Chris Trice | 31/12/2018 11:42:00 |
![]() 1376 forum posts 10 photos | Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 30/12/2018 17:10:17:
Posted by John Paton 1 on 30/12/2018 15:16:18:
Can I just reiterate XD351 advice - please be very careful. 250v DC is much more potent as a killer / source of burns than the same voltage AC. ...No-one would disagree with the advice to be very careful! However, as a pedantic point of order, John has it the wrong way round - 230Vac is more dangerous than 230Vdc. Three reasons:
It's best never to mess with electricity because the effects vary with voltage, frequency, individuals, and the nature of the contact. Rule of thumb says high voltages are more dangerous than low but it's unpredictable and/or contradictory. The lowest fatal shock I know of was from 32Vdc, admittedly in unlucky circumstances. DC is much more likely to arc than AC but 230Vdc is unlikely to arc to a human. In the USA they believe 110Vac to be safer than 230Vac systems because less current flows. Except muscle reaction to the shock means you're more likely to get stuck at 110Vac, so the current might flow for longer! In practice the two systems seem to be equally dangerous. Conversely, much higher voltages aren't always as lethal as might be confidently expected - electric chairs have failed to kill and people occasionally survive direct contact with the super-grid. Effects change with frequency as well. Radio Frequency power inflicts deep burns rather a shock. Is a shock from a VFD at full speed more dangerous than ordinary mains? No idea, and I'm not going to try it! Some people are far more sensitive to electricity than others which is why horseplay with a Megger is stupid. Bottom line - better safe than sorry! Taking calculated risks with suitable precautions is fine, careless gambling isn't. Turning something on from a distance to test it is pretty safe compared with powering up and then poking around inside the same kit with a 6" nail and a belief in one's personal immortality... Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 30/12/2018 17:13:19 It also depends on the route that the current takes through your body to earth. Through the chest obviously presents a higher risk. |
sean logie | 31/12/2018 11:44:51 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | Anyways ..... back to the job in hand and on topic ,I'm confused enough without being side tracked by the shocking stories (No pun intended 😉![]() Sean |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.