Here is a list of all the postings AJAX has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: Worm wanted for lathe |
10/01/2021 18:06:08 |
Posted by AJAX on 10/01/2021 18:03:35:
Posted by AJAX on 10/01/2021 18:01:43:
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 10/01/2021 17:29:55:
Looks like the hole in the lever is much larger than the pin. I would be turning a bush to make it a good sliding fit. Or make a new pin to fit the hole.
Pete, it's a good fit. However, I don't rule out the possibility of making a modified pin in the future. Have also considered drilling through and tapping so I can adjust the pressure. Oh, I think I may have misunderstood. Did you mean the hole in the hand-operated lever or the cradle that holds the worm gear? |
10/01/2021 18:03:35 |
Posted by AJAX on 10/01/2021 18:01:43:
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 10/01/2021 17:29:55:
Looks like the hole in the lever is much larger than the pin. I would be turning a bush to make it a good sliding fit. Or make a new pin to fit the hole.
Pete, it's a good fit. However, I don't rule out the possibility of making a modified pin in the future. Have also considered drilling through and tapping so I can adjust the pressure. |
10/01/2021 18:01:43 |
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 10/01/2021 17:29:55:
Looks like the hole in the lever is much larger than the pin. I would be turning a bush to make it a good sliding fit. Or make a new pin to fit the hole.
|
10/01/2021 14:20:24 |
As promised earlier, here is a bit of an update. The lathe is currently stripped down so I am unable to test the powered feed under load. However, I have reversed the unevenly worn worm and made a "temporary feedshaft" (turned to size at work and then milled the slot at home) so I can see what is happening. When I did this it was quite obvious the worm was not being lifted sufficiently to engage with the worm wheel. There is a lever-operated cam at the front of the apron which lifts the worm mechanism via a pin; I have now added a spring behind the pin to make sure that it engages positively. This has greatly improved the action and the lift. Turning the feedshaft over by hand it all appears to work well; the visual signs and "feel" suggest good gear engagement. I should have the lathe back together and under power to test in a few days time. The temporary feedshaft will make it infinitely easier to get the lathe back together (the temporary will slide out as the real one pushes in) and means I'm quite happy to pull it all apart again when I turn a replacement worm. Thanks for your interest and advice. Brian |
08/01/2021 22:07:49 |
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 08/01/2021 22:00:06:
The M300 at your work will cut that worm if you set it to 23TPI (C5SY) and swap the 88 and 44 gears around. Still need to swap gears with the full gearbox? I will have to download a manual as I am unfamiliar with the lathe apart from basic tasks. |
08/01/2021 21:33:47 |
* Harrison M300 |
08/01/2021 21:32:13 |
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 08/01/2021 19:32:21:
Well, given that the kind gentleman has pointed you to the correct drawing on the Denford forum: You now have all the info to produce your worm. Bonus if you can find a lathe which has 5 3/4TPI on the gearbox. CVA has that pitch on the gearbox as does my Monarch.
The replies on Denford Data and this website have been very useful. I nipped into work today to borrow a lathe and turn that temporary "feedshaft" so I can test the feed gears with the apron away from the lathe. I noticed their lathe (Harrison ML300) is turning a taper and so presumably the tailstock needs adjusting. Like most equipment there, it doesn't get used. However, I'm not getting involved with that as I have enough jobs to do! I've finished cleaning up the apron which was thick with an awful paint that had been slapped on top. At least it looks nice. I will report back in due course. |
08/01/2021 10:05:00 |
Posted by Martin Connelly on 08/01/2021 09:25:03:
The issue of unwanted disengagement in the original post makes me wonder if there is some sort of over-centering mechanism (toggle) that is not going over centre to lock it. Either there is a mechanical stop that is damaged, dirty or needs adjustment or the operator may not be putting in the necessary input to go past the toggle point. Martin C Martin, I think that you and the others have raised valid points that need to be considered. It has been difficult to diagnose this problem with the apron assembled and in place as the gears are not not visible. e.g. Is it worn gears, poor meshing, or bad locking mechanism? When the apron is removed, the feedshaft is no longer in place to hold the gears and see what is happening. What I have decided to do is to turn a short length of "dummy feedshaft" (doesn't need to be particularly accurate) to hold the gears in position when the apron is removed from the lathe. I can then turn it over by hand with the gears in full view. I should then be in a much better position to know what is happening. |
08/01/2021 00:02:22 |
Ady and Pete, I see your point. Actually when I first tried the rotary lever I had the very feeling it wasn't engaging properly. Maybe that's why the worm became worn and not the other way round. I will take another look over the weekend. Let's hope for some warmer weather as my garage is FREEZING! Brian |
07/01/2021 23:05:41 |
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 07/01/2021 23:02:01:
Yes you're right, lacking a drawing I used the figures you quote not giving any allowance for the clearance. It was more so you could compare what I think you should have with what you actually have. There would need to be a clearance allowance. Thanks for confirming that. I took some measurements in case anyone is interested. |
07/01/2021 22:56:43 |
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 07/01/2021 22:18:49:
The drawing you're looking for is ML110_309 it's the drawing for the worm gear. It's a 18DP 14.5PA LH worm gear of 33 teeth left hand helix and 1.8334" pitch diameter. Going by the specs on that drawing your worm should be I think 1.098" diameter 0.174" lead single start LH worm. Edited By Pete Rimmer on 07/01/2021 22:26:36 Pete, Please excuse my questions.. I'm a novice. You mentioned 1.098" worm diameter. I assume you got that from (0.429"R + 0.120" tooth depth) * 2 which equals 1.098" or 27.89mm The least worn diameter of the worm measures slightly less at 27.63mm. Looking at the working drawing should we also take the specified clearance into account when calculating the worm diameter? |
07/01/2021 22:46:16 |
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 07/01/2021 22:34:47:
If this is your only lathe you could start by turning the worm gear over. That would put 90% of the load on the un-worn side. That would get your auto-feeds working at least towards the chuck but probably both directions since you'll have the worn part of the worm acting on the unworn part of the wheel, and vice-versa. Then you're going to have to figure out the gearing to get a lead of 0.174" or 4.4196mm to make a new worm using a threading tool ground to 14.5 degrees which is ACME thread angle. Reversing the worm... Great idea! It's definitely worth a try. |
07/01/2021 22:25:46 |
Posted by old mart on 07/01/2021 21:23:09:
A long shot, but is there any way of increasing the engagement? That might allow you to reduce the diameter of the worm by 1/8". Thanks for your suggestion but I don't think so. |
07/01/2021 22:25:18 |
Posted by Pete Rimmer on 07/01/2021 22:18:49:
The drawing you're looking for is ML110_309 it's the drawing for the worm gear. It's a 18DP 14.5PA LH worm gear of 33 teeth left hand helix and 1.8334" pitch diameter. Going by the specs on that drawing your worm should be I think 1.098" diameter 0.174" lead single start LH worm. Thank you Pete. |
07/01/2021 22:24:21 |
Posted by Nigel Graham 2 on 07/01/2021 21:12:27:
I would suggest identifying the worm's and wheel's vital statistics and seeing what replacement stock items may be available and suitable for modifying to fit. You might need go nearest-metric and it could entail making or modifying other parts, but a bit more easily and potentially a lot more cheaply (say around £80 - £100 for a stock worm and wheel?) than having one-off specials made commercially. Don't replace the one without the other.
Good advice and pretty much what I would have guessed but I can see this ending up as more expensive than the lathe itself. Maybe I might strike lucky and see a whole apron assembly for sale somewhere. Or perhaps one day I may have the skills to make these parts. As an aside, I'm not totally convinced it is necessary to get the feed shaft working (which requires a good worm and worm wheel). A working feed shaft can power the cross feed (nice feature, but not absolutely necessary) but the separate lead screw and half nuts already work All I need is some more gears or an electronic drive to make it more usable. |
07/01/2021 20:38:54 |
I have a long-overdue job that needs to be done to restore this lathe. The feedshaft worm is badly worn and spares appear unavailable. I've been on the Denford Data website where there appears to be a number of knowledgeable and helpful guys and I'm hopeful that I can get the original drawings for the worm. With or without the drawings I would like to get a new worm sourced or made and I'm wondering if anyone can make a suitable recommendation. I'd expect to pay a fair rate but we have to be realistic as this is not a top-end lathe. Incidentally, by visual inspection it is my presumption the worn worm is the cause of partial engagement (and unwanted disengagement). The worm wheel looks to be in much better condition but it remains in the gearbox and taking a photo is tricky at present. However, I would have expected the worm wheel to wear at a faster rate than the worm but maybe I've got that wrong. I'm based in Dorset. Thanks for reading, Brian |
Thread: Denford Viceroy Compound slide removal |
06/01/2021 00:35:46 |
I've been scouring the Internet and found a photo that shows the top slide assembly disassembled. Curiously, I still can't see anything that is holding the compound slide in place. Maybe oil and suction? I'll have to take another look tomorrow. The photo: http://www.denfordata.com/bb/download/file.php?id=44 Found in this topic: http://www.denfordata.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=457 |
05/01/2021 23:28:22 |
05/01/2021 23:25:47 |
In my quest to semi-restore (not too interested in paint jobs) and improve the function of my Denford Viceroy lathe I am part-way through dismantling the cross slide, apron and compound slide. Despite close inspection, I cannot see what stops me separating the swiveling compound slide from the cross slide. The three grub screws that are used to lock rotation are now fully removed. It swivels freely. The compound slide lifts away from the cross slide by a few mm but is clearly being retained by something. But what? Apart from that, the dismantling is going well. I had to knock out a couple more pins (see my previous thread) but these were much easier and there were no substitute roll pins this time. |
Thread: Restoring a Boxford AUD ll |
05/01/2021 23:10:24 |
You can buy those link belts on eBay - no need to purchase 7.6m They cost about £18 per metre. I bought some for my Denford lathe and they work just fine. |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.