By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

How Do You Measure Your Holes?

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
vintagengineer17/12/2016 19:09:35
avatar
469 forum posts
6 photos

I agree with everything you say but thread was about measuring holes rather than checking for out of roundness which as you point out correctly the only tool for that is a CMM.

Posted by MalcB on 17/12/2016 17:36:56:

Posted by vintagengineer on 17/12/2016 14:57:45:

With a Bowers bore gauge you get a true and accurate reading, if you over tighten the gauge it won't come out of the hole and they are accurate to .0001". Also less skilled operators will find them easier to use than an inside mic, telescopic gauges or calipers, as these all rely on a degree of skill to take accurate readings,

The only other tool that gives the same result is CNC CMM.

Edited By vintagengineer on 17/12/2016 15:00:21

Not exactly true.

I have run a precision engineering shop ( 35 yrs ) manufacturing precision plain and white metal lined bearings where measuring bores is critical. Bowers, Tesa and Mititoyo 3 point internal gauges are in fact still used used on the smaller ranges of bearing bores. They are easy to use for operators and consistantly give accurate results to some extent. However they have their drawbacks. The main one in that they take no account of the holes roundness. We do in fact have operators who can measure bores equally as well using inside micrometers that are then verified over with an outside micrometer. This is down to operator skill levels and experience though.

Given roundness issues, it means measuring has to be further verified by a precision CMM, which is also demanded by those customers that will not accept 2 or 3 point micrometer results.

The issue with all micrometers is that 2 and 3 point measurement will never be as accurate as as a good precision CMM such as the Zeis models for the reason highlighted. The CMM will give a very accurate plot of the hole, its roundness, its cylindricity, taper, its best fit minimum, maximum and mean diameters. A Bowers or similar just cannot do this.

Micrometers ( 2 or 3 point ) do not in fact have guaranteed uncertainty of measurent figures that go down to 0.0001" as there are in fact too many variables in the tool itself, the process of using and interpretating it to achieve the end result required.

The Bowers type micrometers are far too expensive and each has a limited range such that will normally take them well out of the scope of the home engineer. Good results of bore/hole measurement can be achieved by using standard inside micrometers and cross verifying over with an external micrometer, you just need to practise getting the feel right and consistant.

For the home engineer, smaller holes a good pair of toolmakers inside calipers with micrometer over can get you pretty close to final sizing, again with practise on the feel. Telescopic bore gauges can give similar. Final sizing usually done with pins, be it drill shanks, drill blanks, precision dowels, silver steel, homemade plug gauge etc.

Edited By MalcB on 17/12/2016 17:37:57

Nick Hulme18/12/2016 00:21:23
750 forum posts
37 photos

Although primarily interested in how the other guys here do it on their own parts it's interesting to see what's happening in industry.

I don't think it's reasonable to say that the high tech means for detecting out of roundness doesn't class as measurement, I feel sure that it's based on sensors which detect and log the precise position of many points on the cylinder wall, each of which will have a set of co-ordinates AKA measurements

- Nick

Nick Hulme20/12/2016 16:22:40
750 forum posts
37 photos
Posted by Andrew Johnston on 17/12/2016 18:37:50:
Posted by MalcB on 17/12/2016 17:36:56:

The main one in that they take no account of the holes roundness.

Exactly, a three point measurement will give a 'precise' result on the inside of an equilateral triangle, although it is anything but round.

Andrew

In one position yes, but by measuring at various angular displacements a three point micrometer is specifically able to detect a hole which is Tri-Lobal, this was part of the QC for shell rings at a company for which I worked.

Correct use of measuring tools is not obvious to the inexperienced or indeed to Armchair Inspectors

- Nick

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate