
Posted by lee webster on 03/07/2022 08:37:31:

Steve, I buy the Bromsgrove sand from them in a 25kg bag. I spread it out on a tarpauline in my conservatory to dry it for a few days, then use a flour sieve to remove all the bits bigger than fine sand. I loose about 2 to 3 kg of unwanted content. I then weigh the sand exactly, and seperate out one kilo. I add a small amount of water to the kilo, but not enough to make the sand wet. Very bad! This is why I do this with just one kilo, I am trying to determine how much natural clay is in the sand. With my last bag of sand I had to add 10% of bentonite before I felt happy. When I have the right mix, I can add bentonite and water to the rest of the sand which is then given a good whisking and is kept in a sealed container. If I haven't used the sand for a few weeks some of the water will have evaporated. I add a bit more water using a small spray bottle, give it a good mixing using something like a paint stirrer on a battery drill, and let it sit for several hours before using. If the sand is too wet I just leave the top off the container for half a day, stirring the sand now and then. If I have something like the name plate to cast, I will use a very fine sieve, finer than the flour sieve, to cover the surface with a thin layer of smaller grains of sand. Then I will use the flour sieve for put in 20-ishmm of sand, then just shovel it in to the top. I usually ram, not too hard, when the flask is about half full, then proper hard ramming when full. I allways pile the sand on high before ramming. I haven't got a muller for sand preparation, I just use the paint stirrer (home made) to fluff up the sand after each pour. Olfoundryman, Martin, and Swdweeb, Perry, on youtube are good people to watch. Martin is a proper pro, Perry is self taught and produces excellent results. Martin uses self prepared greensand and his surface finnish is second to none. His work makes my name plate look like it was made with a bag of boulders!

Lee

Edited By lee webster on 03/07/2022 08:41:14

Damn, I was hoping the bromsgrove sand might be a ready to go mixture, but if it has large bits in it, random amounts of bentonite, etc, I wonder what’s the difference between that and any other sand!

What sieve/riddle did you use? Do you know the grade by any chance?

03/07/2022 00:24:40
Posted by lee webster on 02/07/2022 22:52:40:

I buy my sand, sodium silicate, bentonite and ingots from Artisan foundry supplies. They are based in Liverpool here in the UK. When I first started casting I was given some greensand and bentonite by a local engineer. Before that I bought fine sand from B&Q and used cat litter which in some cases is mostly bentonite. It was all a waste of time. This photo is of a small oval name plate I made for the engineer. I made it with his greensand/bentonite and cast it with a zinc/aluminium alloy. The letters are 8-ishmm in height and protrudes from the surface 2mm. You can see the layer lines from the 3D print.

Edited By lee webster on 02/07/2022 22:53:52


Lee, that’s really impressive. Quite similar to some projects I’d like to do.

I was looking on the Artisan Foundry site. I see they have “Bromsgrove” greensand. But it isn’t clear if this is all that’s required or if it needs additives. What products do you use from their site?

Steve

02/07/2022 15:27:19

Luker

I see, thanks.

I think I have realised that I’m barking up the wrong tree with this particular part, because of shrinkage. It’s actually supposed to be a precision part, with the arcs on the picture being 60° of a 2 inch circle, plus and minus 15 thou for sandpaper. The reason I wanted to cast it, was because I couldn’t see a way to machine it with the machines I have. But casting just isn’t gonna give the accuracy I need. We live and learn!

c5d65aec-7dba-4619-aeeb-6e3e083c9c9c.jpeg

Never mind, I have another pattern printed for a different thing, a stamp for wood.

I am determined to crack this though, so many possibilities open up if one can cast parts then machine them.

I think what I’m going to do, is order some proper greensand from sdts (actually not as expensive as I thought) then I’m off abroad for work for a couple of weeks, then I’ll come back to it.

Thanks for your help

thanks for your help

Cheers

Steve

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate