Here is a list of all the postings Mark Slatter has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: D1-4 Cam Dimensions Query? |
14/09/2018 20:31:33 |
I'm trying to make myself a set of D1-4 cams to replace the dodgy Chinese ones that were supplied with my lathe. A number of forum members here have been very helpful in supplying the ISO standard drawings with dimensions (thanks again gents!)...however I can't determine what actually describes the cam portion of the part, or if in fact it is actually present on the diagram?! Please have a look at the section on cams from the ISO pdf I was sent. The cross section that shows the eccentric cam portion for the D1-4 cam is the bottom right hand one, the other views I'll include for good measure and the table of dimensions show what I have to work with. The eccentric cam portion of the part is not actually cylindrical either, so apparently shouldnt be able to be turned on a lathe? Also what is the "v" value of 250 degrees describing in the D1-4 cross section? |
Thread: D1-4 Cam drawing |
10/09/2018 20:29:45 |
Hi Murray, Many thanks for the drawings, much appreciated! |
10/09/2018 09:22:11 |
John, many thanks for your offer. Sorry for the late response, I have replied to your PM. |
28/08/2018 07:56:47 |
Hi David, Many thanks for your reply, much appreciated. I have indeed seen that eBay advert, unfortunately with shipping they are over ?30 each, and I'm sure there will be custom duties on top of that too. It's more than I'd like to pay at the moment. |
27/08/2018 20:24:03 |
Hi all, It seems the D1-4 studs and cams on my newly acquired (new to me, it is a used Chinese 12x36) lathe were manufactured slightly out of specification. The previous owner had used excessive force to try and tighten up the chuck and as a result the studs and cams are heavily galled, the cams do not line up and tighten as they should. I've found a set of replacement studs from RDG Tools which are on their way to me, however finding a set of replacement cams is proving far trickier...does anyone know of a local supplier? Failing that would anyone have some technical drawings of the D1-4 cams with dimensions as I should be able to make the replacements? Many thanks! |
Thread: Warco GH1236 DRO help! |
24/07/2018 19:04:53 |
Jon thanks for the reply. I've played with every variable I can think of. I can set it up for the X axis to show a diameter reduction no problem. I suppose I'm a little disappointed I can't get better resolution than 10 micron on the diameter, after all a DRO is partly there to encourage us to reach to tighter tolerances, despite the fact that the machine or in this case, operator, might not be up to the task. However on reflection that's a very small amount! On the odd occasion I may need better resolution I could set up a dial indicator off the cross slide, or use the compound to shave a whisker off. |
23/07/2018 19:24:52 |
Hello, I have the above lathe and and am trying to get my head around the DRO. Its a SINO SDS6, the stock DRO that comes with the lathe. Now research online has said to set the DRO to lathe mode, put the resolution on the X axis to 10, and the resolution on the Z axis to 5, which will then show a reduction in diameter of the part as opposed to a cross slide (radial) movement, which is ideal. Fine. However the X axis now only shows to two decimal places. Can anyone please tell me how to set this DRO up to show diameter reduction with three decimal places (+/- 5 micron ) on the X axis (which is what the Z axis reads out). Any help appreciated! |
Thread: Warco GH1236 power feed query? |
01/07/2018 18:19:28 |
Hi Daniel, Many thanks for your reply. You cracked it! I assumed the lever was in the correct position as it indicated movement towards the headstock going by the illustration, and when thread cutting does exactly that. It seems the directions are reversed when under power feed. Many thanks again! |
01/07/2018 15:30:59 |
Hello everyone, I have recently acquired this lathe and am in the process of getting it set up. I can't seem to get the carriage to feed towards the head stock however, with the chuck rotating anticlockwise as normal the carriage feeds away from the headstock. This problem is not evident when the lead screw is engaged when thread cutting, and this direction is selectable with a lever. Reversing the chuck direction reverses the power shaft rotation and the carriage will then feed towards the headstock. Not much use that is however! Any advice would be much appreciated! |
Thread: Acto Surface Grinder |
05/05/2018 18:23:23 |
Many thanks for the replies gents. I'm glad you were able to find the website Bandersnatch, the shaper on their site looked intriguing too. Andrew, you raise a good point. Comparing the acto wheel head column to other makes does seem to show it rather flimsy and possibly prone to deflection as well as twist. Pity there don't seem to be any examples on the usual forums, it would be interesting to get some user feedback. Edited By Mark Slatter on 05/05/2018 18:23:45 |
04/05/2018 16:43:04 |
Hi all, I found this company while trawling the interweb looking for a used surface grinder. No where to put it yet, but one can dream. Anyhow this company Acto (or Machinery Plans) offer plans for a surface grinder and the one on their website looks like a solid unit. Has anyone built one of these, or perhaps another machine from Acto and what are your thoughts on the quality of the plans, and the final product? Any advice appreciated! |
Thread: Upgrading a Denford Triac |
09/10/2017 09:35:00 |
Fantastic info, thanks very much for taking the time to reply gents, much appreciated! I'm getting quite excited to get this little mill up and running now, not enough hours in the day however. |
Thread: Denford Triac Mill |
09/10/2017 09:28:30 |
Thanks for the replies everyone, much appreciated! Yes In retrospect there are certainly enough quick change holders to get me going, so time will tell if I need to make more. Who knows perhaps I could do some mill turning on the triac and make some extras that way! Edited By Mark Slatter on 09/10/2017 09:29:03 |
Thread: Upgrading a Denford Triac |
08/10/2017 19:19:47 |
Hi Folks, I was going to ask the same queries on the Denford site but thought I would put them here as well, as there is a wealth of knowledge on this forum! Basically I have no idea what I'm doing lol. I have acquired a mid 80's green Triac, R8 spindle, no ATC. I'll be primarily using this for prototype development making parts out of steel, and will need to do some 3D machining. I'd like to be able to run Mach 3 on the mill as this software is well supported from a community point of view. As for parts, I was thinking to use steppers from CNC4You...Nema 23 3.1Nm for the X and Y, and a Nema 23 4Nm for the Z. Are these going to have enough grunt for this mill and application? Can anyone comment on the CNC4You reccomended drivers, namely the CW5045 (https://www.cnc4you.co.uk/Microstepping-Driver/Stepper-Motor-Driver-4.5A,-50V-CNC-Microstepping-CW5045) ? Any good? The price at £39 each seems good. An area that is confusing to me is the pplication of a motion controller. I have heard favourable reviews of the CSMIO IP-M...but frankly have no idea why you would need to add this bit of kit. Could someone explain its function to me please? I have seen simple conversions which use stepper drivers linked up to a BoB and all seems well, so why the need for a motion controller? Another thing I was wondering is what controls the spindle speed on a Triac? Is there a board or card that could be salvaged from the electronics and still be compatible with Mach3? Any help would be greatly appreciated, as would any suggestions for alternative components and suppliers. I am needing to do this on a tight budget.
Edited By Mark Slatter on 08/10/2017 19:20:55 |
Thread: Denford Triac Mill |
08/10/2017 18:45:41 |
Many thanks for the replies Nigel, David and Emgee, sorry for only acknowledging it now I've been a bit under the weather. Just as well Ive been lying in bed...those prices for the Easy Change toolholders are shocking!! I managed to get a few tooldholders with the mill however: It includes a ER32, ER25 and two ER16 collet holders, and a couple of other holders. A few hundred quids worth just in that lot! The owner was saying he might want something for the tooling...with those prices for extras I think I might consider selling them and making up some Tormach TTS style holders...it would work out cheaper in the long run I reckon. What do you think this is...I havnt had a chance to open it up and see what the collet looks like...but if its just a collet holder it seems a strange shape? Edited By Mark Slatter on 08/10/2017 18:46:48 Edited By Mark Slatter on 08/10/2017 18:49:03 Edited By Mark Slatter on 08/10/2017 18:55:37 |
05/10/2017 13:34:29 |
Many thanks for the info Emgee and David. The previous owner has offered to get it up and running with the original software, although I'm planning to do a mach 3 conversion as soon as possible. Interestingly it has a quick change system with some holders included. The adapter in the spindle is spring loaded with three ball bearings to locate and retain the tool holder. It seems a very slick system, was this a standard feature on Triacs? |
04/10/2017 06:39:59 |
That's more than good enough for what I need, thanks for the info Emgee. |
03/10/2017 20:13:55 |
I was wanting to use this mill both for a bit of fun and to teach myself the fundamentals of cnc machining. I'm capable with CAD but have not tried any CAM yet or programming... and will definitely want to be able to explore this side of things with the triac if possible. Exciting times! Out of interest Emgee what sort of tolerances are you able to keep with your mill? Or put another way what is a realistic expectation for these mills? Edited By Mark Slatter on 03/10/2017 20:14:45 |
03/10/2017 18:36:59 |
Well I have a result! I spoke to the owner (my boss) fully expecting to have to do some haggling but he gave it to me, no cost! Apparently it's ex college and in good nick, he's even offered to get it up and running. Judging by your pics Emgee it's the top left unit, I presume that's an earlier model? Apparently this one has steppers as opposed to servos. Many thanks for the info and links everyone. |
03/10/2017 13:13:26 |
Many thanks for the reply Emgee, appreciate it! I had a closer look at it today and it seems to be the standard R8 version with no ATC. Next step will be to see if she still fires up and make some chips. |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.