No pressure
FMES | 12/11/2013 18:16:00 |
608 forum posts 2 photos | Posted by John Stevenson on 12/11/2013 09:13:44:
OK I stand corrected. I'm far more used to working on a higher class of pump than fitted to Colchesters and Harrisons I would also affirm that the Colchester pump is more a 'stirrer with attitude' than a pump per se. |
Robonthemoor | 13/11/2013 04:52:09 |
![]() 211 forum posts 45 photos | All done and working as it should, once we established it was .3 hp not 3hp, Al204 gave me his small converter he no longer uses and bigo 2800rpm and pumps like a good-en. thanks all for you help, could not have done it with out you. Rob |
Les Jones 1 | 13/11/2013 08:55:10 |
2292 forum posts 159 photos | 0.3 HP ???? Yet another figure. I thought it was decided it was 0.1 HP as marked on the plate. Accurate information to start with would have caused less confusion. Les. |
Robonthemoor | 13/11/2013 11:18:27 |
![]() 211 forum posts 45 photos | This iPhone and big finger don't go well, 0.1 hp is correct,. Sorry rob , |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.