Here is a list of all the postings FMES has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Thread: beryllium copper compression spring needed |
19/01/2018 17:21:25 |
Posted by Martin Kyte on 19/01/2018 15:19:44:
Are we getting a little confused between beryllium copper and beryllium. The first can be disposed of in landfill in the normal way beryllium however is hazardous and requires safe disposal and special handling if it's machined. regards Martin Speaking of landfill, just after the war (and long before I was active on the planet) a large quantity of unserviceable aircraft instrument faces containg Tritium was buried alledgedly ten feet deep on the boundary of a large repair factory. Many years later (1990s) a nearby Naval base that on occasion received visits from vessels powered by nuclear reactors, was carrying out its regular detection tests and started to pick up tritium trace in the harbour. The source was traced back up the reach some three miles to the buried dial faces. A rather thorough clean up ensued.
Edited By *.* on 19/01/2018 17:24:43 |
18/01/2018 12:30:55 |
Remembering back to my aircraft days the MoD was very cautious and careful with regard to the use and handling of BeCu. So much so those that came into contact with it had the details added to their personal records in case of future claims for industrial related illness. Same for things like Cadmium and Magnesium Thorium. Personally I wouldn't have anything to do with it unless you can be sure you can maintain an adequate barrier between it and all points of entry on yourself. Lofty |
Thread: Hobby related jokes |
15/01/2018 09:54:28 |
That would rather depend on:
Edited By Journeyman on 15/01/2018 09:37:01 Would the engineer have all available appendages or be digitally challenged? |
Thread: Ferrabee Pillar Engine |
13/01/2018 19:39:26 |
Always on the lookout for a project Ian. |
13/01/2018 19:03:30 |
Posted by Ian Hewson on 13/01/2018 17:50:33:
Just a heads up on the balls for the governor, Anthony thinks ball bearings would not be suitable as they cannot be drilled. Can't be drilled, but can be spark eroded. I believe there was some discussion on building such a machine in ME around 2011. Lofty |
Thread: Facebook Cover |
11/01/2018 15:26:47 |
That made me look twice as to how the V10 was running with the valve chest cover removed - good trick. Lofty |
11/01/2018 12:35:56 |
realistic running shots? |
Thread: Intel PCs to be reduced in speed by up to 30% |
09/01/2018 12:16:39 |
All, Received from the Model Engine Maker site, for your info:
Hello all,
Unless you live under a rock
![]() ![]() The first thing is, there's no need to worry, about the forum at least! This server is pretty well secured, and despite hundreds of thousands of attempts since it was started (about 1000 attacks per day, just on one entry point), no-one has yet got in. For "Meltdown" to work, the hacker has to run stuff on the actual machine he's hacking, and on a machine like this, that means someone gaining control of it.
Second - we are likely to experience some unscheduled downtime over the next few days & weeks, as our hosting company update their infrastructure. Any downtime should be short (5-mins or so, no more), but as with anything computery, things don't always come back from a reboot in good working order, so I'll try to keep a close eye on the forum for the next few days, at least until the virtual host tells me they're done with any rebooting. If I do get any advance notice of a reboot, I'll try to post it here, to keep you all up to date.
In the meantime, anyone with a CNC lathe is probably best sending it to me for evaluation, just to be on the safe side :Jester:
To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck "Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email." in your profile.
You can view the full announcement by following this link:
Regards,
The Model Engine Maker Team.
|
Thread: Milling set up |
08/01/2018 11:19:17 |
We used to demonstrate this to apprentices. Take a piece of BMS 150mm x 40mm x 30mm and reduce the 30mm to 20mm using a 60mm face mill on a R8 Bridgeport. Each apprentice would be given the opportunity to remove the whole 10mm in 1mm cuts or a 5+5 with a turnover. The single sided cut always ended up with a .005" ish bow in the middle when checked on a surface table. Just to demonstrate a point to them. Lofty |
07/01/2018 15:13:03 |
Guaranteed that if you only mill off one side it will bend due to the stresses induced by the milling. Do as Tony says but instead of taking off the full two mm, rotate after one mm and reduce the other side by the remainder. Lofty |
Thread: Happy New Year |
01/01/2018 14:45:04 |
Welcome back Neil, and a very Happy New Year to you too. Lofty |
Thread: Recommendations for a quality milling vice? |
31/12/2017 16:34:23 |
I wonder how much that Chinese vice would have cost if it had been treated to the same amount of measuring and grinding in as shown in that video prior to selling.
|
30/12/2017 14:21:05 |
I use a Croz super precision - mainly because it fits my mill and was a very reasonable price. |
Thread: HMS Queen Elizabeth: Leak found on new aircraft carrier |
22/12/2017 07:46:11 |
Sam, Q1 Why no steam catapults? A1 No steam Q2 Why no electro magnetic launch system A2 Experimental system and VERY expensive, I'm not sure if even the USN have got it working yet, but I'm happy to be corrected. unasked question but relevant to Q1. Catapult launched aircraft require not only a catapult system (steam, electro magnetic, magic whatever) but a recovery system, that is arrestor wires strung across the blunt end of the deck. These are not simply random bits of steel cable, strung across the deck, but bits of steel cable with a gobsmackingly complex and expensive set of hydraulic dampers to absorb the loads imposed by a (say) 20 tonne aircraft at 150mph.stopping in (say) 20 metres. Merry Christmas cheers Bill
Also answers another question as to why we are buying the US Army version of the F35 and not the Navy Version - no need for sophisticated take off and landing systems. Oh, and the use of an Electro magnetic arrestor system when modern detections systems rely on Magnetic Anomaly Detection rather than just RADAR. That would be MAD wouldn't it?
|
21/12/2017 20:50:46 |
Looks ok to me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPy7FuA0Z6A |
21/12/2017 20:41:20 |
Posted by Samsaranda on 21/12/2017 18:44:32:
Vintagengineer, rocket assisted take off would certainly be spectacular. Lofty, not much use with a takeoff ramp for F35's if the latest report on their development states that they are overweight for the engine performance to land on the carrier which has to be done from the hover. Dave W Keep believing the fake news Dave |
21/12/2017 20:39:37 |
Posted by vintagengineer on 21/12/2017 20:28:23:
All our submarines are still steam powered! Submarines are boats - not ships |
21/12/2017 18:14:30 |
Posted by vintagengineer on 21/12/2017 16:49:23:
They could use rockets similar to those used on Hercules for quick take off on short runways. Posted by Samsaranda on 21/12/2017 12:40:50:
Re: the non provision of steam catapult because the aircraft are VTOL , a recent report in the press stated that F35 aircraft, which will equip the carriers some time in the future, have serious problems with being over weight for the power of the engines and this seriously compromises their ability to operate off carriers, maybe the omission of a steam catapult is a serious design error. We may need to operate alternative aircraft, perhaps Harriers, oh forgot we threw them all away, perfectly serviceable and would have filled the gap temporarily until the F35's could be made to work to spec., yes I know Harriers are VTOL as well and wouldn't need a steam catapult but a catapult would have kept our options open. Dave W
One big problem re the catapult, we don't use steam on board modern ships now. The F35's also use the ramp for takeoff - same as the harrier on the CVS, very rarely would VTOL be used, Lofty |
19/12/2017 12:06:15 |
Posted by Martin Kyte on 19/12/2017 11:05:31:
Posted by John MC on 19/12/2017 10:49:22:
Listened to a radio news report on the prop shaft leak this morning, the shaft is 7metres diameter, is it? Repeated an hour later so must be. What sort of seal is it? One of those rubber ones that is lubricated by the water around it? The name of these escapes me at the moment. John The Props are 7m diameter. The above link doesn't give shaft dia but the flanges on the 2 gearboxes shown estimate to maybe 1.8m and the output shaft to maybe 1m. The prop shafts by inference should probably be the same. regards Martin
Edited By Martin Kyte on 19/12/2017 11:06:29 The seal is a two stage graphite/ stellite ring composite assembly with and emergency inflatable nitrile tyre. And those are the plummer blocks not the gearboxes. Regards Lofty |
19/12/2017 11:28:03 |
Isn't it amazing that the press manages to declare to the whole world our current defensive weakness. Its not unusual for stern seals to leak during the first few sets of trials, and finding them is what shakedowns are for. The '45's suffered from exactly the same problem, but that dwindled into insignificance with the 'other' problems that arose. This leak on a ship of this size is about as significant as a nick in the wiper blade of a new car. Lofty |
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.