By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Machine Tool Task Light

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
John Shepherd09/02/2013 17:17:42
222 forum posts
7 photos

I was looking forward to the article on lighting in the latest issue of MEW as I need to update mine, but a clip on work light and some dubious costings on how much it costs to run hardly warrants an article. (surely it is better to know how much it costs per hour than how much it might cost if it lasts its expected life).

The article and the attached table indicates that the 3W LED gives less illumination than a 1W version but there is no explanation as to why. It would be interesting to know why this is.

I don't want to have a go at the author, at least he has made an effort to submit something but I am afraid it is not up to the usual standard of MEW.

If nothing else it has spurred me on to do something I have been meaning to do for some time. That is to measure the output of CFL lamps to see how the claims to be equivalent to a much higher wattage incandescent match up.

David Littlewood09/02/2013 18:14:03
533 forum posts

I think the article quite clearly did produce a cost per hour figure, so I can't agree with that criticism. I did however have two concerns about it. First, he appears to have accepted the power rating of the bulbs as being the same as the power consumption of the unit. This may be close to the truth with the incandescent bulbs, but may be far from true for the LED ones, where the transformer may dissipate more than the lights. Any article with pretensions to accuracy should have measured the power consumption; plug in power meters are cheap enough.

Second, I always feel concerned when writers mis-quote unit designations. Mr Theasby, the unit for energy you were using should be written kWh; in the article it was variously written as Kw/H and KW/h. The / means "per", and kW per hour, though it does exist as a meaningful unit, is NOT energy (it is in fact a ramp rate, the rate of change of power flows, well known to National Grid). The symbol W for watts is always capitalised (but the name is not); the symbol k for kilo (10^3) is always lower case (an exception to the general rule that increasers - M, G, T etc are upper case, and reducers are lower case) and the symbol h for hour is always lower case. There should also be a space between the number and the unit designation.

This may seem like nit-picking, but the standard methods exist in the SI system to minimise confusion and maximise rapid comprehension; if you are forever having to stop and work out what an author means it does not make for easy comprehension.

David

Edited By David Littlewood on 09/02/2013 18:21:07

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate