Here is a list of all the postings Bill Phinn has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: Oxy Acetylene or Oxy Propane? | |||||
18/12/2018 13:18:15 | |||||
Posted by not done it yet on 18/12/2018 12:00:46:
Bill, I, too, use an oxycon. Could do with a larger one when one comes up at a good price. Mine is a 5l size. What size is yours? Mine is 5L too. I've never needed a bigger one, but then I've not done any big projects yet. If you want a 10L one, it might be worth giving Tuffnell Glass a call. They're advertising new 10L ones (at over a grand!), but they say they have reconditioned ones as well in 5L, 8L and 10L, though only the 5L reconditioned ones seem to be viewable on their site at the moment. | |||||
18/12/2018 02:33:50 | |||||
Brian, I have an oxy-propane set-up that uses an oxygen concentrator in place of bottled gas. I believe the oxygen produced is not quite as pure as that out of a bottle but most users say it is considerably cheaper in the long run to use a concentrator. Many also say it is safer. All oxygen concentrators, afaik, have a dial on them to regulate the flow of gas. | |||||
Thread: Year of Engineering | |||||
16/12/2018 17:07:36 | |||||
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 16/12/2018 15:13:12:All great men, but everyone depends on everyone else.
Dave Well said.
Posted by Mick Charity on 16/12/2018 16:04:16:
P.S. One of my personal heroes & a man whose work I have studied intensively is Sir Humphrey Davey (a chemist) & I feel it is important in the general scheme of things to remember that Sir HD himself mentions Michael Faraday as his greatest discovery. I see Davy as not giving due credit there to Faraday's employer, the bookbinder George Riebau, who was the one who supplied his apprentice with tickets to attend Davy's lectures at the Royal Institution. Davy was actually discouraging at first towards Faraday's scientific experimentation; on meeting him for the first time he urged him to stick to his day job of bookbinding. There's an interesting monograph on Faraday written by one of his descendants in this year's Society of Bookbinders' journal that sheds light on this and other matters.
Sorry for so many edits; that's what comes from typing when you're not wearing your glasses. Edited By Bill Phinn on 16/12/2018 17:08:11 Edited By Bill Phinn on 16/12/2018 17:08:45 Edited By Bill Phinn on 16/12/2018 17:10:45 | |||||
Thread: New member | |||||
15/12/2018 22:14:37 | |||||
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 15/12/2018 20:12:47: It is perfectly possible [albeit rather tedious] to do this by hand, with a piercing saw
+1 for using a piercing saw. For 0.6mm sheet you would ideally use a 6/0 blade or finer. | |||||
Thread: Telephone / Internet Scams | |||||
14/12/2018 21:07:09 | |||||
Posted by DMB on 14/12/2018 20:25:00:
I refuse to pay extra each month just to know who is calling. Just let it get on and ring then after a few mins., dial 1471.If I recognise the number I call back. Also check 1571 for messages. Needless to say, scammers don't usually leave a number and never a message. Only problem is if I ring surgery to make an appointment. They ring back but don't leave their number. I now get frequent calls from what seems like London or Manchester codes but of course they can be faked. "If in doubt, chuck it out" You seem to have mixed up two separate things.
You get "caller display" free of charge, so if the caller has not withheld their number you get to see the number the caller is (purportedly) ringing from. "Call Minder" blocks those kinds of "frequent calls" you speak of, which only distract you from more worthwhile activities. | |||||
14/12/2018 19:59:38 | |||||
I have BT "call-minder" (or whatever it's called) on my home phone, which seems to weed out a lot of nuisance calls. An even better way of weeding out calls is never to answer the phone unless you know who's calling. If the caller really needs to contact you they'll leave a message, email or write a letter. If it's really urgent, they can ring 999. Operating this policy now for many years I'm glad to say it's never caused me any headaches whilst probably saving me many. | |||||
Thread: scam? | |||||
03/12/2018 16:51:38 | |||||
Posted by David Standing 1 on 03/12/2018 09:40:11:
Tell the purchaser to pay in full by PayPal, or bank transfer, and they can collect when they like. You will probably never hear from them again. Things may have changed since I last looked, but I believe accepting a Paypal payment and then allowing the buyer to collect can leave a seller in a situation where the buyer does collect and then files an "item not received" claim with Paypal. Paypal (in the absence of any proof that the item was handed over to the buyer) sides with the buyer and the seller loses both the item and his money. Caveat vendor! Edited By Bill Phinn on 03/12/2018 16:52:28 | |||||
Thread: Profiles | |||||
27/11/2018 19:46:27 | |||||
Posted by Derek Lane 2 on 27/11/2018 11:46:14:
What are peoples thoughts on this I think if you've asked for the kind of help that definitely requires potential respondents to know at least more or less where you live in order to give useful answers then it's a little foolish not to state in the relevant post where you are in the world. On the other hand, if you're not asking for location-dependent advice then I don't really see the need to publicize where you are.
| |||||
Thread: Unrecognised Acronym on ebay listings 'UKPL' | |||||
19/11/2018 17:59:59 | |||||
I meant "£1,000,000美元" reads "£1,000,000 American dollars".
| |||||
19/11/2018 17:17:58 | |||||
Posted by Neil Wyatt on 19/11/2018 12:35:11:
恭喜您是第100位客户,询问UKPL的含义是什么?你赢了£1,000,000美元。请将您的银行详情发送给我们。
It's not come out quite right, Neil. Among other infelicities, "£1,000,000美元" reads "£1000 American dollars".
| |||||
19/11/2018 10:18:52 | |||||
I asked a question:
and I have an answer: 亲爱的顾客您好 | |||||
18/11/2018 13:34:43 | |||||
UK Product Line, possibly. I've searched for these items on Ebay.cn in both English and Chinese but so far without success. | |||||
Thread: The new talking Mercedes | |||||
16/11/2018 03:22:24 | |||||
![]() then a further 500k, so a full million kms, before being sold off to the private market.
Edited By thaiguzzi on 16/11/2018 02:42:10 Some of these sold-off taxis ended up in Beirut, among other places, where their working life started in earnest. "Beirut Merc" is a proverbial expression in my household for an old car that seems like it will go on forever. Eta: Apologies for giving the impression that the image of the Beirut Merc was supplied by thaiguzzi. Edited By Bill Phinn on 16/11/2018 03:23:59 Edited By Bill Phinn on 16/11/2018 03:25:05 Edited By Bill Phinn on 16/11/2018 03:32:21 | |||||
Thread: AF socket sets. Are they extinct | |||||
11/11/2018 22:56:52 | |||||
Posted by not done it yet on 11/11/2018 22:08:22: I would always carry a 1/2” drive for wheel nuts/studs - and do away with the provided item in the car kit. Yes, I wouldn't want to have to try and remove wheel nuts that have been anywhere near the average highstreet or backstreet garage with either a 3/8 drive or the wrench supplied with the car. The wheelnuts on my Toyota Corolla are meant to be tightened to 104 N of torque, but the last time (four years ago) that my car had to go into a garage (after someone ran into the back of me) I couldn't budge any of my wheelnuts afterwards even with a 1/2" drive 16" long breaker bar. I suspect the impact wrenches garages now typically use are putting considerably more than 100N torque on most cars' wheel nuts. I now carry a 900mm long breaker bar for roadside wheel changes. Edited By Bill Phinn on 11/11/2018 22:57:56 | |||||
Thread: Replacing ball-bearing in 3/4" drive ratchet | |||||
10/11/2018 23:12:50 | |||||
Thanks for your suggestion, Mike. | |||||
Thread: AF socket sets. Are they extinct | |||||
10/11/2018 23:11:23 | |||||
Here's a modestly-priced set minus the 3/8 socket, which I'm sure you could supply for very little money: https://www.machinemart.co.uk/p/clarke-pro365-10-piece--drive-af-socket-set/ | |||||
Thread: Replacing ball-bearing in 3/4" drive ratchet | |||||
09/11/2018 23:25:49 | |||||
No I haven't, Michael, though perhaps I should have done since co-incidentally I inset 4 neodymium magnets yesterday into depressions I milled in the backs of those aluminium vice inserts you can see in one of my images in order to supplement the holding power of the rather weak magnets already there. Thanks for your suggestion. Edited By Bill Phinn on 09/11/2018 23:27:02 | |||||
09/11/2018 22:54:25 | |||||
Thanks for your reply, Howard. I think I probably could drill the pin out with a bit of effort. The more difficult bit might be replacing it with a ball-bearing that functions as I want it to. I suspect choosing the size of the ball is critical: too big and I risk damaging the hole as I drive it in; too small and I may not be able to move enough material in from the lip to hold the ball in place, and once I've started to move material it may be difficult to go back. The good news is the ratchet as it is functions quite well with most of my 3/4 sockets (i.e. it still holds most of the sockets on the drive, albeit a little tenuously). Incidentally, one of the two countersunk slotted screws you can see holding the cover plate in place is an impostor. One of the screws was missing when I got the ratchet out. I rifled through my boxes of misc. machine screws to try and find a replacement, which needed to be a 24tpi 3/16. The only 24tpi 3/16 screws I found had hex heads on them and were 1cm too short for the job. The solution (I don't have a lathe): cut the hex head off the screw that is too short; cut the head and a bit more off a slotted screw of the same diameter but a different pitch, and bronze-braze this head and a bit more on to the decapitated replacement. It works fine, though having a lathe would have been nice. I mean to fix my lack of one soon. | |||||
07/11/2018 20:47:43 | |||||
Many thanks, Hopper and Mike, for your replies. I think you're absolutely right about the ball-bearing actually being a cylindrical pin. I've added another couple of photos to try and better show what I'm dealing with. I forgot to mention that the pin isn't seized and the ratchet is quite useable as it is; it's just that heavy sockets (which 3/4 sockets generally are) tend to drop off the drive if you're not careful. Edited By Bill Phinn on 07/11/2018 20:48:51 Edited By Bill Phinn on 07/11/2018 20:54:59 | |||||
07/11/2018 00:22:11 | |||||
I was going through some rarely disturbed old tools underneath my bench and one thing I decided it would be nice to give a little TLC to was a 3/4 inch drive ratchet that had seen hard usage at some point under a previous owner. It still works more or less as it should, the only real defect being the ball-bearing in the square drive. As you can see, it has flattened off, and as a consequence no longer holds sockets in place. Can anyone suggest how I might best go about extracting the worn bearing and, more crucially, inserting a new one? Many thanks for any help.
|
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.