Here is a list of all the postings Mike Tupper has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: Subscribers only |
03/09/2009 09:43:04 |
Hi, in response to Versaboss. Yes, as a subscriber to both, I can see ME & MEW. You move down the listing to scroll to the MEW. (The sub nos are the same and must be saved in both boxes on the details page.) Regards, Mike |
Thread: Flexipage |
02/09/2009 20:23:09 |
Hi, still having print problems. The right hand column is truncated eg. "To be conti " and the footer loses the lower part of a drwg and the page nos. I would like to find a print solution as some of the articles I am following have drawings placed at the lower part of the page. The go to page command can only move to a relative page number and not the printed page number, so not much help in ME and indexing the page numbers in the hundreds. Regards, Mike |
27/08/2009 00:06:34 |
Hi, the back issues are a great addition but I am having some problems with the viewer. Jump to Page does not function with some volumes as it cannot see larger nos. Print page cuts the lower part of the page even when 'fit to page' or 'scale' commands are set in the printer. I have tried various printers, with the same result. (Firefox 3.5.2 Flashplayer 10) Anyone else getting this? Regards, Mike |
Thread: Subscribers only |
16/08/2009 14:59:25 |
Hi David, thank you for the 'Back Issues' section. In the ME section I note the there are few missing from the sequence. (4315,17,19,50,53,54,55). Can these be included please? Regards, Mike |
Thread: Northumberland locomotive additional dimension |
12/08/2009 21:55:45 |
Hi David, I mean the original thread relating to Northumbrian under Projects & Articles started by Chris 19/7 titled First project. Not this one under ME Comments. Regards, Mike |
12/08/2009 16:25:01 |
Hi David, thank you for the eventual answer to my original posting. Do you think it possible to ensure this latest significant posting and come to that the last few threads, could be entered on the Northumbrian threads as well? This ensures that anyone following postings to a particular thread and may have email alerts set, can be made aware of this latest information. Regards, Mike |
Thread: Northumbrian First Project |
31/07/2009 17:27:48 |
Hi David, thanks for the prompt reply. My reluctance to drill is my observation that the top centre cylinder hole appears to be vertically above the rear hole of part 10 according to the plan but not on my layout. Can I have some cross reference measurements, for example distance between axle centres? I have 7.0625" (71/16). (Frame length overall 11 9/16".) This may show if I have miss-read the drawing. Many apologies, Mike |
31/07/2009 15:37:03 |
Hi David, having laid out the frame I find the position of the cylinder to appear to be too far back, as though the 6" stroke is 1/4" too long. Looking at the plan, the rear-most hole in part 10 seems to square with the top centre hole of the cylinder but is 1/4" out when I lay it out according to the given dimensions. Forgive me if I have miss-read a dimension but I have checked several times. Even the photo 4 page 30 (4355) suggests my layout has an error. Any others aware of this? Regards, Mike |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.