duncan webster | 28/04/2020 11:33:24 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | Haven't a clue, it was 'tight'. As it made no difference I didn't see any point quantifying it. Edited By duncan webster on 28/04/2020 11:35:15 |
Michael Gilligan | 28/04/2020 12:19:25 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by duncan webster on 28/04/2020 11:33:24:
Haven't a clue, it was 'tight'. As it made no difference I didn't see any point quantifying it. Edited By duncan webster on 28/04/2020 11:35:15 . I think that nicely demonstrates the difference in our approach to this ... In the absence of any evidence: I would imagine that your ‘tight’ is in the context of what would be appropriate to hold the cutter in place. To see any difference on a simple static load test; I would guess that you need at least ten [and possibly a hundred] times more tension than you are effecting. ... Which is one of the reasons why FEA would be so informative. Further discussion seems pointless; but thanks anyway. MichaelG. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.