John Haine | 16/02/2021 17:06:28 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | I am attempting (again) to make an attachment to fit the Unimat 3 nose, which is threaded M14 x 1. I have a nice small internal insert threading tool from JB Tools. I've had a couple of attempts using Mach 3 both of which seemed to turn away most of the thread already cut! So I wanted to check the dimensions if anyone can help please. Nominal tapping size for this thread is 13mm, minimum minor dia 12.917 and max 13.153. Major dia is correspondingly 14 to 14.34 mm. For the first try I bored the hole to 12.92, and set the lathe to thread out to 14.21 (which is the maximum corresponding size according to a thread milling program I have). This didn't work so I'll try again. Seem to me that boring the hole to 13mm and setting the tool to cut from this diameter out to 14.1 mm should be about right. Yes, I know Mach3 has a poor reputation for threading but I've done quite a few external threads with no problem so I don't think it's M3's "fault". |
Chris Evans 6 | 16/02/2021 17:35:54 |
![]() 2156 forum posts | I think your problem may be with the "Truncating" of the thread form due to the insert not being full form. When I screwcut I always end up going a few thou deeper than the book size. Usually get to fit and function rather than measure over wires. Internal threading really requires a gauge that I do not possess. |
Clive Foster | 16/02/2021 18:23:05 |
3630 forum posts 128 photos | Internal thread cutting tools inevitably suffer much more from spring due to the actual cutting tip being at the end of a somewhat slender shaft. Getting a first cut going can be an issue. I recall one that just wouldn't start until I wound on about half the thread depth. Cleaning up ready to make sense of finishing was, ahem, troublesome. Insert tooling is generally worse for spring than boring bar style because the length of the shaft is what it is, in my experience always too long for the job I'm doing. A boring bar style carrying an HSS bit can be pulled right back into its mount so only the very minimum of unsupported shaft sicks out. Getting the tip cutting exactly in centre height is harder when working inside a bore. Heel clearance is often a issue too. I've codged up more than a few smallish bores due to not verifying that the heel of the tool under the tip has actually been ground back far enough and at a sufficiently steep angle to clear the bore proper allowing the tip to cut. Got so fed up that I made a set of drawings to show me the angles and tool depths needed for clearance. Thread cutting tools have exactly the same issue. Both holder and inserts should have specifications for minimum size bore. 13 mm sounds close to bottom limits for anything approaching normal sizes of tooling. If you have CAD it may be worth spenigh a few minutes drawing help visualise the thread form. Basically draw a triangle on top of a rectangle representing the initila shaft size and add lines for the tip of the tool and the tip of the thread across it. Then insert dimensions to get the appropriate radii. Zeus, or other references will have the base diagram and (far too many!) dimensions. Like most folk I sort of picked up how to cut a thread that fitted decently. I suspect all would have gone much more smoothly if I'd been sat a a drawing board and made to draw out the profiles and what the dimensions all mean thereby getting a solid visualisation of things. Clive Edited By Clive Foster on 16/02/2021 18:23:41 |
Howard Lewis | 16/02/2021 19:11:59 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | With any internal boring operation (Which is what an internal thread is, but with a high feed rate to,produce a spiral cut ) spring always comes into play, As the thread becomes deeper, the cutting forces increase so the spring becomes greater...So one or more spring cuts will still cut metal. Howard |
Martin Connelly | 17/02/2021 08:37:25 |
![]() 2549 forum posts 235 photos | I think your first step should be making a dummy spindle nose to act as a gauge. You don't want to make the thread to the theoretical size then have to take the set-up apart to check it followed by re-assembling to cut deeper. I've got one I made for my lathe that was a piece of scrap aluminium alloy. Good enough for home use where it only gets very occasional use. Martin C |
John Haine | 01/03/2021 16:25:09 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | Apologies to everyone who kindly responded here. I've just successfully made the thread using Mach3. The problem I was having was that I had the right bore diameter, 12.92, but was using (in effect) much too large a thread depth. Basically I looked it up in Martin Cleeves' book "Threading in the Lathe" and used his numbers - for Mach 3 you define the bore and the thread depth by the crest diameter - putting this at 14.04 mm (from his data) worked just fine. I find the trick with Mach 3 for boring is to start quite a bit smaller than final size and come up to size in quite large bites with an insert tool, with the last cut at finishing size, not pussyfooting round with "finish" cuts trying to take off gnats whiskers. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.