Michael Topping | 10/01/2018 19:29:32 |
74 forum posts 5 photos | Maybe because I come from an industrial background, toolmaker, I never had any doubt that I would fit a QCTP to my own lathe. I have now collected some 30 toolholders all in occasional use. I have no problems with lack of rigidity, can take .125 cut in M/S easy and part of silver steel with no chatter. I can't see any reason why you wouldn't buy one, the ease of setting up new tools and the speed of changeover when doing multiple tool jobs is so obvious. By the way mine is a Warco unit, I have a Dixon one but can't afford the holders to go onto it! Michael |
David Standing 1 | 10/01/2018 19:53:28 |
1297 forum posts 50 photos | Posted by Michael Topping on 10/01/2018 19:29:32:
By the way mine is a Warco unit, I have a Dixon one but can't afford the holders to go onto it! Michael
Dickson |
Jon | 10/01/2018 21:43:19 |
1001 forum posts 49 photos | Posted by John Alexander Stewart on 10/01/2018 13:11:29:
One item that makes me love them is that, when making batches of parts, they all come out the same, as when you mount a new tool, it goes exactly where you want it to be. One mistake I made at first was to have a handle on the toolpost that allowed me to swivel it around. It should be locked in place so that tools go back on in the correct orientation; for instance, a parting tool simply drops on, and no faffling about ensuring that it is aligned properly. One set of vees parallel to the centre line, one set at right angles - lock it down and forget about moving it after that. Simple check face off and zero any dials or dro. For simple machining or where specific tooling is available i would agree but invloves more tools and holders. Certainly agree there are times i wish mine were locked down, ideal for batch work where you can create tooling offsets and store in the DRO.
|
Nick Hulme | 14/01/2018 12:48:41 |
750 forum posts 37 photos | Posted by John Alexander Stewart on 10/01/2018 13:11:29:
One mistake I made at first was to have a handle on the toolpost that allowed me to swivel it around. It should be locked in place so that tools go back on in the correct orientation; Genuine Dickson and the better clones have a vertical through-hole in one corner, this allows the engineer who knows what it's for to make and fit a locking pin with associated shallow indexing holes in the base under it, any well designed QCTP will have a facility for quickly returning to a known zero position. I can move my front and rear Dickson QCTPs to any angle I like and then lock them back at 90 degrees with the locking pins. It did take me a while before I realised what the hole was for |
John Haine | 14/01/2018 12:53:57 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | Worth looking for s/h holders. I picked up a job lot of 4 or 5 Dickson holders literally from the back of a lorry at a local steam fair for £5 the lot! I wasn't sure they'd fit my base but at that price it was worth a put! But turned out exact size. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.