Sure that the seller dug this one up from his back garden. It looks in such a sorry state but I'm determined to give this a whole new lease of life.I will be working day and night to bring it back to as near to original as I can. Please check back often as I will be posting my progress as I go. Already getting some great help on these forums.

Edited By John Milton 2 on 03/04/2019 14:58:34

Edited By John Milton 2 on 03/04/2019 15:00:08

I'm sure we all look forwards to seeing the poor old thing back as it should be!

It's noticeably far worse from saddle to tail end - under a leaking roof?

The right-hand faceplate looks Drummond-pattern though the Myford name's clear on the guard.

The four small holes in that - and those two in the cross-slide - look as if user-drilled to hold specific work-pieces or accessories, but overall it does look as if that user was a careful one - no obvious "oops" grooves in the faceplates, or missing teeth visible in the headstock wheels.

There are a couple of damaged teeth in the 65 .. I mean 63 tooth gear noticed by Brian Wood who has been steering me along in the right direction since I signed up here. I'm making some good progress but I think to be honest this is just a stepping stone towards a different maybe more modern or usable future Lathe. I think with Brian's help it is now decided it is an ML2 as the headstock is all dismantled and if I'm right that can only be an ML2 or an ML4 threads are 2.02mm Should have it figured out when its finally done.

Looks like it was possibly a woodwoorker's lathe with the motor belted straight to the lathe spindle pulley with no countershaft, making rpm too high for most metalworking. Holes in the cross slide possibly then for a woodworker's tool rest.

Looks like you have a job there for sure. But if the half of the bed towards the headstock is not too bad you should be able to make something useable out of it. Surprising what these old lathes can be nursed into doing. Beware though: vintage machine tool restoration can turn into a hobby of its own!

Edited By Hopper on 04/04/2019 00:33:50

Hopper,

The cross slide holes you spotted at the control end were stud positions to clamp the top slide in one of two positions, swivelling about the mid-position hole as the fulcrum point.

Regards

Brian

Aha. Makes perfect sense now you point it out.

Edited By Brian Wood on 04/04/2019 09:38:27

Just a stab at my level of humour Brian. two missing or damaged teeth didn't count

Are we agreed this is an ML2? I believe the ML1 was cast as a single piece and this one is certainly in two parts. One large part being used as a door stop and the other part or parts on my bench. Amazing to see how well it cleans up after standing outside for so long. Good old British engineering.

Edited By John Milton 2 on 04/04/2019 10:38:43

So starting here, I came home to find this parked in my front pathway and set about unpacking like a little boy with a new toy.

I always find there are a few little bonuses when you buy second hand and already noticed an old Lathe lamp in the box.Possible up-cycle for some posh architect auction sale in the future.

horror of horrors one of the Chuck teeth is missing! After a call to the seller it was found on the floor of the delivery van and posted to me by the courier. I was worried it would be swept out but it all turned out well in the end on that part.

Hoover motor ,checked out okay and very quiet despite looking very tired. will probably run forever though.

There are no serial numbers I can find online for any of the early Myford Lathes. I noticed that there are some newly found documents that are being sifted through and will be posted when scanned and sorted.

More broken or damaged teeth found. This is sitting on the screw thread and is attached to the saddle. Hopefully using the correct terminology here. Should I be worried?

Should I Heat? Beat? or Replace? If only I had a Lathe to make one or two! hahaha

Some simple measurements and observations can identify which of the different models ML1 to ML4 one is faced with:

ML1 & 2: 3 1/8" centre height, 15" between centres, 3 1/2" cross slide travel.

ML3 & 4: 3 1/2" centre height, 24" between centres, 4 1/2" cross slide travel.

ML1 & 3 ('Standard' models): Spindle bearings direct in headstock.

ML2 & 4 ('Superior' models): Bronze spindle bearings, shrouded ball thrust race.

My understanding from lathes.co.uk is that the cast-in headstock was abandoned in 1937, so from then until the ML1 and ML3 went out of production in 1941, all models had the removable headstock.

George

Thanks for the info George. I guess I will find out when it's all back together. Brian Wood has tried to help me to identify it but I am far better at rust removal than working out. No great rush as I am poodling along right now with the clean up.

I would heat that handle up red and bend back straight. I've made a few similar for the old M-type using a ball turning tool. Stick the toolbit forward past the pivot point to turn the convex curve. You'll be able to do that once you get her up and running.

The presence of a serial number, the latest type of changewheel guard, the proportions of the bed and the tumbler reverse makes me think that you have a late model ML4.

If so, I would expect the spindle nose thread to be 1 1/8" x 12 tpi, Whitworth form. The only difference between this spindle nose and the later ML7 is that the register (the plain bit at the left-hand end of the thread) is the same diameter as the thread, whereas the ML7 has a 1 1/4" diameter register. ML7 accessories will fit, but with limited accuracy. For full accuracy you would need to fit an accurately turned collar to enlarge the register to 1 1/4"

Earlier ML1-2-3-4s had 7/8" diameter threads with either 9 or 12 tpi and a 7/8" register. I have never discovered whether this was model specific or at the choice of the purchaser. That said, my ML4 has a 7/8" BSF thread (11 tpi) on a non-myford spindle, so there are oddities to be found.

George

George,

Looking through the pictures John has sent me on Dropbox, the spindle nose looks like 3/4 inch but measured against a ruler, so it is probably 7/8 inch. The nose thread is certainly not 12 tpi, it is much coarser and again I have had to judge that from a ruler held against it

There is an odd rearward facing lug on John's lathe forming part of the rear spindle bearing, a feature new to me and certainly not present on my late father's ML4 that he bought new in 1945. I thought that was a feature of the earlier lathes, but I have no reason to believe that.

I modified my Dad's lathe with the larger diameter spindle collar of 1.250 inches to make ML7 chucks etc fit instead, the change to upgrade one of 7/8 inch thread is major, needing a new nose altogether but it can be done

Regards

Brian

Brian

Cheers Hopper, I have only used a wood Lathe years ago at night school but have meddled with the small simple lathe that is in my albums. Little steps for me to start with and if I break the handle straightening it then that's first on the list of things to try. I could probably make one on the little Lathe if I can get this done before I sell it on.

I have a cheap digital caliper if that would help in the measuring and identification? All in bits now so no problem. I appreciate all the help and just glad to have a unique Lathe possibly an ML4 1/2

Any help?